Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dong Leshan.jpg
The file should be deleted per Not-PD-US-URAA. SD hehua (talk) 08:54, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
- Isn't it PD-1996 since it was published abroad in 1950 and no copyright has been renewed? Kingoflettuce (talk) 10:16, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
- Not yet,the photo is in copyright protection in China in 1996,so the picture has copyright in the US now because of URAA. SD hehua (talk) 12:52, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
- Even if the PRC gov doesn't consider the agreement to be binding? Strange. Anyway, if you say so... Kingoflettuce (talk) 02:45, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
- The WMF is in the US.But the URAA pictures seems no common sense to be deleted or not.So let us wait for the admins to decide whether the picture should be deleted. SD hehua (talk) 02:56, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
- Even if the PRC gov doesn't consider the agreement to be binding? Strange. Anyway, if you say so... Kingoflettuce (talk) 02:45, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
- Not yet,the photo is in copyright protection in China in 1996,so the picture has copyright in the US now because of URAA. SD hehua (talk) 12:52, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
Kept: I do not see sufficient arguments for deleting this image. The Wikimedia Foundation – through the statement of the Legal department - does not see a reason to delete content simply because of general concern about the URAA. The document on Commons at COM:URAA states “A mere allegation that the URAA applies to a file cannot be the sole reason for deletion.” I decided to keep the image, because it has a correct licence for the country where it originated. In addition, the file page is showing a warning sign that a licence tag is missing which will show the image is possibly not in public domain in the USA which will prevent re-users from the USA to use it freely without additional research. If you do not agree with this decision, you are kindly requested to nominate the image again for deletion in order to have a broader discussion about it. --Ellywa (talk) 11:17, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
