Commons:Deletion requests/File:BatangasCathedraljf8745 02.JPG

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry, the uploader do not even check his pictures before uploading them. Briarfallen (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for you message. Actually, I noticed the rather blurred photo, however, I also noticed therein a mysterious object which may interest paranormal study on this, so I uploaded this. Respectfully, submitted, no objection to the deletion. Best regards.--Ramon FVelasquez (talk) 23:47, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Is being blurry a valid rationale? A keep is justified as this illustrates a cathedral, albeit in a blurry manner. Also, Briarfallen, grammar, grammar. Bonkers The Clown (talk) 05:50, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Too lazy to do some investigation. Since I now know that there are better images, kudos to Elin Beltz, I opine for a delete. Bonkers The Clown (talk) 16:09, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete The project has other less-blurry images of the same part of the same cathedral. See File:BatangasCathedraljf8730 07.JPG, File:BatangasCathedraljf8730 04.JPG, File:BatangasCathedraljf8730 12.JPG and File:BatangasCathedraljf8745 11.JPG for more views of same place. I don't think we need a blurry view when we have better ones. Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:47, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, the paranormal object, which looks like a flying spaghetti monster, is better seen here. An elaborate glass lamp, hanging from ceiling. I solved the mystery and now we can close the case. Taivo (talk) 12:33, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]