Commons:Deletion requests/File:Areolar enlargement.png
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Personal photo by non-contributors, see COM:NUDITY. Astrinko (talk) 17:03, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
Keep I don't see any other photos showing this type of areolar enlargement (colloquially, puffy nipples). File:Areolar enlargement - cropped.png is cropped from this and is in use; in general, I'd say that if the cropped work is in scope, so is the uncropped work.--Prosfilaes (talk) 19:18, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- Also tending Keep. Calling someone a "non-contributor" who just registered today and has already uploaded several images which aren't just exhibitionist in nature but might have educational value (like demonstration of a manual breast milk pump) might be a bit premature. Those are clearly not personal photos as they show at least two different women. (In that regard, what's probably more concerning is the lack of EXIF data.) Nakonana (talk) 01:20, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- Right. "Gnome-screenshot" is the sum total of the Metadata. I will not call for keeping this photo unless the uploader clearly shows this isn't actually just a screenshot. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:54, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, to copy and paste what I posted on the breast pump discussion: Yes I took the photo (and the others I have uploaded), with the consent of the two individuals in the photos. The reason the metadata says screenshot is simply because rather than edit the image I took a screenshot in order to crop it. Please feel free to reverse image search the image. I cannot provide a non cropped image as this will show the individuals face, however perhaps I can upload a version with the original metadata intact. Thank-you for agreeing with regard to the usefulness of the photo, there are many images of breasts on the commons however the vast majority of these are not particularly useful as they are taken from a distance - this one may also be the only which shows areolar enlargement, which is an important physiological change during pregnancy. Rogerthat9001 (talk) 08:18, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- I'd say definitely provide that metadata to COM:VRT, and thanks! Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:02, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
