User talk:Jarekt/2024

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

QuickStatements in Template:Information

Hi Jarekt. I was wondering if you could explain a little bit how, where and why the QuickStatement metadata as generated by/in Template:Information is being used. QuickStatements use display:none'd information but as external systems do not that display:none into account, it ends up in Google and other systems. It also pollutes the scraped data that is used for things like MediaViewer. So if I have a better understanding of it, then I hope that I can suggest some improvements. —TheDJ (talkcontribs) 11:09, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

@TheDJ: The system of QuickStatements tags is managed by Module:TagQS, and the Module:Information is not creating or reading them (at the moment). Those tags are used mostly to pass information from I18n templates used by {{Artwork}} or {{Book}}. Lets pick an example: File:'Courtesan Playing the Samisen' by Isoda Koryusai, c. 1785.jpg. It has {{Artwork}} template with bunch of smaller templates:
Each one of those templates provide internationalized wikitext displayed in a given field, each one of them also generates QS tags that provide the same data in language independent way. The encoding is very close of what a QuickStatement would be to add the same data to Wikidata. So for example, this file's Creator templates adds <div style="display: none;">artist QS:P170,Q3155497</div> to wikitext, which is picked up by Module:Artwork. In case given object does not have Wikidata item or existing item does not have creator (P170) property than Module:Artwork can provide one click way to create new Wikidata item or add properties to the existing one. You can test it by clicking icon. So if {{Information}} template calls {{Other date}} or {{Creator}} than there might be some QS tags floating in the Wikicode, but {{Information}} template does not look for them. The same templates in infoboxes supported by Module:Artwork and Module:Creator modules, might be used to add metadata to Wikidata. Hope that explains things a bit. Let me know is some parts are not clear. --Jarekt (talk) 01:40, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Commons talk:Photo challenge/2023 - December - Fossil fuel

Hello Jarekt, please make soon some decision on the matter - or cancel this challenge : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons_talk:Photo_challenge/2023_-_December_-_Fossil_fuel ...best regards & a very happy new Year ! Gordito1869 (talk) 12:05, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-02

MediaWiki message delivery 01:17, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-03

MediaWiki message delivery 00:10, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-04

MediaWiki message delivery 01:01, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Request

Hi Jarek, I have a great request: could you please delete this pic? Profesor Maćkiewicz thinks is not too good and will provide us with a a better one. Thank you! Boston9 (talk) 06:51, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done --Jarekt (talk) 12:51, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Thanks Jarek! Boston9 (talk) 15:29, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Module Tincture

Hi,
I restored previous version on Module:Tincture, as there were errors displayed (instead of tinctures) on all CoA pictures using the template…
Thank you,--Kontributor 2K (talk) 11:06, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Kontributor 2K, Thank you for fixing that. I corrected my correction and redeployed. It looks like this time I got it right. --Jarekt (talk) 01:07, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for fixing this,
On the other hand, do you know if someone intends to go on working on the heraldry modules that Sarang has developped ?
--Kontributor 2K (talk) 16:01, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Kontributor 2K, I dont know of any plans. I am quite unfamiliar with heraldry and needs of supporting software. In this case I was just chipping away at files with Lua errors on Category:Pages with script errors. If you know of anything that needs to be fixed I can look at it. --Jarekt (talk) 01:11, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Well, everything works fine, although there would be details to fix; also, adding new users to the IgenCoa users table (table of CoA drawers) is currently not needed (new users don't come there so often).
The distab function was fixed, which is great.
--Kontributor 2K (talk) 10:51, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi Jarekt,
I found an issue, for a specifc user's files… (that could occur with some other's, although I didn't notice others yet).
For an example, this file uses the template that shows SVG information with details about software and user.
If french is used, as well as a few other languagues (català, at least), it shows correct information : 'Ce blason a été créé avec Inkscape par xxx', but if english is choosen, as well as many other languages, it shows : 'This coat of arms was created with Inkscape…important by xxx' - '…important' shouldn't be there.
I couldn't find where to solve this, do you think you'd have time to check this…?
--Kontributor 2K (talk) 20:31, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Kontributor 2K, I am so confused by {{COAInformation}} template. I finally figured out that the "image" parameter is responsible somehow for the field in question, but how does {{#invoke:IgenCoa|main|Yr}} encodes for the information in this row? It seems like "Yr" encodes info that SVG correct, that it shows COA, that it was created by user:Yricordel, that it was created in Inkscape, and that it was created as part of fr:Projet:Blasons. That is 5 separate facts encoded in 2 letters. How would the code differ if Yricordel used a different tool that day, or did this one on behalf of a different project? Or if it was User:Steifer for pl:Wikiprojekt:Herby project, as is the case for File:POL COA Awstacz.svg. I can not find in the template documentation how that is done. Also "important by Yricordel" seems like a bad translation maybe "imported by Yricordel"? As "important" is not a verb. So how would information with and without "important" be encoded? I was trying to experiment with {{#invoke:IgenCoa|main|Yr}}, but so far did not find how to display the content in a different language. Most templates on Commons use "|lang=xx" parameter, but it does not seem to work. Sorry about the avalanche of questions, but I am bouncing between documentation of several templates and not finding much. Source code is also not very readable full of 1 or 2 letter variable names that do not mean much to me. --Jarekt (talk) 01:06, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for looking,
Changing the tool for Yricordel from Inkscape to TextEditor is done by adding tool~T = | image=Yr/tool~T.
I found a possible lead in here where the first example stands for stands for : "SVG file created with Inkscape-Important"…
Actually, "Important" links to Help:Inskape#Inkscape SVG vs. Plain SVG, where this section (at Handling Inkscape SVG) gives more info…
Going further is currently beyond my knowledge, maybe i'm already far beyond
--Kontributor 2K (talk) 12:09, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-05

MediaWiki message delivery 19:28, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

pl.wiki P8189

Hello Jarekt,

Can you help with this. Thanks in advance. -- Geagea (talk) 11:37, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi, Jarekt, the CC0 and FAL templates inside it cannot be rendered since your update. Here is an example. Can you fix this issue? Thanks. 0x0a (talk) 07:21, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Template Self

Hi Jarekt,

Hope you are doing well.

There is something bad (exemple [20]) with that template since the change you did [21]. I don't know what exactly.

