Commons:Deletion requests/File:Forcefire ao vivo em Mangaratiba, Brasil.jpg
Reasons for deletion request -Vickynorum (talk) 17:40, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
Kept: Incomplete deletion request by original uploader. Skeezix1000 (talk) 23:32, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
Arquivo: Forcefire ao vivo em Mangaratiba, Brasil.jpg
[edit]
REASON FOR DELETION Vickynorum85 (talk) 19:54, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minoraxtalk 05:43, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
Delete my old photo, i upload in my old account vickynorum. I haven't had an account since 2008 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vickynorum85 (talk • contribs) 21:52, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Why should it be deleted? - Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:56, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
this photo is mine and was placed by me in 2008, in an account to which i no longer have access to vickynorum. i want to remove the photo because it was for wikipedia in 2008, as my band the text was not approved the photo was abandoned at wikicommons. I want the photo to be removed and deleted because we are not famous musicians and I am in the photo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vickynorum85 (talk • contribs) 01:38, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
Delete Low res photo of non-notable band. Minimal if any in-scope usefulness. Support courtesy deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:49, 22 May 2021 (UTC)- Delete - Whilst licences are irrevocable and whilst it is categorised under Category:Music in 2008 - the file is of low/poor resolution and the guy in the image is non-notable anyway so given the aforementioned issues the file wont ever be used on or off wiki so in this specific case I too support a courtesy deletion.
Please also be aware Vickynorum courtesy deletions are very rare and never ever happen unless there's mitigating reasons so please don't upload files and then change your mind etc, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 21:49, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Keep - Well given the user has now go on from personally attacking people to canvassing I'm placing myself here. The file is of non-notable people however it's categorised under "Music in 2008" as it shows an image from that era.
- This might seem spiteful but if the user wants to blatantly personal attack people and then canvas then no I don't see why a courtesy deletion should continue.
- (I've added the file to Category:People with handheld microphones and Category:Topless men in Brazil.) –Davey2010Talk 11:35, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: No reason for courtesy deletion when the uploader makes liberal use of insults and profanity to support his case. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 06:47, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Comment Vickynorum85 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log) has canvassed numerous editors talk pages (e.g. [1]) with the subject line "Vote delete photo" and a link to this DR. If this photo is to be deleted, it shouldn't be a "courtesy deletion" (it would be rewarding them and set a dangerous precedent for future DR cases). Bidgee (talk) 05:18, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete In my opinion, the photo and all the attitudes of the person responsible for placing the item for removal, all that is happening is only giving more publicity for this person to appear. User talk:jimrogersjames 19:45, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- Publicity is not our problem. We're here to provide useful images to the world, Being blunt and to the point > It's not our problem if the photo uploader wants to make a complete ass out of themselves. –Davey2010Talk 20:14, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Interesting that jimrogersjames (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log) is a new account and the only edit was a vote to delete in this DR. Bidgee (talk) 21:21, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted. small unused personal photo without metadata, the user's only upload. Looks like not own work, but copyright violation. Also I will block Jimrogerjames indefinitely as sockpuppet. Taivo (talk) 07:00, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
