Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fabiana Rosales (cropped).jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fabiana Rosales (cropped).jpg

Per File:Fabiana Rosales.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:42, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:43, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fabiana Rosales (cropped).jpg

How can we make a crop when we have the following note by the copyright holder? "This photograph is provided by THE WHITE HOUSE as a courtesy and may be printed by the subject(s) in the photograph for personal use only. The photograph may not be manipulated in any way and may not otherwise be reproduced, disseminated or broadcast, without the written permission of the White House Photo Office. This photograph may not be used in any commercial or political materials, advertisements, emails, products, promotions that in any way suggests approval or endorsement of the President, the First Family, or the White House." E4024 (talk) 23:37, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

• Is cropping not a "manipulation"? --E4024 (talk) 23:38, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

If we have no right to crop the image then it's not free and the original, File:President Donald J. Trump Meets with Fabiana Rosales de Guaido 1.jpg should be deleted as well. --bjh21 (talk) 15:07, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Why not? Please see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Iett.png and what the closing admin wrote there. Or do we have double standards? --E4024 (talk) 15:17, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

I don't understand your question. I just pointed out that by your argument the original was non-free, so either you, or the closing admin, or someone else, might like to nominate it for deletion as well. I'm not going to do it myself because I'm not confident that the {{PD-USGov-POTUS}} on the original is incorrect (but I'm also not confident that it's correct, which is why I'm not voting “Keep” here). --bjh21 (talk) 15:24, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

"Manipulate" vs "modify". Then "my file" should have been kept "lejos, con creces". (Sorry for Spanish, more expressive language. :) "I do not let you manipulate this bread" means "you cannot even touch it with hygienic gloves". Whereas, in the case I indicated, an institution let their emblem be used "freely" and simply requested "not to modify" it... --E4024 (talk) 15:41, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

---

Closed as Kept. Per previous discussion, such US Federal Gov't photos from Official White House photographers are PD-US Gov. Disclaimers do not modify the PD status. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:42, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

−