Regards, --Benoît (d) 09:38, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Many pages needs to be fixed, such as this one. GZWDer (talk) 11:34, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

@0x0a, Benoît Prieur, and GZWDer: , Thanks for reporting this. I still have no idea what is causing this issue, but I deployed a change that seems to fix the issue. All the reported files seem to be fine after purging. --Jarekt (talk) 13:24, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Broken again in File:Cardamom buns.jpg.--GZWDer (talk) 13:07, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
@RP88: : Please check whether there are files broken here. GZWDer (talk) 13:35, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
@0x0a, Benoît Prieur, GZWDer, and RP88: , I looked at File:Cardamom buns.jpg and here, and all files seem be be fine after a purge or null edit. --Jarekt (talk) 14:45, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-06

MediaWiki message delivery 19:20, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Attributed to logic

Hi Jarek, I noticed on File:Crucifixión, atribuida a Ambrosius Benson (Museo Arqueológico Provincial de Ourense).jpg when trying to use the QuickStatements link, it still uses the old way with the (now deleted) P1773 (P1773) qualifier. Maybe you can change it to the new system? See d:Wikidata:WikiProject_Visual_arts/Item_structure#Use_of_creator_(P170)_in_uncertain_cases. Thank you, Multichill (talk) 16:03, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

@Multichill: Fixed I missed retiring of P1773. I did noticed 2 competing standards and could read both. Now I am only using the new standard. --Jarekt (talk) 22:42, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Edycje mapek, szkiców walk itp

Pytanie amatora:) Czy mapki (szkice) walk, bitew, potyczek publikowane w polskich publikacjach w latach 1946 - do np 1990 podlegają ochronie autorskiej? Oczywiscie pisze o takich publikacjach, w których nikt nawet nie zająknał się o autorze tychże szkiców. Należałoby uznac że robione były w godzinach pracy przez zespoły historyków pracujących w państwowych instytutach (np im. wandy wasilewskiej), a wydane przez wydawnictwo MON. Pytanie zmierza do tego czy mogę je wstawiać i ewentualnie pod jaką licencją keriM (talk) 22:34, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

@Kerim44: Nie znam żadnej licencji która pozwoliła by panu użyć map i szkiców bitew wydawanych w polskich publikacjach w latach 1946 - 1990. Dla szkiców opublikowanych więcej niż 70 lat temu można użyć {{PD-70-anon-EU}}. Prace historyków pracujących w państwowych instytutach USA można użyć na podstawie licencji {{PD-USgov}}, ale w Polsce brak podobnego prawa. Fotografie bitw wydane w polskich publikacjach w latach 1946 - 1990 można użyć na podstawie {{PD-Poland}}, ale ta licencja jedynie dotyczy fotografii a nie map i szkiców. Dlatego większość dobrej jakości map i szkiców jest tworzona przez wikipedystów na podstawie opublikowanych map. --Jarekt (talk) 03:29, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Dziękuję za wyjaśnienia. Rozumiem, że dozwolony byłby rok 1954 i wcześniej (są szkice Kirchmayera z 1946 ale dość hm słabe). Całkiem przyzwoite zaczynają się od 1958 (mówię o kampanii wrześniowej). Ostatnie Twoje zdanie - hm... ale ciągle za mało, a ja tego nie potrafię (pisze o polskim podwórku). Jeszcze raz dziękuję--keriM (talk) 09:45, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-07

MediaWiki message delivery 05:46, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Technical question

Hi Jarekt, could I ask you a technical question? I wanted to make a small layout change to {{Global maintenance category}}, but it doesn't work. But strangely this edit some times before was working. Have you an idea why? Is this a cache problem and I need just to wait or has it to to with /i18n? Thx a lot already and best Regards --W like wiki good to know 20:41, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

W like wiki, your small layout change is just to make administration or maintenance of Wikimedia Commons bold, and as far as I can tell it is working. The text looks bold to me. --Jarekt (talk) 22:50, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Oh thx Jarek for your fast answer! Yes, it is just to make the link bold, but I see it only on the /i18n subpage bold, not in the parent page, do you   I tried also on an mobile device just to be sure that it has nothing to do with my cache, but still "unbold", hmm.. --W like wiki good to know 23:03, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
W like wiki, the main page does not see Template:Global maintenance category/i18n subpage but Template:Global maintenance category/i18n/en instead, so your change need to propagate there somehow. That might be a question for com:TAs. Translation extension works in a bit misterious way and I often do not understand it. --Jarekt (talk) 23:17, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Oookay, I see! Thank you for the link to com:TA, i will ask there! A flower for you! --W like wiki good to know 23:23, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-08

MediaWiki message delivery 15:34, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-09

MediaWiki message delivery 19:20, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-10

MediaWiki message delivery 19:44, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Just wondering what the story is with File:Gaziantep Zeytin Tarlası IMG 9902.jpeg and why you've tagged it for speedy deletion as {{No license since}}?

Clearly there's an attempt to add a licence, and some automated piece of Lua has broken. It was moved from tr:WP, maybe that did it. Now there's a template call {{Self|GÖBL|cc-a-bp-4.0,3.0,2.5,2.0,1.0}} which is throwing up a Lua error 'Lua error: expandTemplate: template "cc-a-bp-4.0,3.0,2.5,2.0,1.0" does not exist.' That's clearly something broken at our end, not a real licensing issue. And never something that should be deleted without discussion, using the speedy process! Andy Dingley (talk) 02:17, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

Andy Dingley, someone moved a file from some wikipedia, but did not change licenses. I was hoping the uploader would fix it. I guess I could have also tracked down which wikipedia it was and figure names of matching templates here, but it is really uploder's job. Lua error is not a software issue but deliberate attempt to stop Lua code and display error if a license template does not exist. I am currently working on fixing licenses in all the files that have this issue. --Jarekt (talk) 03:00, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
So the answer is to burn the file, without even raising it in our forum for such things, without making any effort to fix a mechanical problem? Andy Dingley (talk) 03:06, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
It is not mechanical problem, since someone uploaded a file with invalid license. The user should be aware that it is a bad upload. I can fix this file but do not want to be doing it for other uploads by the same user, who might be unaware of the issue. --Jarekt (talk) 03:15, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Fair enough, but it should have gone through a DR. As it is, speedy deletion seems to be getting used more and more as "simpler deletion", which is something it's never been intended for. Andy Dingley (talk) 03:45, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-11

MediaWiki message delivery 23:02, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-12

MediaWiki message delivery 17:37, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-13

MediaWiki message delivery 18:53, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-14

MediaWiki message delivery 03:33, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-15

MediaWiki message delivery 23:34, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-16

MediaWiki message delivery 23:26, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Module:No globals/doc has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this module, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Enhancing999 (talk) 22:08, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Please unprotect Module:No globals. The argument "heavily used" does not apply anymore. Taylor 49 (talk) 11:46, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Help!

