Commons:Deletion requests/File:ETA structure.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
False authorship claims - obviously not the uploader's own work High Contrast (talk) 14:25, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
- False. I made it on my computer using Paint.NET. You can try. It's pretty easy, if you get enough information from realiable sources and can get the necessary photographs from the Spanish Police most-wanted terrorist lists (that are free-of-copyright because everyone has the right to diffuse and divulge the terrorists photos). Then simply try making some rectangles using the "Draw" Paint.NET function, insert the photos there and add the names and roles in the organisation. Unite the rectangles with arrows and write some text about the different functions of the military cells, add the 2011 Commons-Uploaded ETA mark and you will have the image you accused. And please, dude, stop quarrelling about all my self-uploaded pics. Thanks from Nicholas Urquhart (talk) 16:41, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
Delete Nicholas Urquhart| might have used paint.net but did Nicholas Urquhart| also photographed the depivted persons??? I guess not. As such delete it and Nicholas Urquhart| should learn what 'own work' really means. I support the nominator's action. Thanks. --79.237.136.246 18:02, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- I may have not photographed the nominated persons, but you can also talk in a less rude tone and READ before talking. That said, I have created the work using photographs from the Spanish Civil Guard most-wanted archives. The photographs are absolutely free to use, and it reads "Everyone is free to use, diffuse and divulge these images" since they represent criminals in-hiding and "diffusing and divulging" them may help catching them --Nicholas Urquhart (talk) 19:31, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- The IP is absolutely right, Nicholas Urquhart, your understanding of copyright is null. "Free to use" is nothing, that is not free in the sense of Commons. --High Contrast (talk) 21:32, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- I have indeed understanding of Copyright and I do not permit neither you nor the IP to talk with me in such rude tone. I have simply taken some photographs that are NOT copyrighted, since the Guardia Civils most wanted list does not even have a government-copyright: all the images are free to use, to divulge and publish, without any copyright. If it shall be a major problem, I can remove the photographs and keep the structure without images. Would this solve the problem? --Nicholas Urquhart (talk) 12:54, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, if the images get removed, this file can be kept. --High Contrast (talk) 12:14, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- Is there a way to keep some of the images? --Nicholas Urquhart (talk) 13:55, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, if the images get removed, this file can be kept. --High Contrast (talk) 12:14, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- I have indeed understanding of Copyright and I do not permit neither you nor the IP to talk with me in such rude tone. I have simply taken some photographs that are NOT copyrighted, since the Guardia Civils most wanted list does not even have a government-copyright: all the images are free to use, to divulge and publish, without any copyright. If it shall be a major problem, I can remove the photographs and keep the structure without images. Would this solve the problem? --Nicholas Urquhart (talk) 12:54, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
- The IP is absolutely right, Nicholas Urquhart, your understanding of copyright is null. "Free to use" is nothing, that is not free in the sense of Commons. --High Contrast (talk) 21:32, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: If you are the uploader, please email COM:OTRS FASTILY 08:56, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
