User talk:Hockei/Archive 3

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.07.26.-09-Neckar Ilvesheim--Blaue Federlibelle-Weibchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ. --Palauenc05 17:01, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.07.26.-08-Neckar Ilvesheim--Blaue Federlibelle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ. --Palauenc05 17:03, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.07.26.-07-Neckar Feudenheim-Feudenheim--Mittlerer Wegerich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 15:10, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.07.26.-06-Neckar Mannheim-Feudenheim--Mittlerer Wegerich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 12:22, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.07.18.-19-Schwarzbach Woellnau--Kleiner Blaupfeil-Weibchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 13:40, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.07.26.-11-Neckar Ilvesheim--Blaue Federlibelle-Weibchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Kraft 17:18, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.07.26.-10-Neckar Ilvesheim--Blaue Federlibelle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Kraft 17:18, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.07.26.-01-Neckar Mannheim-Feudenheim--Gebaenderte Prachtlibelle-Maennchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:50, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.07.18.-35-Schwarzbach Woellnau--Kleiner Blaupfeil-Weibchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dnalor 01 21:49, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.07.27.-04-Neckar Mannheim-Feudenheim--Sumpf-Ziest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 15:53, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.07.27.-03-Neckar Mannheim-Feudenheim--Sumpf-Ziest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 16:30, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.07.27.-02-Neckar Mannheim-Feudenheim--Sumpf-Ziest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 15:17, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.07.27.-01-Neckar Mannheim-Feudenheim--Sumpf-Ziest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:04, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Monitor settings

Hi there I love lots of your QI images but I noted you still think my QI candidate damselfly is still too dark. On my monitor your recent posts of cormorants and the distant kingfisher seem very over-exposed and I wonder if we have very different brightness settings or something on our computers? I don't want to start declining yours!! Best wishes --Charles (talk) 10:00, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

• Hi Charles, I think you mean Red-eyed_damselfly_(Erythromma_najas)_male.jpg? Maybe it's the monitor setting. My picture is not overexposed. You can download it and check with a software. I didn't decline your picture because it's fixable. The sharpness is good for me. You can send me your email address so that I can send you a test version I made from your first version of this damselfly. Then you can compare or use it how you want. Have a nice sunday. --Hockei (talk) 10:09, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.07.27.-07-Neckar Mannheim-Seckenheim--Eisvogel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. At the first glance, I didn´t know really what it is, but after three reviews this blue Hotpixel convinced me ;-) --Hubertl 09:17, 8 March 2015 (UTC)  Comment I really was not sure what you think about this picture. I almost threw it away but then I decided to keep one of them. The distance to the bird was about or more than 100 m across the Neckar to the other shore. Thank you. ;-) --Hockei 09:46, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.07.27.-06-Neckar Mannheim-Feudenheim--Kormorane.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:46, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.03.08.-05-Mannheim Vogelstang--Kleines Schneegloeckchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:38, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.03.08.-03-Mannheim Vogelstang--Kleines Schneegloeckchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 14:37, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.03.08.-01-Mannheim Vogelstang--Kleines Schneegloeckchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 14:36, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.03.08.-06-Mannheim Vogelstang--Kleines Schneegloeckchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:21, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.07.31.-07-Vogelstangsee Mannheim--Wasserminze.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 12:58, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.07.31.-06-Vogelstangsee Mannheim--Wasserminze.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:11, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.07.26.-14-Vogelstangsee Mannheim--Blaue Federlibelle-Maennchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:29, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.07.31.-04-Vogelstangsee Mannheim--Grosse Pechlibelle-junges Maennchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:39, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.08.09.-09-Oberkirch--Russischer Baer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:00, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.08.09.-08-Oberkirch--Russischer Baer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Charlesjsharp 21:02, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.03.08.-04-Mannheim Vogelstang--Kleines Schneegloeckchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 19:05, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.03.08.-02-Mannheim Vogelstang--Kleines Schneegloeckchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 19:05, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.08.09.-07-Oberkirch--Russischer Baer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Maybe you should chose only one or two, I'm not sure we need four pictures of the same.