Commons:Deletion requests/File:Eveline Pereira at the catwalk.jpg
I am Evelina Pereira and I have not gave permission for the publication of this photo. Please advise what is the next step to have this photo removed.Thank you 81.193.131.240 08:28, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
Info As far as can be observed here, the copyright holder is Roberto Santorini (who released his picture under a free license), not Evelina Pereira. --Eusebius (talk) 08:48, 6 October 2009 (UTC)- At the very least, we should certainly add {{Personality rights}}. - Jmabel ! talk 17:51, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, absolutely. Done, thank you. --Eusebius (talk) 19:07, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
Keep The photographer is a italian fashion photographer. Further more, this photo was taken in a public event, the Portugal Fashion 2005. This fashion model is a well known portuguese model, appearing several times on rhe press and television. The personality rights of this model - also a singer and actress, but is better known in Portugal as a fashion model.(if the ip that is requesting this deletion is the same as the model), according to the portuguese law, in this especific case is weak, as to according to paragraph 2 of the article 79 of the portuguese civil code, makes several exceptions to the image rights.
A rough translation:
"Its not necessary the consent of the person portrayed when so justify by their notoriety, his job, requirements of police or justice, scientific, educational or cultural purposes, or when the reproduction of the image comes framed in public places, or the facts of public interest or that has occurred publicly."
So this image is fine for several reasons:
1- Was taken in a public event in the catwalk on the presentation of the portuguese fashion designer Miguel Vieira, that is inclusive televised and extensively covered by the Portuguese press.
2- Its a notorious person.
3- The person portrayed is acting on its most notorious job.
3- Its framed in a public place and in a event that has occurred publicly.
4- Its a fact of the public interest.
So is image, as taken by a fashion photographer (see is flickr profile and this on a portuguese photography site.), in a public event as several that he as acess, so the copyright is with a photographer that as licensed with a creative commons license, so i see no problem with this image. Tm (talk) 19:18, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
- Keep But remove the RS watermark. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 20:28, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per above. Infrogmation (talk) 14:15, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
Kept, and personality rights duly noted. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 03:03, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
