Commons:Deletion requests/File:F-35C Lightning II at-sea trials 141104-N-ZZ999-011.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
EXIF states "courtesy of Lockheed Martin by Dane Wiedmann". As such it's not a US Govt PD work and not in PD. MileyCyprus (talk) 04:14, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Keep per statement at DVIDS, which is not restricted to US Gov personnel. {{PD-author}} applied. --Fæ (talk) 09:20, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep EXIF says "U.S. Navy photo courtesy of Lockheed Martin by Dane Wiedmann/Released". In my opinion "Released" means, that Lockheed Martin does not claim copyright. For example Commons:Deletion requests/File:USMC-06806.jpg has no word "Released" in EXIF. Taivo (talk) 12:14, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- Released means nothing in the sense of rights, it's just cleared to be published as non-classified information. Image is owned by Lockheed and published via USN, does not fall under PD-USGov licenses as it's not their work. Has to be considered non-free unless Lockheed states otherwiese. --Denniss (talk) 14:10, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Info: Related OTRS Ticket #2016052110008897. --Amitie 10g (talk) 20:00, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- keep exif is supplemental not dispositive. and when it says "U.S. Navy photo courtesy of Lockheed Martin by Dane Wiedmann/Released" that implies a photo release to the US government. Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 15:09, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Honestly, a vagua concern regarding the EXIG is a bit far fetched and not significant doubt. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:01, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
