Commons:Deletion requests/File:Catherine Delahunty signature.svg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
The subject has complained about his signature been on commoms per OTRS 2010070610043858. She has requested it be removed Brian (talk) 11:13, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
- A discussion related to this was recently discussded at the VP. Commons:Village_pump/Archive/2010May#Images_of_Signatures_and_BLP_concerns. Maybe this is of interest here. --Martin H. (talk) 02:40, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
- Refering to that discussion: en:Catherine Delahunty seems not to be a top line politician ("just" a Member of the parliament) and the signature is not in her article, so deletion is probably ok. --PaterMcFly (talk) 09:47, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
- To note, it was deleted recently after it was added from her article due to a proposal en:Wikipedia:Signatures of living persons. A member of parliament seems to meet the criteria of that proposal for inclusion, specifically since this signature's source is from a mass e-mail from the party, presumably to many recipients. Personally I think publicly elected officials signatures should be included in their articles if available. They sign many public documents and thus I think it's relevant to their articles. — raeky (talk | edits) 00:19, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
- Refering to that discussion: en:Catherine Delahunty seems not to be a top line politician ("just" a Member of the parliament) and the signature is not in her article, so deletion is probably ok. --PaterMcFly (talk) 09:47, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
Kept, signature of a public person are not private. Kameraad Pjotr 21:13, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