Please see this notice and my talk page to see that I am suddenly the subject of threat of mass deletion of my photographs of scarecrows, on the spurious grounds that they are sculptures. They are effigies, and do not count as copyrightable artworks. (I have called them artworks on my images files, because it is my camera work which makes them so - otherwise they are just temporary effigies, made any old how, for fun).

This trend is extremely worrying, because there is no Commons policy to clarify this situation. If all scarecrow photographs can now suddenly be deleted due to one person's point of view that they are sculptures, then why are they picking only on my photography, and not on the photography of many thousands of effigies, e.g. Guy Fawkes Night effigies, which have been uploaded here since Commons started?

My photographs were taken in good faith that I was breaking no laws. I had the full knowledge and approval of the festival director, when photographing the Minskip scarecrows for Commons, and would be able to provide written evidence of that, by him, if required. I have not done that yet, as I had not thought that it was necessary.

But I would like to know why they are just picking on my photographs? If this is not a general policy, and all the other thousands of photographs of scarecrows and other effigies are to remain untouched by this person's opinion - then this looks like persecution of only my work, which would be rather strange, to say the least.

It is mostly my photography which is the art in this case. Most of the effigies are not artwork at all. Going to these festivals takes a huge amount of time, money and effort for me, since I have no car, and public transport in the UK is inadequate. It takes me a couple of weeks to edit my photographs to make them into artworks. And now my rights to photograph in a legal manner in the street in the UK are being violated, in my opinion. So please would you kindly have a look at the situation? I understand that it is permitted for me to ask an administrator to have a look. I have also asked administrator Mike Peel, but according to his contributions he is not around at present, so I am asking you as well. Thanks. Storye book (talk) 22:30, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-17

MediaWiki message delivery 20:25, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

File:Julien Bryan - Life - 47205.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 17:27, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 17:30, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

Could I get you to spell "deprecated" correctly? You put "depreciated" (meaning to have lost value; is that a joke of sorts?). There are no "i"s in "deprecated". Thank you, —Uzume (talk) 02:25, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

Uzume, sorry I had no clue what are you talking about until I read "Why is there confusion between depreciated and deprecated?" on stack exchange. I stand corrected. --Jarekt (talk) 02:59, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
@Jarekt: I was not aware there was widespread confusion there. Upon reading that thread, I suppose you could change it to "obsolete", since you "broke" it by turning it into an error. Thank you, —Uzume (talk) 10:48, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Please unprotect Module:No globals. The argument "heavily used" does not apply anymore. Taylor 49 (talk) 21:49, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

Request

Hi Jarek, I have a great request (as always!:)) Could you please delete this low quality pic?. Ms Krystyna Kowalik-Bańczyk provided us with a high quality photo This cropped pic presents her in a most unfavorable way. The original uploader, Niegodzisie, consented to such a move. Thannks! Boston9 (talk) 19:42, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done Taylor 49 (talk) 21:49, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-18

MediaWiki message delivery 03:30, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for your very speedy set up of the voting page for this month's photo contest. I love these contests! Magnolia677 (talk) 18:19, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-19

MediaWiki message delivery 16:41, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

File:Pepita - black custom doll - 43.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adamant1 (talk) 04:53, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Can you check the history of this file? A ton of very weird statement were added by you. Multichill (talk) 20:05, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Multichill, that is very bizarre. The file is being used by Institution:Louvre, but I have no clue how it got connected to those statements. In 2022 I was adding digital representation of (P6243) based on SQL queries and Artwork template's "wikidata" parameters, but I do not see how this happen. Also it seems several other users were adding similar bad statements related to items in Louvre. I checked bunch of other photos on popular institution templates but did not see similar edits. --Jarekt (talk) 16:35, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi! This not my picture! Please, do not reverted my edit. Микола Василечко (talk) 19:03, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Микола Василечко Sorry about it. I and reverting bunch of license removals. If it is not yours than I nominated it for deletion. --Jarekt (talk) 19:05, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
This is the same camera I took pictures at university, but this not my photo. --Микола Василечко (talk) 19:08, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-20

MediaWiki message delivery 23:55, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-21

MediaWiki message delivery 23:01, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-22

MediaWiki message delivery 00:12, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

Template:Minpromtorg.gov.ru/en has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tube of Light (talk) 15:18, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-23

MediaWiki message delivery 22:32, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Reverting

Hello! I'm just wondering why'd you revert my adding of the PD-State of Palestine on official governmental items? RowanJ LP (talk) 15:56, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

RowanJ LP, Per Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#Template:PD-State_of_Palestine discussion I removed information about flag trademarks from {{PD-State of Palestine}} as trademarks are not related to copyrights. Without the part about the flags, {{PD-State of Palestine}} is equivalent to {{PD-anon-70}} and apply to anonymous works or need to apply to "statute, regulation, Knesset protocol or court decisions". Most of the files I reverted were flags and emblems created by Commons users, so none of the conditions of the template apply to them. Also in the current state, I do not think {{PD-State of Palestine}} is valid, see the discussion, so it will likely need to be changed or deleted. In case it is deleted, I don't want those files (with seemingly valid licenses) to get mixed up in the discussion. --Jarekt (talk) 19:43, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
I didn't know that this discussion was currently going on, thank you for bringing this up. RowanJ LP (talk) 12:34, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Category discussion warning

Pages with camera coordinates from SDC has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Enhancing999 (talk) 21:50, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-24

MediaWiki message delivery 20:17, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

Request for advice

Hello, Jarekt. I hope you are doing well. I see that you have done a lot of work on date formats. Could you please advise me on how to correct the month format for Slovene (sl) from 'genitive' to 'nominative' in Category:Bojan Kunaver and File:Kamala Harris 2024 - 32.jpg? I have already tried to edit it in Data:DateI18n.tab but there was no effect. --TadejM (t/p) 10:45, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

TadejM, I will be happy to help. First of all, I noticed that changes to Data:DateI18n.tab do not seem to take immediate effect, so if you change something there you might have to wait a day or two to see if it worked. By the way, I think I see some changes "sl" language in Module:DateI18n/testcases. If it is still not to your liking after some days, please give me some concrete examples of what is {{Date}} giving you now and what do you expect. Or even better add them to Module:DateI18n/testcases. --Jarekt (talk) 12:21, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for the explanation, Jarekt. I am going to test it. --TadejM (t/p) 17:37, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

The change is now visible in Category:Bojan Kunaver but not (yet?) in File:Kamala Harris 2024 - 32.jpg. --TadejM (t/p) 14:01, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
@TadejM I see "22. februar 2024 ob 14:19:31" in File:Kamala Harris 2024 - 32.jpg, which is nominative case. --Jarekt (talk) 02:09, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Great, thanks. Then everything is fine now. --TadejM (t/p) 07:42, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-25

MediaWiki message delivery 23:46, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-26

MediaWiki message delivery 22:29, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

Photo Challenge Results

Hello!

