Commons:Deletion requests/File:China Communications Press.png
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
ToO in China is very low. This logo may be copyrighted in China. 沈澄心✉ 02:45, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - Just like you said, TOO China is low, but you can't judge subjectively. You should have example(s) to prove it, or you can request deleting many logos like this with the same reason. In my opinion, this logo is made up of some curved geometry superimposed. It isn't copyrighted. --Rowingbohe♬(Talk/Work) 15:00, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Rowingbohe: Here(related news coverage) is an example. The logo of 港亨 is mush more simple than the logo of China Communications Press. Uploading logos from China is strongly discouraged. --沈澄心✉ 08:39, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
- I don't think so. "港" and "亨" are Chinese characters, and the word "Gang Heng" is made up of English letters. The news coverage said, "被异议商标与之在字体、表现形式上完全相同" (The objected trademark is exactly the same as it in font and form of expression.) Yes, in my eyes, the logo with Chinese character or English letter is copyrighted in China, but I can't see any character or letter on the logo of China Communications Press.--Rowingbohe♬(Talk/Work) 08:45, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
- You said, "The logo of 港亨 is mush more simple than the logo of China Communications Press", but I think the logo of China Communications Press is much(not
mush) simpler (notmore simple) than the logo of 港亨. --Rowingbohe♬(Talk/Work) 08:46, 3 October 2020 (UTC)- @Rowingbohe: What about this one? (For the word simple, see wikt:simple.) --沈澄心✉
- So what do you mean? Do you want to delete all the logos that come from Mainland China? Thank you, but I only found simply in OALD. --Rowingbohe♬(Talk/Work) 09:04, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
- No. But most logos from mainland China should be deleted, unless {{PD-China}} applies. Many logos like this have already been deleted (an example). --沈澄心✉ 09:23, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
- The logos of CCTV channels have some English letters. Also, CCP's logo is simpler than CCTV's. --Rowingbohe♬(Talk/Work) 03:24, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Rowingbohe: Note that File:湖南卫视2013logo.png is also deleted. --沈澄心✉ 14:44, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
- Replied at the bottom of the page. By the way, can you describe the content of "File:湖南卫视2013logo.png" in detail? Only a "mango"? --Rowingbohe♬(Talk/Work) 16:09, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Rowingbohe: Note that File:湖南卫视2013logo.png is also deleted. --沈澄心✉ 14:44, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
- The logos of CCTV channels have some English letters. Also, CCP's logo is simpler than CCTV's. --Rowingbohe♬(Talk/Work) 03:24, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
- No. But most logos from mainland China should be deleted, unless {{PD-China}} applies. Many logos like this have already been deleted (an example). --沈澄心✉ 09:23, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
- The logo of Liuyi is made up of English letters "L" and "Y". Can you find any English letter in the logo of CCP? Also, File:PRDIR_logo_without_text.svg is OK, I don't think this one is copyrighted. --Rowingbohe♬(Talk/Work) 09:08, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
- So what do you mean? Do you want to delete all the logos that come from Mainland China? Thank you, but I only found simply in OALD. --Rowingbohe♬(Talk/Work) 09:04, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Rowingbohe: What about this one? (For the word simple, see wikt:simple.) --沈澄心✉
- @Rowingbohe: Here(related news coverage) is an example. The logo of 港亨 is mush more simple than the logo of China Communications Press. Uploading logos from China is strongly discouraged. --沈澄心✉ 08:39, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry but with all due respect, you haven't answered my question directly so far: why does this file not conform to TOO China? You listed a lot of examples, but they have no connection to the logo of CCP. (In fact, I've read them before.) You're still judging subjectively. I think you should elaborate on the complexity of this logo.
- The reason for this deletion is confusing. You use a word, "may". You only provided a vague reason, but did not give a detailed explanation. This reason also applies to the submission of other deletion requests from logos of China. Category:Logos of China has lots of Logos that may be copyrighted in China, and most of logos in it are more complex than CCP's logo. But you only request to delete this one uploaded by me, it's confusing, too. --Rowingbohe♬(Talk/Work) 16:09, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
- Whether the logo has English letters or not is not the key point. The shape itself is complex enough (like this). --沈澄心✉ 04:29, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Rowingbohe: "Only request to delete this one uploaded by me"? Have you ever taken a look at [1], [2] and [3]? --沈澄心✉ 09:51, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry, I didn't notice that, I just looked at my user talk page. I could't be AGF to you anymore. --Rowingbohe♬(Talk/Work) 14:08, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
- There's no more thing to explain, since even can be copyrighted in China. --沈澄心✉ 10:31, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you for your explanation. Could you request to delete more logos in Category:Logos of China later? --Rowingbohe♬(Talk/Work) 13:59, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Rowingbohe: OK. I'm nominating more logos now. --沈澄心✉ 02:35, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you for your explanation. Could you request to delete more logos in Category:Logos of China later? --Rowingbohe♬(Talk/Work) 13:59, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:10, 27 October 2020 (UTC)