--Jebulon 12:35, 17 March 2015 (UTC) You're right the pictures are quite or too similar but not equal. The details and size are a bit different. So I couldn't decide and uploaded all four I have. I'll see the next time. --Hockei 16:27, 17 March 2015 (UTC) Support --Christian Ferrer 05:37, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.08.09.-11-Durbach--Weingut Schloss Staufenberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --DKrieger 18:13, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.08.09.-10-Durbach--Weingut Schloss Staufenberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:59, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.08.24.-03-See Pfingstberg Mannheim-Rheinau--Hauhechel-Blaeuling-Maennchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:31, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.07.31.-01-Vogelstangsee Mannheim--Grosse Pechlibelle-Weibchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Had you thought of removing leaf top right? --Charlesjsharp 21:17, 16 March 2015 (UTC) No, I hadn't and I don't want to do it. The nature or environment is like it is. All should be kept real, so my attitude. --Hockei 16:38, 17 March 2015 (UTC) The top right is fine, but could you fix the dust spots? Mattbuck 22:34, 19 March 2015 (UTC)  Question I tried to find out where are still dust spots but I hardly can see more of them. Can you mark the spots before I upload a new version? --Hockei 16:02, 20 March 2015 (UTC) OK for me. --Charlesjsharp 20:37, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.08.24.-06-Mannheim-Rheinau--Grosse Heidelibelle-Weibchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 06:01, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.08.24.-02-See Pfingstberg Mannheim-Rheinau--Wiesen-Platterbse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:44, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.08.09.-06-Oberkirch--Russischer Baer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI 4 me. --Palauenc05 16:59, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.08.24.-05-Mannheim Rheinau--Mauereidechse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Moroder 19:31, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.08.29.-4-Mannheim Vogelstang--Kraeuseljagdspinne-Zoropsis spinimana-Weibchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Like it --Charlesjsharp 21:24, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.08.29.-3-Mannheim Vogelstang--Kraeuseljagdspinne-Zoropsis spinimana-Weibchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 20:26, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.08.29.-2-Mannheim Vogelstang--Kraeuseljagdspinne-Zoropsis spinimana-Weibchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 20:25, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.08.29.-1-Mannheim Vogelstang--Kraeuseljagdspinne-Zoropsis spinimana-Weibchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Now house pet? :) QI --Poco a poco 20:52, 23 March 2015 (UTC) My wife was against it. So I set free this cuddly toy. ;-) --Hockei 21:31, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.07.31.-08-Vogelstangsee Mannheim--Wasserminze.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 07:54, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.07.31.-05-Vogelstangsee Mannheim--Grosse Pechlibelle-Maennchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Right necessary cropping--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 13:41, 22 March 2015 (UTC)  Done Changed crop, but not quite in the way you've suggested. At the top I want to let a bit lead room. --Hockei 19:30, 23 March 2015 (UTC) OK, Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:39, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.08.30.-02-Vogelstangsee Mannheim--Hauhechel-Blaeuling-Maennchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments great image, though I don't like a 'square' crop --Charlesjsharp 21:22, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.08.30.-01-Vogelstangsee Mannheim--Kleiner Sonnenroeschen-Blaeuling.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments great image, though I don't like a 'square' crop --Charlesjsharp 21:22, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.03.08.-07-Mannheim Vogelstang--Krokusse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good composition--Lmbuga 21:52, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.09.19.-01-Kirschgartshaeuser Schlaege Mannheim--Waldbrettspiel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality & beautiful. Probably ssp. tircis. --Zcebeci 19:06, 28 March 2015 (UTC)  Comment Seemingly you're right. I didn't know that there are subspecies till now. --Hockei 11:29, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.03.08.-08-Mannheim Vogelstang--Krokusse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 07:45, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.09.19.-04-Kirschgartshaeuser Schlaege Mannheim--Gemeiner Beinwell.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:29, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.09.19.-03-Kirschgartshaeuser Schlaege Mannheim--Gemeiner Beinwell.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 18:36, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.03.08.-09-Mannheim Vogelstang--Krokusse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:48, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.08.24.-01-See Pfingstberg Mannheim-Rheinau--Wiesen-Platterbse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Some glare spots --Moroder 19:29, 28 March 2015 (UTC) Focal area is rather small - perhaps a crop? Mattbuck 09:20, 29 March 2015 (UTC)  Done New version with tighter crop and cut bright lens flares. --Hockei 11:06, 29 March 2015 (UTC) Ok then. Mattbuck 19:56, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.09.20.-2-Kaefertaler Wald-Mannheim--Nachtigall-Grashuepfer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition and good quality -- Spurzem 12:03, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.09.20.-1-Kaefertaler Wald-Mannheim--Nachtigall-Grashuepfer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Charlesjsharp 14:17, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.03.08.-10-Mannheim Vogelstang--Krokusse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Why not --Billy69150 10:01, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.09.20.