I noticed that you are in charge of (or at least you are used to) publishing the monthly photo challenge results. For the April one, I tried to count myself the votes to publish them myself, as they were not available yet (that's not a reproach). But, because I wasn't sure how to do it, I didn't publish them : I don't want to do any mistakes. Now that they are published (thank you!), I have some questions, because I don't get the same results as you.

  • I get 218 images, what is your 219th? I noticed that a file was deleted, is that it?

Thank you, Wikisquack (talk) 14:20, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Moreover, I get only 95 contributers, not 96. Wikisquack (talk) 20:14, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Wikisquack Sorry I was not around last few days. Please see Commons:Photo_challenge/Maintainers_Manual#Convert_Submitting_page_to_Voting_page to read how the results are tabulated. Basically there is a C# code you run on your computer and it does all the tabulating for you, which is very consistent from challenge to challenge. However if you are getting different results than there might be bugs in the code. --Jarekt (talk) 14:15, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Ok, thanks. I was using my own python code, so maybe there are some differences. I will take a look! Wikisquack (talk) 19:58, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Wikisquack I think it would be great if we had a python code which could run on https://hub-paws.wmcloud.org/ and could either create voting pages or count voting results the way current C# code does. That would allow much wider group of users to help with administration of Photo challenge. --Jarekt (talk) 21:41, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

Hi Jarekt. I hope this finds you well. Please could you help me find the original largest upload picture for this file? Until yesterday it was on en.WP under the same name. Being dated 1953, it had lost its UK copyright, and I tried to transfer it to Commons, but the transfer-to-Commons system refused on the grounds of a hidden something-or-other. So I manually transferred the file to Commons. That manual transfer caused the loss of the file history, the original upload being 2010. Since that 2010 upload to en.WP, bots had reduced the size of the uploaded image. Now that the image is out of copyright, I would like to reinstate the original image size, but I cannot find the original scanned file on my PC. Is there any way for you to find and reinstate that first-uploaded larger version of the file? Apologies for the long explanation. Storye book (talk) 09:15, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Storye book, I found and uploaded larger version at https://i.pinimg.com/originals/3a/5e/48/3a5e480912874cbc8314426caa092021.jpg. An admin on En.wiki should be able to see the original upload on Wikipedia. --Jarekt (talk) 12:02, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Wow! thank you so much. I think its always worthwhile doing stuff for our railway buffs on WP. They are always appreciative of new additions in that subject, and they contribute so much for us, also. So thank you again. Storye book (talk) 16:03, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-27

MediaWiki message delivery 23:56, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Sorry, it took me so long to get back to this topic. I've read your response, and from it, I determine that this is fully scoped to template processing, with no external dependencies by other tools that interact with this generated HTML ? In that case, can we please at least mark it with a class, so that this information can be filtered out by Wikimedia when needed ? Example:

<div class="TagQS" style="display: none;">artist QS:P170,Q3155497</div>

Preferably, the information should be in a data attribute, so that the HTML evaluates to not having any textual contents at all:

<span data-TagQS="artist QS:P170,Q3155497"></span>

Using display:none to hide content is an anti-pattern, because it is only visually hiding it and the information still ends up in search engine descriptions, Wikimedia search and sometimes the Wikimedia Mediaviewer as something like: "1887date QS:P571,+1887-00-00T00:00:00Z/9" which is an issue i'd really like to get rid of. —TheDJ (talkcontribs) 20:58, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

@TheDJ: Thanks for replying, and some good timing as I was just thinking about changing the the format of those tags per request from User:Verdy p at Module talk:TagQS. You are correct that those tags do not interact with other tools (that I know of). They are created by lua modules using Module:TagQS and possibly some templates and are read by other lua modules. I like your suggestion of <span data-TagQS="artist QS:P170,Q3155497"></span> or maybe <span data-TagQS="artist QS:P170,Q3155497"/>. Verdy_p suggestion was almost the same. I will start working on this. --Jarekt (talk) 22:27, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
I suggested using "bdi" instead of "span" to avoid any inclusion problems (with a demo). verdy_p (talk) 04:42, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
OK, I will use "bdi". --Jarekt (talk) 13:00, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

Template:Own or another

Hi Jarekt,
Some template related to {{Own}} have been modified, the result is now that the label Own work appears in the {{COAInformation}} and in the {{Information}}, at least, after the {{Attribs}} and on the same line, whereas it was on the line above without the need for a <br>,
In both examples, in the code the {{Own}} precedes the {{Attribs}}, and should be on the line above (as it was this morning CET):
Example 1
Example 2
Do you think you could help in solving this ?
I did not find which module has been altered…
--Kontributor 2K (talk) 13:53, 06 July 2024 (UTC)

Edit : If one replaces {{Attribs with {{AttribSVG, it displays fine.
--Kontributor 2K (talk) 14:01, 06 July 2024 (UTC)
Kontributor 2K That is odd, Example 2 still does not look right to me. I can look into it. --Jarekt (talk) 14:29, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Example 2 modified, displays ok with AttribSVG,
Kontributor 2K (talk) 14:30, 06 July 2024 (UTC)
Jarekt, I give up, as none of the templates used by Attribs have been modified today (unless I missed one), except the TemplateBox which is unrelated here…
Kontributor 2K (talk) 15:16, 06 July 2024 (UTC)
@Verdy p: would your recent changes to Module:Iteration could have caused different behavior of {{Attribs}} template? --Jarekt (talk) 19:59, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
I have not changed these two templates or module today. And if it was working this CET morning, I've not been online most of the day, from about 10:00 to 20:30 CEST. verdy_p (talk) 20:02, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
@Verdy p: I was thinking that maybe those changes took some days to get noticed. --Jarekt (talk) 20:06, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
And anyway I still don't see any problem of rendering. The last change I made to Iterations module is completely unrelated, and was a couple of days ago with an option for generating category links in list of characters (for now only used in two "small" lists of CJK compatibility characters, which are being completed, this is purely optional, and without this option explicitly passed nothing changed), in a function not used by the examples above and never in any file description page or information box. verdy_p (talk) 20:08, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Hi,
I went to see again the file Example 2, it happens that actually the problem also appears with the {{AttribSVG}}.
As the template text is longer, one has to enlarge the browser's window to see the issue, which I hadn't noticed earlier
--Kontributor 2K (talk) 14:55, 08 July 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-28

MediaWiki message delivery 21:28, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Voting: Photo challenge/2024 - June - Mushrooms/Voting

Hello there Jarekt,

In previous editions of the Photo challenge, it has happened that entries have inexplicably disappeared from the competition before the voting. Now it has happened again! I'm not so much interested in knowing the reason why my two entries in round: Commons:Photo challenge/2024 - June - Mushrooms/Voting have disappeared, as that they will be up for voting in this edition of the contest. For example. File:Tropic fungus.jpg has been excluded for some reason? I photographed the mushroom on 27 April 2015 while visiting Taman Negara National Park on my trip to Malaysia that year.


