User talk:Poco a poco/2016-02

Archives 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alberite de San Juan, Zaragoza, España, 2016-01-03, DD 24.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:48, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ermita del Santo Cristo, Almonte, Huelva, España, 2015-12-07, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:50, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de San Marcos, El Puerto de Santa María, España, 2015-12-08, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:11, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo del Desnarigado, Ceuta, España, 2015-12-10, DD 35.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 20:52, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Santiago Cádiz, España, 2015-12-08, DD 79.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:11, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colegiata, Medinaceli, Soria, España, 2015-12-28, DD 101.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:11, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Comercio en la plaza del 9 de abril de 1947, Tánger, Marruecos, 2015-12-11, DD 75.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:11, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alparrache, Soria, España, 2015-12-29, DD 46.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:53, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de Santa María, Sigüenza, España, 2015-12-28, DD 144.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please apply a gradient brightness filter at the right side; yet it is overexposed. --Cccefalon 07:54, 30 January 2016 (UTC)  Done --Poco a poco 09:39, 30 January 2016 (UTC) Well done --Cccefalon 09:44, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Translation needed:

Hi! Could you please translate this watchlist notice into ES? Thanks in advance! --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 03:37, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

[[Commons:Photo challenge]]''': Time to vote for [[Commons:Photo challenge/2016 - January - Diagonals/Voting|'''Diagonals''' (January)]] and [[Commons:Photo challenge/2016 - January - Wheels/Voting|'''Wheels''' (January)]]. Submit your entries for [[Commons:Photo challenge/2016 - February - Mailboxes|'''Mailboxes''' (February)]] and [[Commons:Photo challenge/2016 - February - Reflections|'''Reflections''' (February)]]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Santa María de Huerta, Santa María de Huerta Soria, España, 2015-12-28, DD 46-48 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 02:20, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lucena de Jalón, Zaragoza, España, 2015-12-30, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 02:22, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lobo marino (Zalophus californianus wollebaeki), Punta Pitt, isla de San Cristóbal, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-24, DD 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 02:22, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Nuestra Señora de África, Ceuta, España, 2015-12-10, DD 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 16:02, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de Santa María, Sigüenza, España, 2015-12-28, DD 138.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:14, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lobo marino (Zalophus californianus wollebaeki), Punta Pitt, isla de San Cristóbal, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-24, DD 78.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rolf H. 04:53, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ermita del Rocío, El Rocío, Huelva, España, 2015-12-07, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 03:35, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mezquita Muley El Mehdi, Ceuta, España, 2015-12-10, DD 30.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:01, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Palacio de Cultura, Tirana, Albania, 2014-04-17, DD 11.JPG

Yours sincerely, Themightyquill (talk) 14:20, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Facultad de Geografía e Historia, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, España, 2015-12-06, DD 79.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 17:56, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo, Chipiona, España, 2015-12-08, DD 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:52, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Santa María de Huerta, Santa María de Huerta Soria, España, 2015-12-28, DD 09-11 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:16, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

What to do?

Hi again DD. What to do with this WLM winner? Is it good for FP? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 17:44, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

I fixed the ccw tilt. Good now? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 02:06, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Arion: sorry for the late answer. I've been on a photographic tour with none or very limited Internet access until now. I saw you wirhdraw the nomination. Apart from the sharpness, which could be better, there is also visible CA. Poco² 06:53, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Miguel, Almazán, Soria, España, 2015-12-29, DD 67.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Madinat Jumeirah-Dubai3303.JPG

File:Madinat Jumeirah-Dubai3303.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2003:88:6A5D:E257:E05F:7D2C:9B67:E279 00:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Towards a New Wikimania results

