Category talk:Tiger (P)
(Redirected from Category talk:Panzerkampfwagen VI Tiger (P))
This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Panzerkampfwagen VI is a designation used for a series of different heavy tank designs which are not sub-sets of each other. This should be a dab or parent category pointing to each of the separate design categories. Josh (talk) 22:12, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
- Category:Panzerkampfwagen VI
- Category:Durchbruchswagen 1 (no media at this time, create if it is added)
- Category:Durchbruchswagen 2 (early heavy tank development)
- Category:VK 30.01 (H) (30 ton-class development design by Henschel)
- Category:Sturer Emil (SPG on VK 30.01 (H) chassis)
- Category:VK 30.01 (P) (30 ton-class development design by Porsche)
- Category:Tiger I (Panzerkampfwagen VI Ausf. E) (the classic Henschel design)
- Category:VK 36.01 (H) (36 ton-class development chassis for the Tiger I)
- Category:Sturmtiger (Sturmmorser Tiger) (assault mortar on Tiger I chassis)
- Category:Bergetiger (Bergepanzer Tiger) (engineering vehicle using Tiger I chassis)
- Category:Tiger (P) (heavier Porsche design to rival Tiger I, but not put in production)
- Category:Panzerjäger Tiger (P) (Ferdinand/Elefant) (heavy tank destroyer based on Tiger (P))
- Category:Bergepanzer Tiger (P) (engineering vehicle using Tiger (P) chassis)
- Category:Tiger II (Panzerkampfwagen VI Ausf. B/Konigstiger) (an even heavier design by Henschel)
- Category:Jagdtiger (tank destroyer based on Tiger II)
- Category:Geschützwagen Tiger (artillery carrier based on Tiger II)
Josh (talk) 23:06, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Joshbaumgartner: No opposition, if you want to go ahead with this. - Themightyquill (talk) 08:26, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Joshbaumgartner: Well, I've started on sorting them out. GraemeLeggett (talk) 17:41, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- @GraemeLeggett: Thanks, I must have missed the ping back in 2019 for some reason. Josh (talk) 23:50, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Joshbaumgartner: Well, I've started on sorting them out. GraemeLeggett (talk) 17:41, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
@Themightyquill and GraemeLeggett: Closed (no objections; re-align per proposal) Josh (talk) 23:50, 28 April 2021 (UTC)