Commons:Deletion requests/File:Могила П.К.Сенько на о. Буромского.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 10:05, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The image on the gravestone was made on the basis of a 1949 photograph. At the moment there is no evidence that the author of this photo gave the applicants copyright. -- НоуФрост (talk) 18:40, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unnecessary FoP in Russia This gravestone is located in the cemetery on the island of Buromsky . The cemetery on Buromsky island is HSM No.9 in accordance with the Antarctic Treaty [1](Revised List of Antarctic Historic Sites and Monuments). According to the Treaty, its territory does not fall under the jurisdiction (except visiting it scientists) of any of the States - parties of the Treaty and the objects located on it are free for photographing, replication and distribution. The author, who took a photo of the gravestone, issued a permit for its free distribution under this license. No reason to delete — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 178.71.133.170 (talk) 15:28, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The release date of the article, where the -- НоуФрост cut out the photo RPR (page 47), 2016, the date of manufacture of the plate 2000 (see the documents for the manufacture of plates [https://drive.google.com/file/d/195xMyawM1JrN45D_PXvf7bFcGpMWBNSL/view payed order on production according to the sketch of the customer who granted all rights of the free distribution of plate's images. Following the logic of the -- НоуФрост, on the plate was used a photo wich was published 16 years after the plate was made — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 178.71.133.170 (talk) 18:36, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Free availability of a similar image from open sources on the Internet "Russian Polar Reasearches magazine RPR p.47. Certified written permission issued by this magazine for free distribution , including all posted images (inside documents of the OTRS Ticket#2018011510006814). Certified permission issued by author of photography inside Ticket#2019030410002931 . Certified permission issued by customer of gravestone with documents on payed order inside Ticket#2019030410004939. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 178.70.120.143 (talk) 14:04, 7 March 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 178.70.120.143 (talk) 14:10, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image has not been issued a ticket OTRS. -- НоуФрост (talk) 14:12, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
you mean reply on permission request with ticket number 2018011510006814 ? yes, in violation of present inside of OTRS Ticket#2018011510006814 documents , namely the certified written permission issued by Russian Polar Researches magazine (wich is freely available as open source in Internet RPR-25) for free distribution this and all other images available on pages 46-48 under Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 1.0, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0 license. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 92.100.190.86 (talk) 17:12, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I once again inform you that the permission for this photo is not confirmed - this photo. As part of this ticket, my OTRS colleague was granted permission for text only. -- НоуФрост (talk) 17:56, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Разрешение подтверждено только на текст в статье «Павел Кононович Сенько. К столетию со дня рождения» из журнала «Российские полярные исследования», OTRS–тикет 2018011510006814. С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 19:55, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
to -- НоуФрост yes, namely on this and other photos on pages 46-48 that respected magazine in the public domain gave permission under Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 1.0, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0 license, but your colleague once made the wrong decision and is now trying to make it double when he nominated a photo of the gravestone that has the permission of the author of the photo to be removed. At the same time you're referring to a magazine photo published 16 years after gravestone was made... — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 178.71.141.192 (talk) 20:08, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I refer to the photo of 1949 -- НоуФрост (talk) 20:23, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
no. following link that you insert above this photo with image that you and your colleague cut out from page 47 here RPR-25 Year 2016, everyone can compare and verify that your image from a magazine published 16 years after the gravestone was made in year 2000. In addition to which the magazine issued a permission for free distribution under Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 1.0, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0 license. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 178.66.236.51 (talk) 23:37, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
"which"? No, not everyone. I can check - I am an OTRS agent. You report false information. Sealle? -- НоуФрост (talk) 23:42, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
no false information. citation from permission of magazine from January, 2018:
"Настоящим журнал «Российские полярные исследования» , заявляет, что является единственными обладателем исключительных авторских прав на следующее произведение, выполненное автором (ФИО) , включающее    фотографии ...Ссылка на  произведение: RPR...Журнал «Российские полярные исследования» согласен на частичное или полное воспроизведение (копирование ) данного  произведения на условиях свободной лицензии Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ , либо иной открытой лицензии на выбор) или более новой." 

Translation from russian : "The magazine "Russian polar research" hereby declares that it is the sole owner of the exclusive copyright to the following work, made by the author (data) ,including photos ... Link to work: RPR The magazine "Russian polar research" agrees to partial or full reproduction (copying ) of this work under the terms of a free license Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/, or other open license to choose from) or newer." End of citation.

This document inside ticket 2018011510006814, you wish receive it repeatedly? In addition, repeatedly, article in magazine published 16 year after gravestone was made. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 178.66.236.51 (talk) 00:44, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Endless story"... Volunteers, it's time to finish this kind of "dancing on the bones" of long-dead people you started . . Delete file.--Николай Сенько (talk) 06:53, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DeletionFooter|KEPT|I accept the OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 17:02, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Taivo, добрый день. А как вы можете подтвердить разрешение OTRS (которого никто не выдавал) на производное изображение с фотографии, права на которую не принадлежат фотографу? И там это не единственная проблема в тикете. Вы OTRS агент? У вас есть доступ к тикету? -- НоуФрост (talk) 17:11, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I re-opened the request. OTRS-member is needed to close that. Taivo (talk) 20:27, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: OTRS declined release. --JuTa 19:10, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]