Commons:Deletion requests/File:Antônio Filipe Camarão.png

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Antônio Filipe Camarão.png

Useless + not used anywhere. RodRabelo7 (talk) 12:36, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

•  Question Explain why this image (and therefore the other one) is "useless." Is this an image of a historical individual? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:36, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

  @Ikan Kekek It is an image of a notable historical person, but may not be useful for that purpose. Or, at least, may not be any more useful than the 17th century portrait that it is apparently based on.

  As a demonstration of image synthesis, it might be useful. But, again, is it more useful than other images? I don’t know. Brianjd (talk) 11:46, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

• To be kept, it doesn't have to be the most useful in scope: that would be a COM:VIC argument. It merely has to be reasonably imaginably useful. Therefore, I would tend to support keeping this file. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:46, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

  @Ikan Kekek Presumably, people could use DALL-E (or other AIs) to create any number of images depicting this individual and upload them to Commons; presumably, the community would try to draw the line somewhere. I am suggesting that, if we must draw the line somewhere, this might be a good place to draw it. Brianjd (talk) 10:57, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

• Understood. The arguments have been laid out. Let's see what an admin thinks. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:39, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

It was created using DALL-E based on the original image. I first created it to use on a article I was writing about some letters Camarão wrote in 1645, but I later gave up on this purpose because I found a better photo on public domain. This image has absolutely no historical value. RodRabelo7 (talk) 04:44, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

• OK, I'm convinced.  Delete. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:49, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

For the record, the uploader claimed that this file was created using DALL-E, which is why I mentioned DALL-E above. This file is similar to the portrait it is based on, with the subject mostly dressed the same way, but with the pose significantly changed and a signature(?) added.

Also, I just noticed that the nominator is also the uploader. Although the file is outside the timeframe for speedy deletion, this strengthens the argument for deletion. Brianjd (talk) 04:00, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

---

Deleted: per uploader request and above discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:59, 22 January 2023 (UTC)