Commons:Deletion requests/File:みかんちゃん.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by Tiven2240 as no permission (No permission since). The uploders has no proof that the image is own work. When said the author to send the permissions via OTRS the uploders argues not to do so. There is a doubt that the image is not own as it seems unsharp as well as retouched and cropped. The uploders refusal to OTRS about the image gives me the inspiration to start the DR. ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 01:14, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
- i took picture originally whole body. and just trim and upload around the face. that all. i have whole copyright.
- your comment is bull shit. study hard.--TCC00313 (talk) 01:58, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
- "no permission" never means "There is a doubt that the image is not own"--TCC00313 (talk) 02:57, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
- if every unsharp photos are doubtful, that is ridiculous!--TCC00313 (talk) 06:21, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
Delete Out of Scope.she is private person. file:Mikansan.jpg and file:みかんちゃん２.jpg too. --eien20 (talk) 17:13, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
Keep she is a model of some magazines, and has been guest speaker in some big event for few years , so she is NOT Out of Scope.(See [1])--TCC00313 (talk) 23:39, 11 June 2017 (UTC)--TCC00313 (talk) 00:06, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
- Can you read [Ticket#2017061010009993]? it tells "この写真を他の場所で公開したことがおありですか？ そうでない場合、当窓口としてはお手伝いできることはありません。","今回は、削除依頼でコミュニティを説得していただくしかないのではないかと思います。トリミング前の画像や連続して前後に撮影された写真をアップロードして提示すると説得に役立つかもしれません。". And it hasn't been previously published. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TCC00313 (トーク • 投稿記録) 23:04, 11 June 2017 (UTC)--TCC00313 (トーク) 23:06, 11 June 2017 (UTC)--TCC00313 (talk) 01:48, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
- "she is private person or not" is out of scope of this discussion.--TCC00313 (talk) 04:08, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Poor quality. No useful description or categories. Used only in an article that will be soon deleted for lack of notability. Violates COM:ADVERT. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:47, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
