Commons:Deletion requests/File:Carlsberg, affiche publicitaire.JPG
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
suspected copyright violation Kenmayer (talk) 22:33, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
- I wonder where this photo was taken. -Nard the Bard 22:52, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
- It says Cherbourg, but text is in Danish; no FOP in any of those places -
Delete
This photo was actually taken in Cherbourg, on the door of a café.
Palamède (talk) 23:51, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
- However, this suggests it is from 1930. I cannot read if the poster is signed - maybe {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}}? /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 15:42, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
- I don't think the poster is signed, so the original is probably out of copyright. But the photo is modern, so the physical poster is modern. So we have to be sure that the poster is a facsimile of the original, not at all modified, otherwise a modern copyright would apply to the new derivative work. --Simonxag (talk) 00:16, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
- It doesn't look like a poster to me. It looks like one of those metal signs. It very well could be original if it was well-preserved. -Nard the Bard 23:04, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
- 70 years on a door? It's done well! I bet the door needed painting a few times. --Simonxag (talk) 13:16, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
- It doesn't look like a poster to me. It looks like one of those metal signs. It very well could be original if it was well-preserved. -Nard the Bard 23:04, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
- I don't think the poster is signed, so the original is probably out of copyright. But the photo is modern, so the physical poster is modern. So we have to be sure that the poster is a facsimile of the original, not at all modified, otherwise a modern copyright would apply to the new derivative work. --Simonxag (talk) 00:16, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
Keep The link Pieter provides is evidence enough for me: The work is from 1930. It does not matter how old the sign is because it can't be regarded as a new work (any minor changes would not meet the threshold of originality). The small text reads "Leverandør til det Kgl. Danske Hof" (By Appointment to The Royal Danish Court). Change to {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} like Pieter suggests. Nillerdk (talk) 16:45, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Kept - photo of a sign that is old enough (non-admin closure). /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 20:35, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
