Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fellation from 2006.JPG

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a very clear image of fellatio. Where's the penis going - up her nose? Delete per COM:NUDE . Stillwaterising (talk) 20:16, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Addition: also delete per COM:PORN, and possible COM:COPYVIO due to painting visible in background. - Stillwaterising (talk) 04:47, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per COM:PORN - clearly amateur. --E8 (talk) 20:20, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete not clear "view" for any educational purpose, private => out of scope. --Yikrazuul (talk) 23:33, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Copyrighted picture in the background. :) --Giorgiomonteforti (talk) 23:37, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
speedy  Keep: invalid rationale: Stillwaterising mentions no pictures which could supersede this picture Erik Warmelink (talk) 14:27, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Could be superseded by File:Wiki-fellatio.svg. - Stillwaterising (talk) 16:06, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No, that isn't a photograph. Erik Warmelink (talk) 19:15, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Your sneaky change of the nomination makes it somewhat hard to keep assuming good faith. Erik Warmelink (talk) 19:15, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I apologize for my breach of etiquette. Please AGF Erik. - Stillwaterising (talk) 04:47, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete COM:PORN. --JN466 13:00, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. A pretty bad picture, but we don't have many other photos of fellatio. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:55, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and SWR.... a copyvio because of the painting? Really? Since you seem to enjoy our policy pages, let me direct you to COM:DM. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:56, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused. Bad/ amator composition. Now, there are best alternatives uploaded. Joan Miro's signature. FAP (talk) 19:22, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep - Unused: not a reason for deletion. Bad composition: not a reason for deletion. There are other better versions uploaded: not a reason for deletion, and frankly untrue. Joan Miro's signature: most certainly not a reason for deletion. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:35, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Ohhh, I see, the painting, right. COM:DM - it's not an integral part of the image, it just happens to be there, therefore not a reason for deletion. -mattbuck (Talk) 01:34, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Reluctant  Keep. Not a brilliant image by any means, but we should have some. (If Miro's signature is a problem, it can be edited out.) --JN466 00:15, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept - it's IMHO the best of the few pictures we have on the topic - Jcb (talk) 16:46, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]