Commons:Deletion requests/File:Franziskaner hefe weissbier.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by HombreDHojalata as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Per Commons:Derivative works. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:29, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

also:
@Euku, LeeKeoma, Ras, and Miguel Andrade: @Boenj, Bene16, and Alfvanbeem: Pinging uploaders.
 Comment Not sure how old the monk images used is. Could be PD by age. Anyone with more insight? --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:35, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It seems that a different monk was used around 1900. The current art style reminds me a bit of images from the 1950s, but I'm far from an art expert. So I guess  Delete. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 12:53, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep File:Franziskaner hefe weissbier.jpg, File:Franziskaner WeissbierRoyal.jpg, File:Flasche Franziskaner Weissbier.jpg, File:Franziskaner 2 beers.JPG, File:Franziskaner Hefe-Weissbier Hell with glass.jpg, File:Franziskaner-WB.jpg, File:Franziskaner.dunkel.hefe.weissbier.1.JPG, File:Franziskaner.hefe.weissbier.JPG, File:FranziskanerKeller.jpg, File:FranziskanerWeissKristall.jpg and File:FranziskanerWeissNatur.jpg: they are clearly photographs of whole bottles. Neutral about File:Musée Européen de la Bière, Beer coaster pic-015.JPG and File:Kronkorken10-41-22.jpg, which might be deleted by precaution, depending on the status of the images. -- Asclepias (talk) 19:24, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Question The whole bottle argument is a bit shaky. Photographing the whole bottle doesn't make the logo automatically Com:DM. Anyone out there with some info about the history of the logo / monk? --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:37, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Logo has unknown age, COM:PRP. The whole bottle argument has no merit, since the logo is a substantial part of the bottle. You could say that without the logo, the photo would not have been made. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:27, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]