Commons:Deletion requests/File:Carloslatuff.jpg
Copyvio tag reverted by User:Liftarn with "A blog entry is not a reason. Please explain.". Ok. I tried to explain it. Getting reverted by User:Pieter Kuiper via "reuse does not make this a copyvio; make a regular DR if you disagree". Somebody checked the indicated source "http://latuff2.deviantart.com/" ("©2011 deviantART. All rights reserved")? No related image. So, what I am supposed to do? {{subst:npd}} for a source which is apparently not the source? If so, please tag the image like that. Or do I have to browse the 100.000 files under this link to eventually find exactly the image reference for a copyvio tag? Come on. Last mark was: "copyvio (example) http://blog.jonolan.net/politics/a-surprising-source/?nggpage=9 (2009) or http://www.haksozhaber.net/devrimci-cizer-carlos-latuff-ile-konustuk-18819h.htm (01.2011, "Copyright ©2001 Haksöz Haber") or http://cpds.ps/eng/news-det-383.html (02.08.2011) or http://affendina.blogspot.com/2009/04/carlos-latuff.html (2009) or...", involving multiple, unknown copyright issues. Gunnex (talk) 23:15, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
Comment the reference to copyright claims on http://www.haksozhaber.net/ etcetera does not explain anything, it certainly does not apply to this photo; that is why I removed the copyvio template, which is for obvious cases only. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 23:21, 14 December 2011 (UTC)- Comment Latuff generally releases much of his work under Creative Commons, and the images so licensed generally have their own pages with the license clearly stated. I did not see this particular photo in a minute looking around the site; it would help if the uploader would link to the particular page where the photo originated rather than the front page of Latuff's site. I note that this photo is in use in multiple Wikimedia projects. I also note that the site has multiple other photos of Latuff with clearly stated Creative Commons licenses. I therefore suggest that if this image is to be deleted, one of the different free licensed photos of Latuff be substituted in Wikipedia pages first. -- Infrogmation (talk) 00:11, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- Comment "I also note that the site has multiple other photos of Latuff with clearly stated Creative Commons licenses" (User:Infrogmation) --> I noticed this too. But these images are related to his own created art which were liberated via User:555/Latuff and/or several OTRS-tickets. "it would help if the uploader would link to the particular page" (User:Infrogmation) --> I informed the user about that issue. Gunnex (talk) 09:22, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Delete The provided source is not reliable enough to determine copyright. Werieth (talk) 13:29, 4 June 2012 (UTC)- Deleted. Uploader is not trustworthy, eg. File:Vfudge.jpg, which is a 1970 photo by Michael Ochs. Thuresson (talk) 21:43, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 21:43, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
