Commons:Deletion requests/File:Atheist campaign tube3.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tube advertisements

[edit]

No freedom of panorama for 2D works in the UK. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:37, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope (no educational content) Jcb (talk) 10:38, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Restored, see here - Jcb (talk) 07:11, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Atheist_campaign_tube3.jpg

[edit]

Re-opening the DR to check for the typographical arrangement copyright issue, mentioned by Clindberg in the UR-discussion[1]. --Túrelio (talk) 07:28, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment I'd say it's both de minimis for the logo and ineligible for copyright for the rest of the ads (lack of originality). Therefore the only question would be : what about the law concerning quotes ? (which actually would make the Dickinson quote PD anyway so the question applies to the 2 other ads). --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 16:03, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep per above. Emily Dickinson's quote is PD, the rest is unelegible for copyright or de minimis (plus, my personal consideration which may be considered or not as a good reason for keeping the file: I belong to a Humanist association and I think that very unlikely BHA would sue Wikimedia for publishing a campaign that is meant to be known everywhere. But I acknowledge this is not a "Wikimedian" argument for keeping thus I put it on brackets :-) )-- Blackcat (talk) 22:06, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • The UK has a typographical arrangement copyright: Copyright in the typographical arrangement of a published edition expires at the end of the period of 25 years from the end of the calendar year in which the edition was first published. Given the wording, it's possible that is only meant for books and magazines and the like, and not stuff like this. That's really the only possible concern with this one. The Adams quote in poster #2 is also possibly an issue, as that came from a book. But, presumably they had permission to use it in this context, if it was a copyright issue. Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:06, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • Some additional guidance here, here, and here. That last one mentioned that it is for Published editions of literary, dramatic or musical works, which may imply that the underlying material must also be a "work" to qualify for this protection, which is likely not the case here, but not entirely sure. Carl Lindberg (talk) 17:12, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Seems to be neither a published edition nor a literary, dramatic or musical work to me, so the UK typographical arrangement copyright does not apply. --Rosenzweig τ 16:06, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Atheist_campaign_tube3.jpg&oldid=63029834"