Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bahá'u'lláhs anlete by Nahib.jpg
Please consider placing a clearer warning whenever an image of claiming to be of Tomajok (talk) 17:30, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
Dear Administrators, please note that many of these images of Baha'u'llah all come from CASPIAX. Clearly this person must have been made aware of the offensive nature of his posts to members of the Baha'i community and has continued to add edited versions or similar photographs claiming to be of the Prophet founder of the Baha'i Faith. These images are all extremely disquieting and offensive to have in general view. I believe that this posts may be made in an attempt to attack the Baha'is with the intention to offend. Tomajok (talk) 17:37, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
Keep Not a valid argument for deletion. Badzil (talk) 17:54, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
- Why exactly has this image been deleted? Badzil (talk) 01:23, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, why was the image deleted? The nominator didn't even request a deletion, only that the image is used with propriety. Thuresson (talk) 20:09, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:45, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
This image has been superseded. The deletion of this image will not result in the breakage of a attribution path. The suprseding image has a superior description, better source, and most importantly it isn't cropped. 84.13.123.70 19:58, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Storkk (talk) 15:57, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
It looks like a modern work of art. It's probably not as old as it is written. Public domain information is also missing. AprilDass (talk) 23:05, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
- Also, apparently it's not in the book cited. See File talk:Bahá'u'lláhs anlete by Nahib.jpg. --AprilDass (talk) 04:34, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Derivative work of File:Bahá'u'lláh (Mírzá Ḥusayn-`Alí Núrí) in 1868.jpg without new copyright. No need to delete imho. --Ellywa (talk) 06:41, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
_in_1868.jpg){kind=link}