Last December, I invited you to share your views on the value of Wikimedia conferences and the planning process of Wikimania. We have completed analysis of these results and have prepared this report summarizing your feedback and important changes for Wikimania starting in 2018 as an experiment. Feedback and comments are welcome at the discussion page. Thank you so much for your participation. I JethroBT (WMF), Community Resources, 22:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ermita de San Roque, Borobia, Soria, España, 2016-01-02, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:28, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gabasa, Huesca, España, 2015-12-23, DD 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp photo, good perspective, only the house looks a bit overexposed when I am making the photo much larger, but still no doubts a Q1one --Michielverbeek 14:27, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fuente de las Galeras, El Puerto de Santa María, España, 2015-12-08, DD 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, sharp image with a clear subject. --Balon Greyjoy 17:12, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Comercio en la plaza del 9 de abril de 1947, Tánger, Marruecos, 2015-12-11, DD 78.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Faro, Chipiona, España, 2015-12-08, DD 16-18 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:39, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Iglesia de La Compañía, Quito, Ecuador, 2015-07-22, DD 116-118 HDR.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Iglesia de La Compañía, Quito, Ecuador, 2015-07-22, DD 116-118 HDR.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de Santa Catalina, Tarifa, Cádiz, España, 2015-12-09, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:44, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iguana marina (Amblyrhynchus cristatus), isla Lobos, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-25, DD 51.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Costa de Ceuta, España, 2015-12-10, DD 24.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:26, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de Sevilla, Sevilla, España, 2015-12-06, DD 106-108 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:09, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Pedro, Ariza, Zaragoza, España, 2015-12-29, DD 102.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:34, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Santa María de Huerta, Santa María de Huerta Soria, España, 2015-12-28, DD 28-30 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:34, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Machu Picchu, Perú, 2015-07-30, DD 66.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:34, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calcena, Zaragoza, España, 2016-01-02, DD 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:34, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Convento de Santa Isabel, Medinaceli, Soria, España, 2015-12-28, DD 69.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:08, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crucero, Catedral de Sevilla, Sevilla, España, 2015-12-06, DD 94-96 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:46, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Nuestra Señora de África, Ceuta, España, 2015-12-10, DD 75-77 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:46, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ayuntamiento, Luceni, Zaragoza, España, 2015-12-31, DD 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 17:49, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ciervo común (Cervus elaphus), Parque de Doñana, España, 2015-12-07, DD 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 17:48, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ermita de la Virgen de la Mencalilla, Almazul, Soria, España, 2015-12-29, DD 32.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:41, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Iglesia de San Pedro, Ariza, Zaragoza, España, 2015-12-29, DD 102.JPG

Hallo Diego! Ich würde das Bild gern bei com:fpc vorstellen, aber ich glaube, die Chancen dort wären größer, wenn da oben links in der Ecke kein Lieferwagen stehen würde. Mein Vorschlag wäre, das Foto links soweit zu beschneiden, daß der aus dem Bild rausfällt. Oder besser oben was abschneiden? Bin mir nicht ganz sicher. Oder unverändert vorschlagen und das Risiko eingehen, daß das Auto angemeckert wird? Was hältst du von der Idee? -- Smial (talk) 08:59, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Smialǃ Du hast dir was interessantes ausgesucht...ich hatte nich bei diesem Bild an einem möglichen FP gedacht, aber originell ist es schon. Einen solchen Blick von einer Kirche habe ich tatsächlich nur damals gesehen.

Ich habe das Bild beschnitten, die Kurven ein bisschen verbessern (insb. Schatten) und auch den WA etwas angepasst. Jetzt bin ich sehr gespannt :) Vielen vielen Dank für deine Initiative!!! Poco² 11:42, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Ich hab draufgeguggt, und es hat sofort funktioniert. Da ist dieses schöne, sanfte Licht, die vielen Details, das Gewusel der gedrängten Häuser und Dächer. Ich find's ein tolles Beispiel für ein dokumentarisch wertvolles Foto, das auch noch richtig was für's Auge hergibt. Bin auch gespannt, ob es genug Zustimmung erntet, denn es ist ja gerade nicht eins dieser typischen knallbunten Fotos in hartem Sonnenlicht mit tiefblauem Polarisationsfilter- (oder Bildbearbeitungs-) Himmel -- Smial (talk) 12:53, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Featured Picture Nomination