Sincerely

Björn Söderlund — Preceding unsigned comment added by Björn Söderlund, Sw3dPix (talk • contribs) 08:27, 7 July 2024 (UTC) Björn Söderlund, Sw3dPix


Tropic fungus Björn Söderlund (talk) 08:21, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

Björn Söderlund I definitely did something wrong while creating the voting page. I apologize for it. I rerun the codes generating those pages and merged the results, and it seems quite a few entries were affected. Sorry about it. I will check the other voting page. --Jarekt (talk) 19:08, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Oh there they are, thanks!
I discovered the error quite early, no harm done.
Have a good day,
Björn Söderlund Björn Söderlund (talk) 23:15, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

Unverständlicher Hinweis zur Lizensierung mit Verwendung eines Freigabe Tickets...

Hallo, warum ist das nur so umständlich????

Ich habe die Aufgabe übernommen, Bilder aus dem Stadtarchiv in Wikipedia Commons hochzuladen. Dazu ist ein Ticket erforderlich. Das Team vom Stadtarchiv hat heute endlich die Entscheidung getroffen, das man die Bilder unter cc by sa 4 freigibt. Ich habe das an Herrn Neumann vom Support-Team geschickt und erhielt diese Antwort: '''Guten Tag Manfred Beck, die geben Sie den Link auf das Bild an, für das diese Freigabe gilt. Mit freundlichen Grüßen Alfred Neumann Wikimedia-Support-Team''' - ich verstehe nur Bahnhof.

Ich habe die Dateien vorliegen - es sind nicht "meine Dateien" ich würde an statt meines Nutzernamens (Stadtarchiv ...) eintragen. Alle Metadaten hinzu ... und wie funktioniert es mit der Angabe der Ticket-Nummer. Es gibt ein Template (Vorlage:PermissionTicket/de) ich habe gleich zum Beginn des Schriftwechsels eine Ticketnummer Ticket#2024............ von Hern Neumann erhalten, also kann ICH das Template selbst in die Dateibeschreibung einfügen oder bin ich dafür nicht befugt? Habe kein Beispiel oder Youtube Tutorial gefunden ... Bevor es schief geht und man meinen Account sperrt frage ich lieber. Viele Grüße EACC80 (talk) 18:56, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

EACC80, It is great that Stadtarchiv released the images under cc by sa 4, but how do you know about it? If they posted it on their website than you probably do not need VRTS ticket (although it still might be better), but if it was not published then they should send the permission to VRTS. How many files are covered by the permission? If only some than you can upload them and send the list to Herrn Neumann, but if couple thousand than it might be easier to create a license template, like for example Template:Walters Art Museum license. Sorry for not being able to reply in German. --Jarekt (talk) 02:32, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Support needed?

Hello Jarekt, I was wondering if you might need some help with the monthly photo challenge. I am not a programmer but able to check things by hand. Is there anything I can do for you? August Geyler (talk) 16:11, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

August Geyler Thanks for the offer. There is not much of check things by hand, but there are bunch of steps which can be split among multiple users. Most of them are outlined in Commons:Photo challenge/Maintainers Manual. Many tasks require running a precompiled code on your machine and fixing submitting or voting pages, another task is creating new challenge pages. --Jarekt (talk) 02:50, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-29

MediaWiki message delivery 01:28, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

A way to find redirects?

Hi Jarekt, File:15th-century unknown painters - St Ursula Announces to her Father her Departure on a Pilgrimage to Rome - WGA23745.jpg contains some statements that are redirects. Do you have an idea how to flag these with a tracker category? I could set up a bot to fix redirects every once in a while. Multichill (talk) 19:31, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Multichill, Module:Artwork tests for redirects and adds Category:Artworks with structured data with redirected digital representation of property and Category:Artworks with redirected Wikidata link category. Those categories take a lot of work to clear, as I did not come up with a fast way to do it. If you have some ideas, on fixing them by the bot it would be very helpful. However those categories do not apply to files like File:15th-century unknown painters - St Ursula Announces to her Father her Departure on a Pilgrimage to Rome - WGA23745.jpg where I already fixed "wikidata" field and digital representation of (P6243) but missed other fields in the SDC. The issue of redirects should be handled in some automatic way by the database, an issue I raised at phabricator:T237899. At some point I was also toying with extending this sdc query to include other properties or more files, but the sparql query times out easily. One could probably write some Lua code to test all SDC links in a given file and than sneakily add it to some often used template, but that would be putting a lot of strain on the servers (I would imagine). So I have a lot of ideas but none are easy-solutions. --Jarekt (talk) 02:22, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Ok, so for finding them I can use some of the tracker categories.
On Toolforge I also have access to the Wikidata redirects dump and the entities dump. I wrote a bot to remove duplicate claims and that works on the full dump. I could probably do something similar for the redirects.
So one way or another, we find redirects. The bot should probably check if the redirect is older than say 30 days before performing the replacement. I'll see if I can write something. Multichill (talk) 10:01, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Multichill, Tracker categories are only for digital representation of (P6243) / main subject (P921) and "wikidata" of Artwork templates, but redirects are probably more common in depicts (P180) and other SDC properties, and there is no tracking categories for those. Wikidata has a bot fixing redirects, I wonder if its code is published. --Jarekt (talk) 12:54, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
AFAIK that's a closed source bot running on some private server. Extremely unsustainable, but nobody cares too much about it. I'll see if I can write something. Multichill (talk) 15:38, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

Wikimania?

