Commons:Deletion requests/File:EIGTH LEFT-HAND 2.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Not used, lacking proper source information. Damiens.rf 14:52, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
?? All the files used are from Commons is-it realy an obligation to write each files sources ? Otherwise it is inapropriate to ask for deletion such image (bad english, sorry). - Siren-Com (talk) 16:03, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, it probably is. Many images on Commons are licensed with a CC-by or similar free licence. This is still a free licence, but it does require the licence and source to be shown, so that attribution can be given, as required.
- It's possible that this image is a composite entirely of public domain images not requiring attribution. But that's most unlikely. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:28, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- When I will have time, I will notice each license on the picture page (or anayone can do it...). - Siren-Com (talk) 14:25, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
- Also, not every free license is compatible. For instance, you can't combine a GFDL image and a CC-BY image into a collage and license the collage as either of the original licenses. --Damiens.rf 16:16, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
- That's a good point, although general opinion is that CC-by can be combined with GFDL (and then licensed under GFDL), it's CC-by-sa that can't be. The problem is incompatibility of the copyleft aspects. Andy Dingley (talk) 16:45, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
- Also, not every free license is compatible. For instance, you can't combine a GFDL image and a CC-BY image into a collage and license the collage as either of the original licenses. --Damiens.rf 16:16, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
- When I will have time, I will notice each license on the picture page (or anayone can do it...). - Siren-Com (talk) 14:25, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: I'm not at all certain that this small collage is in scope, but it certainly lacks attributions. As noted above, it is possible that all of the images are CC-0 or PD, but it is very unlikely. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:39, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
@Siren-Com, Damiens.rf, Andy Dingley, and Jameslwoodward:
- Seriously? It took less than 5 minutes to find the original files :
.jpg)
- Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 09:48, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
- So, VIGNERON, what's your point? Five of the images have licenses which require attribution. There was no attribution given, so the collage was a copyvio. Also, as I said, I think it is out of scope, but I probably would not have deleted it for that alone. I would not object if you restored it and added the necessary attributions. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:04, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
- My point is: how the did we get to delete this file? True there is certainly problem(s) with these files (files as File:EIGTH LEFT-HAND.jpg is in the exact same situation even if nobody cared to be consistent) but it was very easy to fix the problem, and it's easier and more nice to correct than to delete. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 10:14, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
- File undeleted ; if you see still improvements to be made, feel free to make them! VIGNERON (talk) 12:39, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
- My point is: how the did we get to delete this file? True there is certainly problem(s) with these files (files as File:EIGTH LEFT-HAND.jpg is in the exact same situation even if nobody cared to be consistent) but it was very easy to fix the problem, and it's easier and more nice to correct than to delete. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 10:14, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
