Commons:Deletion requests/File:13-08-08-hongkong-by-RalfR-076.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by 1Veertje as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: derivative work Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:57, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
- In my opinion: {{FoP-Hong Kong}} --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:08, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
- For details see Commons:FOP#Hong_Kong. --Túrelio (talk) 07:46, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
- This figures are here in Hongkong in all corners of the Town. --Ralf Roleček 06:00, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
Delete FOP says: "if the object is permanently situated in a public place or in premises open to the public.". As these toys are not permanently exhibited, they are protected with copyright, isn't it? COM:TOYS should be proper page. Taivo (talk) 11:19, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
Question At what point is an object considered permanent? --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:01, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
Comment I think, that permanently installed object is meant to be in its place during its whole employment duration. These objects are not meant to be there, until they perish. And after removing they do not go straight into dumping ground (at least I feel so). Taivo (talk) 13:35, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
- CommentAFAIK, those things go into the dumpster at the end of the campaign. They might reuse some parts. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 15:23, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
- look at it this way: the location this is placed at is completely irrelevant to the design. Very late in the process of this being placed there was the location a relevant factor. The reason it had been placed is to promote a current event: the showing of a movie. It being a 3D object makes it no different than if it were a 2D object copyright wise. - Vera (talk) 16:01, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Doesn't appear to be permanently situated. If someone has a credible source explicitly proving this wrong, then leave me a message and I'll restore it FASTILY 01:07, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