Hi Jarek, coming to Wikimania this year? Multichill (talk) 11:33, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

Multichill, I was planning to come, but I got invited to present on another conference devoted to Witkacy (Polish painter and playwright) about my pl:Lista dzieł malarskich Stanisława Ignacego Witkiewicza article and decided to fly to Poland for that one instead of Wikimania. I am planning to attend virtually, but that is not the same. --Jarekt (talk) 12:44, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
That's a shame, but flying twice seems a bit too much. The whole virtual/hybrid conference thing doesn't really work for me. Multichill (talk) 15:42, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-30

MediaWiki message delivery 00:01, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-31

MediaWiki message delivery 23:07, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

Topic relevant to the {{Artwork}} template - would appreciate your opinion!

Hello @Jarekt, I hope all is well. Sad to read above that you are not attending Wikimania but I hope you have a great time at the other conference!

I have posted a topic relevant to SDC updates to the {{Artwork}} template here. It aims to discuss an agreed data model for those cases where the artwork does not (yet) have a Wikidata item. This occurs very frequently and it would be absolutely awesome if we can 1) come to an agreement on how to model this with SDC and 2) if you could find some time to support that agreed model in the template. So I am very curious to hear your opinion. I suggest we continue the discussion on the talk page over there? All my best, Spinster (talk) 08:05, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-32

MediaWiki message delivery 20:40, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi Jarekt, your edit didn't work out as expected. 0x0a (talk) 11:05, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

0x0a, thanks for letting me know. I did some experiments and found out that unlike templates parser function names have to use lower case spelling, so that was the issue with that edit. "#dir" instead of "#Dir". --Jarekt (talk) 12:29, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

How can I upload photos

When I uphold my own picture which take by me. Are deleted and block my username. 2400:1A00:BD20:ECFF:A063:5857:99AE:29BB 13:36, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

Help with a template

Hello @Jarekt. The templates on Commons are a bit complicated; therefore I decided to write to you for some help. Basically, on May 27, 2019, a law on state property was enacted, which declared works of certain artist and 11 films public domain in Azerbaijan [173]. I wanted to create a template as {{SP-Azerbaijan}} (SP for state property; a term used for public domain), but saw there were many subpages and thought I'd screw it up. Could you help to create it? A {{{1|}}} and {{{2|}}} would be cool. Here's the text:

{{SP-Azerbaijan|2019|author}} → By the decision of the Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Azerbaijan dated May 7, 2019, the works of this author were declared a state property.

{{SP-Azerbaijan|2019|film}} → By the decision of the Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Azerbaijan dated May 7, 2019, this film were declared a state property.

Thank you! Toghrul R (talk) 16:04, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

Toghrul R, Most Public domain templates on commons Start with "PD" so maybe we can name it {{DP-SP-Azerbaijan}} or {{DP-Azerbaijan}}? Also it is easier to use PD template if it does not have parameters so that we do not have to deal with the cases where they are missing or wrong, or at least decide on behavior of the template when that happens. So maybe {{DP-SP-Azerbaijan-2019}} so we can add another template in case there is another law change. Another potential issue is works of multiple authors when one uses this template or works where someone combines a screen shot from SP movie with other content. In such a case a better design would be
  • {{DP-SP-Azerbaijan-2019|author|Q3182477}} → By the decision of the Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Azerbaijan dated May 7, 2019, the works of John Smith were declared a state property.
  • {{DP-SP-Azerbaijan-2019|film|Q189505}} → By the decision of the Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Azerbaijan dated May 7, 2019, film Jaws was declared a state property.
  • {{DP-SP-Azerbaijan-2019|author}} → By the decision of the Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Azerbaijan dated May 7, 2019, the works of this author were declared a state property.
  • {{DP-SP-Azerbaijan-2019|film}} → By the decision of the Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Azerbaijan dated May 7, 2019, this film was declared a state property.
  • {{DP-SP-Azerbaijan-2019}}, {{DP-SP-Azerbaijan-2019|hello}} → By the decision of the Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Azerbaijan dated May 7, 2019, this work was declared a state property.
How does this sound? --Jarekt (talk) 13:41, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
@Jarekt thank you for the reply! Yes, creating a separate template for the 2019 version and having the naming convention are good ideas. It's been 5 years since the law adopted, so if a new one rolls out, we might simply create another. Toghrul R (talk) 16:52, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Toghrul R, I Created preliminary version of {{DP-SP-Azerbaijan-2019}}.
Is there a list of Wikidata IDs (like d:Q3101199 for Qatran Tabrizi) for 35 authors whose works were listed. Also can you point me to some explanation of the concept of "state property" and why Azerbaijan's state property is equivalent to Public Domain, or allowed on Commons. --Jarekt (talk) 20:10, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-33

MediaWiki message delivery 23:18, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

Missing Information

What's your current take on this: Commons:Bots/Work_requests#Media_missing_infobox_template. I noticed you added a category a few years back. I fixed a few + a bunch of unrelated issues. Enhancing999 (talk) 03:11, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

Igen issue

Hi Jarekt,
I have noticed an issue that appeared 1 or 2 weeks ago:
{{Igen|T|+|s=c|S*|gf}} is used to define a SVG Coat-of-arms (text-editor-created) without specifying the author, i.e. it's not meant to display a user's name, but since a recent change in a template it adds "by v." string, and now shows "this coat of arms was created with a text editor by v." while it was showing "this coat of arms was created with a text editor" only… (example) (Inkscape userless template ex. here)
Which is odd…
--Kontributor 2K (talk) 07:24, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

Kontributor 2K I am always supper confused by Igen template, so many impenetrable short names and codes, which I am sure save space, but make the template calls in the files and source code of the template rather unreadable to me. I searched but so far did not figured out how string "this coat of arms was created with a text editor by v." is created. What is the recent changes in the template you mentioned? --Jarekt (talk) 18:45, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
The recent change is that it should not display the default-string "by v." and the end of the string "this coat of arms was created with a text editor", like it was before, and like it is on Inkscape-no-user-specified-created files, where it only displays "this coat of arms was created with Inkscape." and not "this coat of arms was created with Inkscape by v."…
Changes have been made recently on Template:Created_with_Text_Editor, which may be the one concerned, and also on Template:Image_generation ("darkmode")…
I'd love to debug by going back step-by-step on each change made, but luckily I'm not allowed to
--Kontributor 2K (talk) 05:31, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Kontributor 2K, I reverted my edit to Template:Created_with_Text_Editor. It is so odd that most of the time calling {{Autotranslate}} and {{#invoke:Autotranslate|Autotranslate}} gives identical results but sometimes it does not. I still could not create test case where the two differ, so it is a mystery why. Thanks for pointing it out. --Jarekt (talk) 13:42, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Thank you,
It's indeed fine on example file,
--Kontributor 2K (talk) 13:48, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-34

MediaWiki message delivery 00:49, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Photos of Dilaver Najafov

Hi Jarekt,

I remember that you uploaded the photo from the page of National Paralympic Committee of Azerbaijan Republic under unique ticket number[179]. Is it possible to do the same thing for the photos of photographer Dilaver Najafov?

