Commons:Deletion requests/File:ANGEL OJEDA ROMERO.JPG
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Por diversos motivos deseo eliminar esta imagen. Avispa (talk) 08:43, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
Comment: Aunque la licencia utilizada es irrevocable, será trivial alcanzar el borramento de esta foto declarándola fuera del ámbito de Commons. -- Tuválkin ✉ 15:09, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Kept: No valid reason for deletion given. Krd 08:20, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
uploader requested deletion (ticket:2015121710025794), unused personal image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:31, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: This is a fine messy mess. So, we have this Mr. Upper Case, apparently not notable, who uploaded a vanity shot to Commons in Oct.2008. It is licensed as a selfie («trabajo propio»), though it might be someone else’s photography work — and therefore a copyvio.
- Almost 5 years later, Mr. Upper Case decides he doesn’t want his portrait in Commons anymore, for unknown reasons (maybe a vanity page in wp:es got deleted as off scope?, maybe because one Mary Paz left him a mocking note?), and, half a year after an unsucessful attempt at concealing the full name he had made public in 2008, files in a deletion request (see above). Therein, Mr. Upper Case is informed that while Coomons-accepted licenses are irrevocable, he could get his pic deleted if off-scopeness is argued. This suggestion is followed by cricket chirping and the pic is kept.
- Suddenly, 15 months later, Mr. Upper Case decides to remove his likeness from Commons once again, and, instead of following the sensible advice given the the first DR, he goes on to undertake the following:
- Whine at OTRS — diverting volonteer time and effort from tasks for which OTRS is actually for —, where his plea was nonetheless heard.
- Vandalize the photo at Commons (see file history).
- Vandalize the photo’s file page at Commons.
- Well, we do have something called courtesy deletions, but this case only qualifies for an uncourtesy deletion. This photo is a possible copyvio, a portrait of an off-scope nobody, with scarce additional value (hmm: Category:Portraits with bokeh?, Category:Surplus US Army jackets?), so it could be deleted without a loss for Commons — but this user should be blocked for vandalism. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 23:55, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per Tuvalkin --Krd 16:38, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
