Commons:Deletion requests/File:Botticelli Madonna and Child 02.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I cannot improve file? File:Botticelli Virgin and Child.jpg, I don't understand purpose of all this, waste of time Artinpl (talk) 20:50, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Where you have proof of this in this file? I don't see any expression of my will here. This file is just a primitive violation of my copyrights and must be deleted. Artinpl (talk) 20:01, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Artinpl: In my upload / initial edit of this file description page, I stated the following:
" |source = Photo by Artinpl, as uploaded version of File:Botticelli Virgin and Child.jpg as of 20:32, 2 August 2013 (UTC), described as "File not in use, higher resolution and better versions in Commons, hence replaced with own work with frame" in this edit[1], using name suggested by that user in multiple edits".[reply]
Those multiple edits were 1, 2, and 3. I have just added them to this file description page. Your intent was crystal clear to me: to have this image displayed with this filename. I uploaded this image with this filename as a split to satisfy what I saw as your intent and stop your COM:OVERWRITE violations. If your intent differed then or differs now, please explain how and why. If your intent was for File:Botticelli Virgin and Child.jpg to cease having that filename, that will not happen, as you have been told four times already - the horse is dead, please stop beating it, drop the stick, and step away.   — Jeff G. ツ 03:24, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
{{Vd}} Delete! My consent must be clear and explicit, not a tricky one or implicit. Better consult a very, very good lawyer, because it might cost you a lot, a lot. For the time being I wish you a lot of success in destruction of wikipedia, as I will not discuss any more and my futher actions can be only direct. Artinpl (talk) 16:37, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Artinpl: I have struckout your transclusions of {{Vd}}, you do not get three !votes. That is beyond the pale.   — Jeff G. ツ 01:54, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: file is validly licenced and not even the uploader, unless for personality rights, can remove it without consent. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 14:08, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]