Commons:Deletion requests/File:江戸時代の眼鏡.JPG
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by Licsak as no permission.
- Keep: What permission is needed for PD images? ネイ (talk) 14:19, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- This image is a derivative of the digitized material of "Sanpoutaizenshinanguruma" （算法大全指南車）by the National Institute of Japanese Literature https://kokusho.nijl.ac.jp/biblio/100300497/107, but according to their usage guide, it is licensed under the license: "Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License CC BY-SA". According to the Wikimedia Commons'S basic rules, Commons:2D copying should be applied to faithful reproductions of old books whose copyrights have expired, but the original scan data is watermarked with 「小泉吉永作成」(created by Yoshinaga Koizumi) and is inconsistent with the Commons license terms. See File talk:江戸時代の眼鏡.JPG. Licsak (talk) 14:25, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the explanation - then, my opinion is still keep because (1) adding a watermark without creativity does not create new copyright, (2) the uploaded image does not contain the watermark at all. ネイ (talk) 15:36, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: I think that File:江戸時代の眼鏡.JPG is not from https://kokusho.nijl.ac.jp/biblio/100300497/107 . They seem to be different copies printed from the same woodblock. For example, the teardrop-shaped pattern on the foot of the upper right screen (byōbu) is slightly different. Several prints/re-issues of this book survived eg. [1]. For this File:江戸時代の眼鏡.JPG , only the uploader User:写真家 knows which print it came from. My citation in :ja:眼鏡 2024-05-06T14:26:02 merely proves that the original picture did indeed exist by 1801, not necessarily the same print or website. --Wotheina (talk) 00:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: the original image is undoubtedly in PD, no matter what the file is derived from. --Yasu (talk) 15:46, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