I have contacted with him and he agreed to upload his photos from his facebook, instagram etc. accounts under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license. He have sent the required OTRS mail to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, where he gave url links to his accounts with his photos, and got ticket number 2024082610003915.

Is it possible to get unique ticket number for him and I start to upload his photos?

Many thanks, Interfase (talk) 07:40, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Interfase I think you are on a right track. The only issue is that I lost my access to VRTS system and I am no longer able to help. I would go to Commons:Volunteer Response Team/Noticeboard and ask there. Best luck --Jarekt (talk) 13:18, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-35

MediaWiki message delivery 20:28, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Re-evaluation

Please re-evalute this case: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by HansEST. EXIF-data says that author is JOOSEP KAPSTA, and uploader name is different Estopedist1 (talk) 12:43, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

also pinging @Kruusamägi per comment at User_talk:HansEST Estopedist1 (talk) 12:45, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Estopedist1 I agree that the name in exif is different than the both usernames used, but that is no proof of anything. We generally do not require users to state their real name, so we can verify it. Also I personally had cases where I took photographs with someone else's camera and than had hard time cleaning up the EXIF data. So I like to Commons:Assume good faith, until I am presented with facts that contradict this assumption. This did not happen in this case. --Jarekt (talk) 13:48, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
It is evident from a small googling that J. Kapsta deals with photography and lives in Tartu, and there are multiple good reasons to assume that he is a member of that student organization (like for starters: what is depicted). So, even if he is not the uploader, then the uploader is likely someone he knows very well (and the username part seems to indicate that as well). Multiple users have also edited the organization article (and related articles) and they seem to be members of that organization, and images have been uploaded as part of it. Assume good faith is a very reasonable approach here. Kruusamägi (talk) 16:15, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-36

MediaWiki message delivery 01:02, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

Template:PD-US-alien property has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 19:37, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

Phabricator

Hi. Can you look at this task: phab:T373825 Nemoralis (talk) 10:31, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Nemoralis I think it is fixed now. --Jarekt (talk) 02:04, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Interface admin edits

Hi. Would you mind taking a moment for my requests at Category:Commons_protected_edit_requests_for_interface_administrators on 3 summary pages and an exception list? Would be much appreciated.
 ∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 13:07, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Hidden table of contents

Hi. I noticed, Template talk:Information/Archive 5 doesn't display the table of consents while previous 4 archive pages displays it normally. I can find nothing like "NOTOC" tag at the page. Do you have some idea what can block to display the content table? ŠJů (talk) 23:46, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

ŠJů, Since I switched to Vector 2022 skin I do not see tables of contents much, as they are hidden in the bottom left corner. However for Template talk:Information/Archive 5 I do see it the same way as for Template talk:Information/Archive 4. --Jarekt (talk) 01:54, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-37

MediaWiki message delivery 18:48, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

TSE-Dados-Abertos

Hello Jarekt, how are you?

Some days ago you helped with the Template:Agência Brasil and now I'd like to ask you opinion about the Template:TSE-Dados-Abertos: this template is for files from the Brazilian Superior Electoral Court with this main category (with, as of now, 17 655 files) and the subcategories by year and by political party (with one with related deletion requests).

Do you have any idea to organize everything? As of now, with exception of the main cat (that could be turned into a metacat) the files have been manually subcategorized, but it could be better if it was all part of the template. Something like that:

{{TSE-Dados-Abertos|1=(Election year)|2=(political party)}}

or even

{{TSE-Dados-Abertos|1=(Election year)|2=(political party acronym in Brazil)|3=(Wikidata election ID, if any)|4=(Candidate category or WD id, if any)}} (with the possibility of adding the political office and even if he/she was elected). If possible, the Wikidata ID could be used for bots to create new categories and link them to WD (and if there are a category here, the ID could just make a direct link - but the template should allow to move the image to any "Politician by year", if necessary, or the template could do it directly). Related discussion.

Now, some exemples following some types of Brazilian elections:

Municipal:

Mayor File:2020 PAULO SERRA CANDIDATO PREFEITO SP SANTO ANDRE TSE (250000959444).jpg Category:Brazilian municipal elections, 2020 (Santo André)

{{TSE-Dados-Abertos|1=2020|2=PSDB|3=Q97162435|4=Paulo Serra}}

Council person File:2024 BISPO JOAO BATISTA CANDIDATO VEREADOR SP SAO BERNARDO DO CAMPO TSE (250002150899).jpg

Brazilian municipal elections, 2024 (São Bernardo do Campo) (since it is my home city, I have created subcategories for mayor/deputy mayor candidates, something that could be added in the template to streamline even more).

{{TSE-Dados-Abertos|1=2024|2=Republicanos|3=Q124574221|4=João Batista Ramos da Silva}}

Example for categories of gubernatorial/State elections: Category:2022 São Paulo gubernatorial election;

For the Federal district I was unable to find any category here, but I think that it should look something like that: Category:2022 Federal District election;

Presidential: Category:2014 Brazilian presidential election.

I hope that's not too convoluted. I've spent the last several days working with those images (the municipal elections are next month) and @Pfcab: have been uploading a lot (he may have an opinion on the template). You might find odd the numbers in the files: those are the ID numbering the Superior Electoral Court used to organize the files inside each .ZIP file. I wonder if there's any way to add those IDs in the templates and link them either to dadosabertos.tse.jus.br/ (main source) or to divulgacandcontas.tse.jus.br (example, with the biographical data).

