Commons:Deletion requests/File:Angelina Ash 3.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Pornography. What educational purpose can this ever have? The Cleaner (talk) 18:23, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
Keep. –Tryphon☂ 18:31, 20 April 2010 (UTC)- Keep "Pornography" seems to be your opinion (and from your edits you seem to have an very broad personal notion of what you consider pornographic) and is not in itelf a reason for deletion. Purpose: To illustrate the actress shown and/or the practice shown. -- Infrogmation (talk) 19:21, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Invalid reason as Commons is not censored. Tabercil (talk) 03:26, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Jacopo Werther (talk) 08:11, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Not pornographic (using european standards), image of a porn actress who, by definition of her job, tends to be a lot naked (so it has intrinsic educational value), and most importantly image was provided with OTRS clearance, so there is not a personality rights (as far i see). Tm (talk) 03:41, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
Kept. Common Good (talk) 19:35, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
