Commons:Deletion requests/File:3D Human Penis Erected.png
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Out of project scope: Replaceable and low quality pornographic content Econt (talk) 22:41, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Unused file. Cathfolant (talk) 21:45, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
Kept: 3D-Illustration, not low quality, not necessarily replaceble Krd 15:52, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
pornographic content with no educational benefit OlafTheScientist (talk) 22:01, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Kept in 2014, but not very good quality for 2023. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:18, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
- What type is fashionable these days? Delete. 186.174.67.81 23:35, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
- Question Is that a serious question? I doubt it. The point is that a lot of better-quality photos have been uploaded in the last 9 years, let alone 15 years, as this is a 2008 upload. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:10, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- Question Are there other similar 3D models that are of higher quality? I could see some areas in which you wouldn't want to use a real picture. However, if the image is redundant to another better picture, it could be deleted. Chamaemelum (talk) 20:11, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason for deletion, and I do not see other rendered images of higher quality. --RAN (talk) 02:02, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
- What in the world is happening here?! This file - as well as any other similar content - is just trash! Don't you see that??? The one who uploaded that is making a hoax! If wikipedia/wikimedia wants to be a seroius organisation, than there is only ONE option: DELETE all pornographic content! We are an encyclopedia, but not a sex page! This is just ridiculous! -- OlafTheScientist (talk) 20:58, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:36, 30 November 2023 (UTC)