Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dalmatian Cities.svg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dalmatian_Cities.svg

File is (or seems to be) empty Erik Baas (talk) 13:42, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

• Actually, if you open up the SVG file in a text editor, there are a fair about of text elements and vector paths; not sure why they don't display, though... Give the original uploader a reasonable time to fix the problems, and if still isn't fixed, then delete the image...
  • P.S. Trivially added an opaque dark background, so you can see the paths (but still not the text, for some reason, though the text does display in Adobe SVG plugin). AnonMoos (talk) 21:56, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

 Delete The code includes a reference to http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 14:04, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

• I have no idea what this objection is supposedly based on, since that's part of the standard minimal Dublin Core Metadata SVG file info, as automatically inserted by a number of programs:

  <metadata>
    <rdf:RDF>
      <cc:Work rdf:about="">
        <dc:format>image/svg+xml</dc:format>
        <dc:type rdf:resource="http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage" />
      </cc:Work>
    </rdf:RDF>
  </metadata>

From the point of view of the Dublin Core Metadata classification scheme, an SVG file is a "still image"! AnonMoos (talk) 21:48, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Sorry. It was not meant as an objection. I mistakenly thought the external reference might explain why this did not show anything. I must have been confused. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 22:01, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

---

Deleted. Unused and unlikely to be educationally useful MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:27, 11 May 2009 (UTC)