Commons:Deletion requests/File:Coat of arms of Central Lithuania 1920.svg
As usual, user Лобачев Владимир continues to create fake, historically inaccurate flags and coat of arms. He himself modified historically accurate coat of arms and uploaded this file. It should be deleted to avoid confusion as it is historically inaccurate. The symbol on the horse rider's shield is the Double Cross of the Jagiellonian dynasty (the most important national symbol of Lithuania after the horse rider itself). Violation of COM:NOTHOST, WP:OR, WP:HOAX rules.
-
The initial file which was modified without any valid reasons
-- Pofka (talk) 12:10, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Keep On all stamps of Central Lithuania and in the Official Gazette of the Provisional Administrator of the Commission of Central Lithuania (polish Litwa Środkowa. Dziennik Urzędowy Tymczasowej Komisji Rządzącej) No. 1, November 17, 1920, the coat of arms is one-color.
- The website heraldicum.ru states that the Polish eagle and the Lithuanian Pursuit were silver: “the coat of arms was a red dissected shield, in the right scarlet field there was a Polish silver one-headed crowned eagle, in the left scarlet field there was a silver Lithuanian Pahonia”. Where does blue come from? Just because it is so on the modern coat of arms of the Republic of Lithuania after 1991? There is not a single document that speaks of a blue saddle and a rider's shield. This is an original user research. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 12:31, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Russian sources are not reliable when we speak about other countries and mostly are full of propaganda in the Russian Federation. -- Pofka (talk) 08:52, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
- Here is a color image of the coat of arms (source). This is a Dutch source. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 09:57, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
- But the use of blue in the coat of arms is not even in Lithuanian sources. The blue coat of arms is a fake. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 15:35, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: No reason for deletion of this image. According to the Deletion policy a supposedly incorrect, original researched or not-neutral image is not a reason for deletion. This aspect should be addressed on the projects. The image is currently in use on the projects, so it has to be maintained. --Ellywa (talk) 18:39, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
