Commons:Deletion requests/File:Adrian Boult.jpeg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is licecend under Creatives commons BY-NC-ND on National Portrait Gallery homepage. Skivsamlare (talk) 09:39, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 23:54, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by AlbanGeller as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Unknown date of publication.. The file is ineligible for speedy deletion, because it has survived a regular deletion request. Taivo (talk) 07:59, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: I see no basis for the conclusion that because it is an image from around 1920, that it is PD. It was taken by the portrait studio Elliott & Fry, which was active until 1962. There are five cases under Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Consolidated_list_T-Z#United_Kingdom -- Known Author. In three of them the rule is pma 70. We don't assume that an image that is 100 years old is PD under pma 70. In one case, the rule is 1/1/2040. The only case that might make it PD is case 2, published before 1989, but more than 20 years after the author's death. That's possible, but must be proven. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:34, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]