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that the image Iglesia de San Pedro, Ariza, Zaragoza, España, 2015-12-29, DD 102.JPG, which was created or uploaded by you, has been nominated for featured picture status; have a look at the nomination page. Thank you and good luck! -- Smial (talk) 12:56, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jirueque, Guadalajara, España, 2015-12-28, DD 159.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 14:08, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fuente, Plaza Virgen del Rocío, Almonte, Huelva, España, 2015-12-07, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp photo. good focus to the main object --Michielverbeek 23:36, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hermandad de La Palma, El Rocío, Huelva, España, 2015-12-07, DD 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Laitche 03:09, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kasbah, Tánger, Marruecos, 2015-12-11, DD 27.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 01:10, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Santa María de Huerta, Santa María de Huerta Soria, España, 2015-12-28, DD 43-45 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 01:10, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calle en Vejer de la Frontera, Cádiz, España, 2015-12-09, DD 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Laitche 03:12, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hortezuela de Océn, Guadalajara, España, 2016-01-05, DD 39.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:08, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Nuestra Señora de África, Ceuta, España, 2015-12-10, DD 68-69 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:40, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lagartija de lava de San Cristóbal (Microlophus bivittatus), Punta Pitt, isla de San Cristóbal, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-24, DD 46.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:21, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lago Titicaca, Puno, Perú, 2015-08-01, DD 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:45, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Faro, Chipiona, España, 2015-12-08, DD 27.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I would crop out some part of the sky --A.Savin 14:10, 12 February 2016 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 19:38, 13 February 2016 (UTC) Good quality. --A.Savin 23:17, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de San Marcos, El Puerto de Santa María, España, 2015-12-08, DD 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:37, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sacsayhuamán, Cusco, Perú, 2015-07-31, DD 28-30 PAN.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sacsayhuamán, Cusco, Perú, 2015-07-31, DD 28-30 PAN.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giralda, Sevilla, España, 2015-12-06, DD 133-135 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:17, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Santa María de Huerta, Santa María de Huerta Soria, España, 2015-12-28, DD 52-54 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:30, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cementerio judío, Tánger, Marruecos, 2015-12-11, DD 30.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ayuntamiento, Ceuta, España, 2015-12-10, DD 66.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:58, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de Cádiz, España, 2015-12-08, DD 57-59 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:52, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo del Desnarigado, Ceuta, España, 2015-12-10, DD 44.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --A.Savin 15:09, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baños árabes, Ceuta, España, 2015-12-10, DD 47.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:52, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Iglesia de San Francisco, Quito, Ecuador, 2015-07-22, DD 217-219 HDR.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Iglesia de San Francisco, Quito, Ecuador, 2015-07-22, DD 217-219 HDR.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Next FP Nomination

I like this one. I will support if you nominate it. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:08, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi Arion, thanks, that is good to know. Right now I cannot nominate anything as I have 2 running FPCs, but this one is planned (sooner or later) as it is in my FPC cat Category:FP candidates by User:Poco a poco. Thanks, Poco² 09:44, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Thank you! Will you watch the Olympics Games? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 02:21, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

I imagine, you mean watching them live, right?. No, it will not be possible, this summer I have to stay at work. Sorry, Poco² 09:32, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de Somaén, Soria, España, 2015-12-28, DD 64.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Panoramic. We need more of those. Good quality. --Caballero1967 21:57, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Comandancia General, Ceuta, España, 2015-12-10, DD 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:22, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hospital San Juan de Dios, El Puerto de Santa María, España, 2015-12-08, DD 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:06, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nuévalos, Zaragoza, España, 2016-01-05, DD 04-06 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:06, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Miñosa, Guadalajara, España, 2015-12-28, DD 149.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:06, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maras, Perú, 2015-07-30, DD 25.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Maybe a little harsh light conditions though. --Ximonic 20:02, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Los Paredones, Nazca, Perú, 2015-07-29, DD 20.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rftblr 21:04, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Faro, Chipiona, España, 2015-12-08, DD 14-15 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments looks a little bit tilted CW --Shansov.net 19:22, 17 February 2016 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 20:46, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ermita de la Virgen de la Mencalilla, Almazul, Soria, España, 2015-12-29, DD 33.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Shansov.net 19:28, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Formaciones rocosas, Selas, Guadalajara, España, 2016-01-05, DD 24.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:09, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Faro, Chipiona, España, 2015-12-08, DD 28.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rftblr 19:58, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ermita del Rocío, El Rocío, Huelva, España, 2015-12-07, DD 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:43, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Nuestra Señora de África, Ceuta, España, 2015-12-10, DD 73-74 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:43, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Opinion

