Commons:Deletion requests/File:C Sharp logo.svg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Also:

This is not an appropriate logo. The closest to an official logo is located at File:C Sharp wordmark.svg; it appears on the [official documentation] and [various product websites]. This logo is not used by Microsoft anywhere; however, there have been certain problems trying to edit it out of existing pages. This is basically fanart, and its presence is confusing and misleading. Reflectronic (talk) 21:50, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why delete it outright? Can't it just be removed from the pages where it's used? OmenBreeze (talk) 00:26, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete I agree. It was just changed back again. I would argue this file is not in scope because it does not meet the requirements of being "realistically useful for an educational purpose." —Pathogen-David (talk) 11:53, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I understand that it's in scope due to appearing on other projects. I've removed it from as many existing pages as I can, although the problem I noted on the English Wikipedia page still persists.
    It's not even a good representation of the logo. The 'C# color' has always been green, not purple. You can see this in things like Visual Studio project templates. I'm not sure that it serves a good purpose. Reflectronic (talk) 08:18, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Because it appears in the official documentation, demonstrating the confusion between the different logos is itself an educational use (as stated above, the names and descriptions should be changed so that we don’t create more confusion).
Does our use of the logo lead people to think that we represent the trademark owner? No, of course not. No trademark problem here.
Brianjd (talk) 13:53, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • So is demonstrating the confusion between the logos a legitimate educational use? To help answer this question, as well as resolve this DR more generally, I tried to investigate why the logo keeps getting added back in to Wikipedia articles. I can’t comment on viwiki, since I don’t know the language, but on enwiki, it looks like similar IP addresses keep adding it back in and don’t care whether it’s legitimate, based on edit summaries. And there’s no relevant discussion on the talk page. This suggests that:
    1. Demonstrating this confusion is not educational.
    2. It is not legitimately in use on enwiki and therefore COM:INUSE does not apply (at least for enwiki).
 Weak delete Brianjd (talk) 10:44, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Neutral I don't have any leaning as to whether it should be deleted from here or not, but I did start the discussion as to what logo should be used over at enwiki, as above commenters have mentioned that its use there is both important to this deletion request and probably not warranted. Eiim (talk) 16:05, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete This logo is a derivative of the C++ logo and violates the [terms of use] of the C++ logo. Please don't use it. blelbach 2020-10-21S

Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 14:12, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]