Commons:Deletion requests/File:Female uterus.jpg
Out of scope becaue filename is "female uterus" but uterus is not shown (the uterus is an internal organ). Just another genital picture with a weak description that contributes nothing to the encyclopaedia. Three different pictures have been uploaded using one filename (see bottom of page). Timewasting and inconsistent nonsense, since none of the three show a uterus. Misleading. O'Dea (talk) 13:03, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
Comment - could we not just rename it? Maybe upload protect the page. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:36, 25 May 2012 (UTC)- Comment - But we don't need it. We have lots of nude pictures. This one is similar to, and no better than, existing nudity pictures. Delete per Commons:Nudity#New_uploads. O'Dea (talk) 18:45, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
*
Keep I moved it to File:Vulva and anus.jpg; no problem with confusion anymore. It is not the same as other photos; for example, there don't seem to be any other photographs of genitalia of Indian women. Handcuffed (talk) 00:12, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
- Keep current version,
Delete older revisions. The other two versions show up on http://www.mobypicture.com/user/TweetMeSomeSkin/view/10344230 and http://noviastraviesas.blogspot.ca/2008/10/novia-universitaria-cachonda.html, leading me to believe that they are copyvios. The current (and first) version shows up on http://www.mobypicture.com/user/kodaikal/view/12339882 with the same username and uploaded on the same day, so it's probably fine. Handcuffed (talk) 21:53, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
- Keep, freely licensed image, appropriate release by author, has been renamed to avoid confusion, unique image, serves illustrative purpose, focus with specific depiction of Indian female anatomy in such a fashion. -- Cirt (talk) 16:55, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
- Delete no evidence of own work, likely grabbed from some porn site by some kid that does not know much about female anatomy. /90.237.49.181 14:48, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Anonymous uploader, no evidence of model age and consent (cf. [1] and Wikimedia terms of use). --JN466 13:56, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
- Delete This is a poor-quality photo. Anatomical images should be clear (not blurry), and have proper lighting & contrast. This photo lacks those characteristics, and therefore isn't useful in furthering our educational aims. Senator2029║talk 21:55, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Possible copyvio, delete per COM:PRP. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:24, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