Do like you this one? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:26, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi Arion, indeed, I like it. The only problem I see is the size/resolution, but it could get through Poco² 15:44, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Salineras de Maras, Maras, Perú, 2015-07-30, DD 03-07 PAN.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Salineras de Maras, Maras, Perú, 2015-07-30, DD 03-07 PAN.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:06, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ermita derruida, Deza, Soria, España, 2015-12-29, DD 27.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:40, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ermita del Santo Cristo, Almonte, Huelva, España, 2015-12-07, DD 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 09:42, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lucena de Jalón, Zaragoza, España, 2015-12-30, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 09:42, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sacsayhuamán, Cusco, Perú, 2015-07-31, DD 28-30 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 09:42, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Miguel, Jerez de la Frontera, España, 2015-12-07, DD 52.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 11:20, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia San Lázaro, Lima, Perú, 2015-07-28, DD 111.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:57, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fuente, Borjabad, Soria, España, 2015-12-29, DD 52.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:29, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Santa María de Huerta, Santa María de Huerta Soria, España, 2015-12-28, DD 18-20 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:30, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cementerio judío, Tánger, Marruecos, 2015-12-11, DD 31.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 13:06, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Iglesia de San Francisco, Quito, Ecuador, 2015-07-22, DD 171-173 HDR.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Iglesia de San Francisco, Quito, Ecuador, 2015-07-22, DD 171-173 HDR.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Costa de isla Santa Cruz, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-26, DD 49.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ. --Palauenc05 11:45, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de San Isidoro del Campo, Santiponce, Sevilla, España, 2015-12-06, DD 54.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ. --Palauenc05 11:45, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa típica, Chipiona, España, 2015-12-08, DD 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:17, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deposito de agua, Santiponce, Sevilla, España, 2015-12-06, DD 48.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Seems to be what skew (inclined to the left) but for me good quality.--Famberhorst 16:35, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aguas Calientes, Cuzco, Perú, 2015-07-30, DD 69.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ. --Palauenc05 11:47, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ermita del Cristo de las Misericordias, Chipiona, España, 2015-12-08, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QC, no important issues Ezarate 15:41, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Almajano, Soria, España, 2016-01-03, DD 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:59, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beratón, Soria, España, 2016-01-02, DD 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 20:02, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cabo Espartel, Marruecos, 2015-12-11, DD 04-06 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:56, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alparrache, Soria, España, 2015-12-29, DD 45.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:53, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anfiteatro de las ruinas romanas de Itálica, Santiponce, Sevilla, España, 2015-12-06, DD 04-07 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:53, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Capilla de Nuestra Señora de Europa, Algeciras, Cádiz, España, 2015-12-09, DD 06-08 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luceni, Zaragoza, España, 2015-12-31, DD 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 13:09, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estatua de la Cobijada, Vejer de la Frontera, Cádiz, España, 2015-12-09, DD 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ayuntamiento, Chipiona, España, 2015-12-08, DD 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:55, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ayuntamiento, Coscurita, Soria, España, 2015-12-29, DD 88.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:55, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de Santa Catalina, Tarifa, Cádiz, España, 2015-12-09, DD 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 19:22, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cillas, Guadalajara, España, 2016-01-05, DD 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 20:42, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altar de plata, Catedral de Sevilla, Sevilla, España, 2015-12-06, DD 93.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:21, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baños árabes, Ceuta, España, 2015-12-10, DD 48.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Blueish IMHO, maybe some fringes to the right. --C messier 20:01, 22 February 2016 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 20:50, 23 February 2016 (UTC)  Support OK. --C messier 20:51, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

