Commons:Deletion requests/File:And the second glass must be filled.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Naked woman is peeing to the glass. Image illustrates nothing - because this is not even urophilia, which demands contact with urine. Pure vulgar nonsense. Andrzej19 (talk) 13:15, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
- Speedy
Keep At least this DR is openly about this being, per nominator, "pure vulgar nonsense". Well, i call this DR pure vulgar nonsense:
- 1- As there is an image of this same erotic show (that is in scope, and kept before) of this same women drinking urine from the same glass that appears in this same image, so here you have the contact with urine
- 2- Even if there wasnt any contact with urine, this is an image of urophilia, as urophiliais defined as "form of salirophilia (which is a form of paraphilia) in which sexual excitement is associated with the sight or thought of urine or urination.", so this image is also in scope of urophilia. Also Commons is not censored and it if you dont like it, dont look at it. Tm (talk) 13:32, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
- I would like not to deal with people who support such images - but I have to, sadly. This not about censoring - it is about the picture which ilustrates nothing. Naked woman with glass on her head? What value do you see in it? And You are right - this is commons which is to have good and encyclopedic ilustration - if You are seeing sth encyclopedic in it - I cannot argue, but this not a website with cheap amateur porn. Andrzej19 (talk) 20:33, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep Per previous DRs about the same woman and the same topic here, here and here ! As for these previous DRs, there's no valid reason for deletion : this is an encyclopedic illustration of both erotic shows (and this file shows a quite specific view of the topic, unshown in other files on the same theme) and urolagnia (which is, according to the Wikipedia definition itself, a "sexual excitement [...] associated with the sight or thought of urine or urination", therefore not only excitement due to a contact with urine as Andrzej19 says it). Apart from that, it's funny to read that Andrzej19 claims it's "not about censoring" while he also concludes by saying "this not a website with cheap amateur porn". Yeah, well, you've said it... --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 14:17, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Photo of a woman at an erotic show, showing something erotic. Seems reasonable to me. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:15, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
