Commons:Deletion requests/File:Agent 327 - Operation Barbershop-movie poster.jpg
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Fair use (Fair use)
Same as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Agent 327 - Operation Barbershop-movie poster alternate.jpg D-Kuru (talk) 23:29, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Speedy Kept: See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Agent 327 - Operation Barbershop-movie poster alternate.jpg --D-Kuru (talk) 23:31, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
This deletion request also applies to:
I have taken the file from the provided source from the Blender Cloud where the Creative Commons licence is displayed in the form of icons. The icons are Attribution and Share Alike. When you click on the licence icons it will not take you to a specific licence but to https://creativecommons.org/licenses/. Everything seems to be fine from this point of view so far.
In a different section of the same Blender Cloud website the file is licenced under CC-BY-ND. I have contacted the uploader and asked which licence is the correct one. He replyed: "The license is CC-BY-ND unfortunately."
The reason why I did not speedy delete the files is because I still have no answer to why the file is CC-BY-ND and how many other files are effected by this. In other words: How many files from category Agent 327: Operation Barbershop (Blender Foundation Shortfilm) can be kept and which should be deleted. Is the splash screen CC-BY-ND as well or is this one licenced under CC-BY-SA as it is indicated on the splash screens page.
If it eg. is said in some contract that they must not use CC-BY-SA, the files have to be deleted. If they could have used any licence we could keep the images under the OK-for-Commons licence BY-SA since CC licences can not be revoked once provided. Because of the length of the timespan from the upload and the ammount of other files licenced under the same it can not be seen as accidentally incorrectly used licence.
- For those who don't know: The Blender Cloud is all about providing learning or reference material for people learning or working with blender. Much of the content is hidden behind a paywall even the files themselves are freely licenced. Well, as it turned out only almost all of them. So it's very likely that a random file from the Blender Cloud is in fact freely licenced under a licence that can be used on Commons. Note that there is Blender Foundation Open Movie Projects that collects all - freely licenced - open movie projects by the Blender Foundation/Blender Animation Studio.
Once I have all the answers I think are needed I would close the DR. If any admin wants to rush forward and keep/delete the file I'm fine with it as well
--D-Kuru (talk) 19:29, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
Delete Tagging wrong may not be a reason to "speedy keep", we should mark {{Cc-by-nd}} instead. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 09:47, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Comment I got a reply by en:Ton Roosendaal himself and I will close the DR later today --D-Kuru (talk) 10:29, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
- I quote a part of the mail I got from Ton Roosendaal (head of the Blender Foundation and the film's producer):
- "We decided to limit the rights for the Agent artwork because it's a potential commercial film, and because the poster includes copyrighted material (all the logo's, the title, and the main character - which is the author's copyright)."
- I'll go through all files of Category:Agent 327: Operation Barbershop (Blender Foundation Shortfilm)
- File:Agent 327 - A feature film in progress.webm - video from YouTube from the blender conference. The file is freely licenced -> kept
- File:Agent 327 - Operation Barbershop-movie poster alternate.jpg - alternate movie poster. CC-BY-ND -> deleted
- File:Blender 2.79-splash.jpg - Splash screen of blender 2.79. The file is freely licenced and there is no indication that there is licenced under any different licence -> kept
- File:Blender 2.79.png - same as above -> kept
- File:Blender Foundation old studio.jpg - image from the blender website. The website licence information says that "Unless specified otherwise, the content on this website is available to share and use under the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike license." The link in the quote goes to the same CC-BY-SA-3.0 website as on the source website. The attribution has to be "Blender Foundation – www.blender.org" -> kept
- --D-Kuru (talk) 16:33, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by D-Kuru per nomination
