Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gare du Stade-de-France-St-Denis CRW 0777.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.


NO FOP France, station made in 1998 PierreSelim (talk) 12:02, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Warning This is not a majority vote. If someone brought this page to your attention, or you brought this page to others' attention, please take note:

While widespread participation is encouraged, the primary purpose of this page is to gauge consensus of a representative sample of Commons users; therefore, it's important to know whether someone is actively soliciting others to bias sampling in this discussion. Such contributors are not prohibited from commenting, but it's important for the closing administrator or bureaucrat to know how representative the participants are of Commoners generally.

  1.  Keep JÄNNICK Jérémy (talk) 13:58, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Keep because of de minimis. Loreleil (talk) 14:05, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Delete Pas de liberté de panorama dans la législation française, et le recours à "de minimis" est injustifiable vu l'importance du motif principal qui fait toute la largeur de l'image. Kirtap (talk) 14:20, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  Delete "De minimis" doesn't apply to pictures where the copyrighted work is in the title of the file. Léna (talk) 14:30, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  5.  Keep Trafalguar (talk) 14:34, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  6.  Keep just the entrance of the railway station. (I am the author of the picture). --Poudou99 (talk) 16:07, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  7.  Keep threshold of originality not reached, the structure looks to be a straightforward combination of functional elements. Agree that de minimis argument is groundless; the station is the main subject of the picture. --Gribeco (talk) 15:07, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    The roof and the structure are not only functional, the guy wire style and the rest of the structure were chosen in order to evoke the Stade de France. PierreSelim (talk) 15:23, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    To be exact : the architectural view of the element might be considered as beeing de minimis because the photo view doesn't give a clear view of what might be considered as "creative". Due to lack of creativity of what is shown, and de minimis of what might be considered as creative I considered it as keepable. Loreleil (talk) 13:16, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per above, threshold of originality not met. Just looks like any station entrance. Wknight94 talk 03:26, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]