QIs nachbearbeiten

Hallo Poco a poco,

da Du Admin bei Wikicommons bist, weisst Du vielleicht die Antwort auf meine Frage: Wenn Du ein Foto hast, das als QI gewählt worden ist, und dann feststellst, dass es trotzdem noch Fehler hat oder man es verbessern könnte, kann man dann neue Versionen hochladen? Eigentlich wäre das ja nicht richtig, weil es ja nicht im neuen Zustand gewählt worden ist. D. h., ich könnte es beim Verbessern verschlechtern (aus welchen Gründen auch immer). Andererseits habe ich schon ein, zwei Bilder, bei denen mir im Nachhinein etwas aufgefallen ist, was korrigiert werden könnte.

Vielen Dank im Voraus für Deine Antwort!

¡Saludos desde Vitoria!

--Basotxerri (talk) 19:48, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Hola Basotxerri, aunque no tengo claro porqué sólo un administrador iba a poner responder a algo así: claro que puedes mejorar las imágenes que tienen el sello de QI, así como FP, siempre y cuando el cambio no sea esencial (composición, por ejemplo). Yo mejoro a menudo muchas imágenes mías independientemente de si tienen algún galardón. Intentar mejorar una imagen y terminar empeorándola me parece algo accidental, pero si tienes alguna duda, me puedes consultar. Saludos, Poco² 20:23, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Perfecto, ¡muchas gracias por la respuesta! Comprobaré los casos que he visto y haré algunas modificaciones. Tengo una foto que necesitaba una corrección de perspectiva, entonces no sabía cómo hacerlo y Medium69 fue tan amable de corregirlo. Claro, no tenía el RAW y supongo que saldrá mejor si se hace directamente en Lightroom. Ahora sí lo podría hacer yo. En otra foto he visto que el balance de blancos podría ser más acertado. Viele Grüsse! --Basotxerri (talk) 21:24, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cessna 205, Aeródromo de Nazca, Perú, 2015-07-29, DD 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:24, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral, Jerez de la Frontera, España, 2015-12-07, DD 21-23 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:06, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fuentelmonge, Soria, España, 2015-12-29, DD 97.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:24, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Formaciones rocosas, Selas, Guadalajara, España, 2016-01-05, DD 26.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:56, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Faro del cabo de Trafalgar, Zahora, Cádiz, España, 2015-12-09, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 06:50, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Aircraft

¡Diego, que el plural de aircraft queda igual! --Kadellar (talk) 09:49, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Glup, ok, gracias por el aviso, Kadellar. Poco² 10:21, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Laguna de Salinas, Arequipa, Perú, 2015-08-02, DD 16-19 PAN.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Laguna de Salinas, Arequipa, Perú, 2015-08-02, DD 16-19 PAN.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fuentes de Magaña, Soria, España, 2016-01-03, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:09, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giralda, Sevilla, España, 2015-12-06, DD 83.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:44, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gabasa, Huesca, España, 2015-12-23, DD 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:09, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fuencaliente de Medinaceli, Soria, España, 2015-12-28, DD 110.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:09, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ermita del Rocío, El Rocío, Huelva, España, 2015-12-07, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:09, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia Santa Rosa, Lima, Perú, 2015-07-28, DD 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good enough to be a Q1photo, but the composition does not impress me --Michielverbeek 21:48, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Faro, Chipiona, España, 2015-12-08, DD 25-26 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:23, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ermita del Rocío, El Rocío, Huelva, España, 2015-12-07, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 20:52, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cuervo grande (Corvus corax), Arcos de la Frontera, Cádiz, España, 2015-12-08, DD 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 20:56, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa de los Dragones, Ceuta, España, 2015-12-10, DD 52.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 20:52, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cuevas de Hércules, Cabo Espartel, Marruecos, 2015-12-11, DD 13-15 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 14:47, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 29 February 2016 (UTC)