Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bottom sits on a dildo.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Out of Scope. WQL (talk) 09:09, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Worthless, poor quality, redundant and out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 00:30, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- I'm not commenting on the content of this DR, but AshFriday seems to reply with the exact same statement over, and over, and over, and over again. What value does that add to the conversation? This person doesn't seem to comment on the content being discussed but leaves a repetitive message in order to let any admin think that there is another "vote" for deletion which is playing with any actual forms of consensus based on content. So any admin reviewing this please take the above in context. Please use actual arguments. Also note that some uploaders have found these comment less than collegial. Let's please remember that deletion requests are not a vote. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 23:23, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Clearly out of scope. funplussmart (talk) 14:29, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- Comment at "File talk:Bottom sits on a dildo.jpg" (mobile link) @Pancet56: asks "Why is this image up for deletion the user is really enjoying it. Pancet56 (talk) 19:50, 31 January 2019 (UTC)" (section), I am pinging him here so he can be a part of the discussion as he doesn't seem to understand how deletion requests work. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 23:23, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:24, 5 February 2019 (UTC)