Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fiscal conservatives.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Deleted I don't understand the earlier DR above -- it appears to be about the same image, but this is not art, either by a child or an adult. It is a poor quality snapshot of a young woman in front of Mount Rushmore. It is not in use anywhere and is not listed in the large DR cited above. It is tagged with {{PD-ineligible}}, which is plainly wrong, and has no license. Even leaving the quality issue aside, without a license, we can't keep it. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:27, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
poor quality, personal image, out of scope Mercurywoodrose (talk) 19:01, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
Speede keep please: According to previous Deletion Request, this and all the files listed in them was kept. Amitie 10g (talk) 03:41, 26 May 2014 (UTC)- This is an entirely different rationale for deletion than the previous one, which was correct in general, but not on these specific images. this not a naive work of art by a child. this is an adult's work, which is being used in various places to provide documentation for wikisource and other subjects aside from childrens art.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 05:38, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 12:47, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
incorrect licensing tag, and also out scope as personal artwork by nonnotable artist Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:04, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted I don't understand the earlier DR above -- it appears to be about the same image, but this is not art, either by a child or an adult. It is a poor quality snapshot of a young woman in front of Mount Rushmore. It is not in use anywhere and is not listed in the large DR cited above. It is tagged with {{PD-ineligible}}, which is plainly wrong, and has no license. Even leaving the quality issue aside, without a license, we can't keep it. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:27, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
