User talk:Polentarion

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Polentarion!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 16:56, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Waldorfstatlercookies.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Andibrunt (talk) 17:13, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Butler Servants.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Andibrunt (talk) 22:08, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ich hatte gar nicht bemerkt, dass Du der Uploader auf Commons warst, Serten. Bitte glaube nicht blind irgendwelchen Lizenzen auf Flickr, sondern frage Dich selbst, ob die Flickr-User wirklich die Inhaber der Urheberrecht sein können. Dann kann man sich solche Löschdiskussionen wie bei den Muppets-Cookies oder bei Mr. Carson sparen.--Andibrunt (talk) 22:16, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
OK, danke für den hinweis. Das hatte ich so nicht verstanden gehabt, da bin ich gelegentlich noch auf Hilfe angewiesen. Von mi aus kann das schnellgelöscht werden. Serten (talk) 00:06, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Waldorf Statler Advertisement.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

--Kungfuman (talk) 13:11, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

[edit]

23:01, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Sydney Opera House French Tricolour.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

CennoxX (talk) 18:44, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:RSWöltingerodev2001Lücke.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, — Racconish ☎ 17:58, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thnx Honey for the translation. The list with the licencing is at commons. Youre way to quick with deletion requests. Polentarion (talk) 18:29, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reifensteiner Schule

[edit]

Du hast ja interessante Bilder hochgeladen, einschließlich der Reifensteiner /Beinröder Bilder (fehlt nur noch die die Genehmigung des Urhebers, die Du hoffentlich bekommen wirst). Für die Reifensteiner Bilder habe ich mal eine eigene Kat. unter "Landfrauenschule Reifenstein" angelegt, wäre der Kat.-Name "Reifensteiner Schule Reifenstein" besser gewesen oder kann man das auch so stehen lassen? Ich selber kannte es dort nur als Landfrauenschule. Und eine zweite Frage: war die Schule in Beinrode wirklich selbstständig (wie auf der Seite des Reifensteiner Verbandes), dann würde ich auch dort eine eigene Kat. anlegen oder war sie ein Teil der Reifensteiner Schule, da die beiden Orte nur wenige Kilometer auseinander liegen und das ehemalige Gut/Vorwerk Beinrode auch zum Kloster Reifenstein gehörte.--79.214er (talk) 10:52, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merci für den Hinweis. Die formelle Freigabe hatte ich schon länger vorliegen und schon vor dem Einstellen weitergeleitet, jetzt auch noch mit einer Liste der Dateinamen. Die sind halt mit dem Löschen wie üblich schneller als mit dem Freigeben. Es gibt nun Reifensteiner Schulen, die dem Verband selbst gehörten, und assozierte, nach den Reifensteiner Prinzipien arbeitende mit anderen Trägern. Beinrode hatte eine eigene Schulnadel, von daher selbständig. Ich würde aktuell alle neueingestellten Bilder noch unter meiner Oberkat führen. Die Unterteilung sollte man imho normalerweise mit einer separaten Ortskategorie machen. Nimm aber mal das heutige Physikzentrum Bad Honnef, das ist die frühere reifensteiner Böckingschule. Polentarion (talk) 14:04, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And also:

Yours sincerely, — Racconish ☎ 18:22, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Further to your explanations, I have added a template to show you had sent a mail and OTRS was pending on all the above files and removed the template for lack of permission on all the files where I had put it. Please understand the template indicating OTRS is pending should be on each concerned file. If there is any remaining problem, let me know. Sorry for the inconvenience. Cheers, — Racconish ☎ 18:35, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thnx! Polentarion (talk) 18:51, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
File:Waldorf Statler Wall Painting.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 16:34, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]