Thanks,

Erick Soares3 (talk) Erick Soares3 (talk) 14:23, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-38

MediaWiki message delivery 23:58, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

Hi Jarekt. Please would you kindly delete the first upload on the above filepage? I accidentally uploaded the original image with the identifiable faces of members of the public. The second upload is OK, because I blurred out the faces. Thanks. Storye book (talk) 09:18, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

Storye book, ✓ Done --Jarekt (talk) 15:59, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Thank you. Storye book (talk) 06:15, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-39

MediaWiki message delivery 23:31, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Category discussion warning

Redirects connected to a Wikidata item has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


JopkeB (talk) 03:48, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-40

MediaWiki message delivery 22:15, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Photo of Sen. Grzegorz Fedorowicz

Hi Jarek, could you please delete this pic of Senator Grzegorz Federowicz. It has been pirated. We we have just received it from the Chancellery of the Senate. Thanks! -Boston9 (talk) 09:07, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

@Boston9: , ✓ Done --Jarekt (talk) 02:12, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Thanks! Boston9 (talk) 11:31, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

And also:

Owing to technical limitations or a fault condition, PDF display is currently unreliable. Please upload an alternative format for multi-page doucments like Djvu. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:24, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

ShakespeareFan00, PDF seems to work fine for me. I do not have different versions of "Witkacy" files as they were provided to me as PDF by museum staff. File:"Creating Wikipedia List articles with help of Wikidata" presentation.pdf I might be able to convert to other formats, but so far PDF was quite reliable if you click on the file to use browser's engine to display it. --Jarekt (talk) 03:05, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

Hyperacusis

HI Jarek, thanks for talking with me. I wondered why I could not get https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hyperacusis_patient_wearing_ear_protection.jpg into the hyperacusis article on wikipedia? LoveElectronicLiterature (talk) 15:04, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

@LoveElectronicLiterature: , I added it to en:Hyperacusis#Avoidance_and_hearing_protection. Lets see what happens. --Jarekt (talk) 19:10, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-41

MediaWiki message delivery 23:37, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

I'm 10 months late but do you still need it gone? I don't mind shutting down my bot task.

Also in the future if you need me for something and don't see my respond to on-wiki messages please shoot me an email. I'm most likely going to miss all the talk page messages and pings --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 20:11, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

@Zhuyifei1999: , False alarm. I did retire {{License template tag}} but had to quickly restore it when it broke image upload wizard. --Jarekt (talk) 00:14, 9 October 2024 (UTC)

Hi there, could you please take a look at the edit request I created for the coat of arms of Brazil? I'm contacting you because you authorised the last edit request. Feitidede (talk) 01:04, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

Your expertise

Hi Jarekt. Do you mind chipping in here? {{Delete/layout}} is not properly localized, maybe only as a half-working hack, and I'd like it to make full usage of {{date}}. You're my date expert, and someone who can edit the protected template. Thanks, Ponor (talk) 14:27, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

One last thing: Special:Diff/934628254/934938927 is a set of changes in the sandbox for Module:I18n/complex date that we need for all (or almost all) examples in User_talk:Jarekt/2017#Technical_question to work properly. @MaGa and I thank you very much! Ponor (talk) 17:59, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Ponor, ✓ Done I updated per your suggestion. Thanks. --Jarekt (talk) 01:21, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-42

MediaWiki message delivery 21:16, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

Template issue

Hi, I have this Template:Contact_author_before_editing and in that, at the bottom there is another template for translations. You have made some changes regarding this and right now it doesn't look correct to me. I don't have knowledge for template work so I hope you can look at it, thanks. --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 15:40, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

@Goran tek-en: I think I fixed it. --Jarekt (talk) 13:05, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
@Jarekt Looks great, thanks. --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 13:55, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Category discussion warning

Bust of Woodrow Wilson in Poznań has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


--Presidentman (talk · contribs) 22:18, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-43

MediaWiki message delivery 20:48, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Edit request

Can you do this edit request?, it's really important, and thank you. Adinar0012 (talk) 17:22, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done --Jarekt (talk) 02:07, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

Organ Repertory Wolfram Syré – donation of 2,500 audio recordings

Felix Mendelssohn Bartholdy: Organ Sonata in B-flat major
op. 65 no. 4
(1865)

Hello Jarek, this is still very early stage, but I am already super excited because as things stand at the moment, we are likely going to receive a media donation of over 2,500 (two thousand five hundred!) recordings from the private archive of a retired German organist.

As a test, I have already uploaded seven files and created a project page on German Wikipedia: de:Portal:Orgel/Orgelrepertoire Wolfram Syré

My initial conversations with Mr Syré are going very well and he has already contributed to the discussion at the German-language organ WikiProject.

We will of course need some help uploading all the files in some way or another, even though Mr Syré has already said that he will help by preparing the files, and also with categorising them etcetera. Is this something you could help us with, or is there someone else we should talk to?

Thank you for your help, and for allowing me to share my excitement about this super cool new project! Gnom (talk) 11:22, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

Gnom, I would suggest to do as follows:
  • pick some file name convention - pick something that caries the most info in short(ish) package. It might help to add some unique identifier to each file name for easier tracking and guaranteed uniqueness. Maybe "Wolfram Syré - name of the piece - 4-digit ID"
  • I would upload the files initially with the default {{Information}} infobox and latter change it to more specific one
  • I would associate each recording with Wikidata item for each composition, like Organ Sonatas, Op. 65 (Q7101763). If they are missing than perchaps new Wikidata items should be created. This would be likely the most time consuming.
  • I see we have Template:Musical work infobox, but that template is unable to use Wikidata to pull data from. Maybe we should create something similar to Template:Art Photo With separate sections for "Composition" (pulled from Wikidata) and the "performance" which uses Template:Musical work and could look like:
Performance artist
Wolfram Syré  (1950–)  wikidata:Q97975
 
Wolfram Syré
Alternative names
Wolfram Syre
Description German organist and musicologist
Date of birth 29 November 1950 Edit this at Wikidata
Location of birth Fulda Edit this at Wikidata
Authority file
creator QS:P170,Q97975
Description
English: Recorded with a sample of the 2012 Metzler organ in the Abbey of Santa Maria of Poblet, Spain using a Hauptwerk digital organ.
Performance date 2024
Source Organ Repertory Dr. Wolfram Syré
What do you think? Also can you tell me what unique data you have for each file? --Jarekt (talk) 03:19, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
Hello Jarek, thank you for your kind and quick response!
As a first step, I tried adding the Template:Musical work to the file File:Rakoczy March arrangement Hector Berlioz re-arrangement for organ William Thomas Best.mp3 – is this what you had in mind?
For the files and their naming, we are still not at this point yet, but I will bring it up in my next conversation with Mr Syré.
Thank you again, --Gnom (talk) 09:32, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-44

MediaWiki message delivery 20:52, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

Eswatini Flag

Hello Jarekt, could you take a look at File talk:Flag of Eswatini.svg? I think I would need help to do all that changing around. Feitidede (talk) 15:33, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

Feitidede I was helping in the past and can help again if there are some protected pages that need to be edited, but I do not deal with flags much otherwise. From File talk:Flag of Eswatini.svg I could not tell what needs to be done. --Jarekt (talk) 23:43, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-45

MediaWiki message delivery 20:46, 4 November 2024 (UTC)