-8-Kaefertaler Wald-Mannheim--Gemeine Winterlibelle-Maennchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:49, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.09.19.-02-Kirschgartshaeuser Schlaege Mannheim--Gemeiner Beinwell.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 06:33, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.09.20.-11-Kaefertaler Wald-Mannheim--Wolfspinne-Xerolycosa nemoralis-Weibchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 14:08, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.09.20.-10-Kaefertaler Wald-Mannheim--Wolfspinne-Xerolycosa nemoralis-Weibchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 21:08, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.09.29.-03-Waldeck Nieder-Werbe--Herbst-Mosaikjungfer-Maennchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:17, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.09.29.-06-Waldeck Scheid--Sumpfschrecke-Maennchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 19:27, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.09.30.-02-Edertal am Wildpark Edersee--Kleiner Feuerfalter-Weibchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:35, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.09.30.-01-Edertal am Wildpark Edersee--Kleiner Feuerfalter-Weibchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 08:23, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.09.29.-04-Waldeck Nieder-Werbe--Herbst-Mosaikjungfer-Maennchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ArildV 07:29, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.10.01.-05-Edertal Bringhausen--Edersee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Two blurry birds yet to be cloned out. It would have been better, to use ISO100 for a landscape photography at a sunny day. --Cccefalon 00:59, 29 April 2015 (UTC) Fixed New version. The ISO was automatically chosen. Anyway I hardly had to denoise the picture. The problem at the Edersee was it was always hazy even if the sun was shining. --Hockei 05:25, 29 April 2015 (UTC) Good quality now. I consider automated ISO choice as "devils work". It ruined me a lot of photos in the past. --Cccefalon 06:32, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.10.01.-10-Edertal Bringhausen--Gemeiner Schneeball mit reifen Fruechten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. Flash is a little bit disturbing. --XRay 16:05, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.10.01.-04-Edertal Bringhausen--Edersee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality. --C messier 14:38, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.10.03.-04-Edertal Kleinern--Gemeiner Riesenschirmling.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:00, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.10.03.-03-Edertal Kleinern--Gemeiner Riesenschirmling.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:29, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.10.01.-02-Edertal Bringhausen--Edersee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 20:39, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.10.03.-01-Edertal Kleinern--Gemeiner Riesenschirmling.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 15:57, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.10.01.-03-Edertal Bringhausen--Edersee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:46, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014.10.01.-01-Edertal Bringhausen--Edersee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:36, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.05.08.-04-Kaefertaler Wald-Mannheim--Buntspecht-Weibchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--Famberhorst 16:08, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.05.08.-03-Kaefertaler Wald-Mannheim--Buntspecht-Weibchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI, but brighthness would help --Poco a poco 16:10, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.05.08.-02-Kaefertaler Wald-Mannheim--Buntspecht-Weibchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI, but brighthness would help --Poco a poco 16:10, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.05.08.-01-Kaefertaler Wald-Mannheim--Buntspecht-Weibchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 16:57, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.03.11.-1-Vogelstangsee Mannheim--Mandarinente-Maennchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:10, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.05.08.-06-Kaefertaler Wald-Mannheim--Knolliger Hahnenfuss.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:44, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.05.14.-03-Lampertheim-Sued beim Hollaendergraben--Teichfrosch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:27, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.05.14.-02-Lampertheim-Sued beim Hollaendergraben--Hufeisen-Azurjungfer-Maennchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 17:50, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.05.14.-01-Lampertheim-Sued beim Hollaendergraben--Hufeisen-Azurjungfer-Maennchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:31, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.05.14.-05-Lampertheim-Sued beim Hollaendergraben--Hufeisen-Azurjungfer-Maennchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice macro --Nino Verde 17:37, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.05.14.-05-Lampertheim-Sued beim Hollaendergraben--Hufeisen-Azurjungfer-Maennchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments NIce macro --Nino Verde 17:37, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.05.14.-04-Lampertheim-Sued beim Hollaendergraben--Hufeisen-Azurjungfer-Maennchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments NIce macro --Nino Verde 17:37, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.05.14.-11-Lampertheim-Sued beim Hollaendergraben--Fruehe Adonislibelle-Maennchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Fine! --Palauenc05 19:54, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.05.14.-09-Lampertheim-Sued beim Hollaendergraben--Fruehe Adonislibelle-Maennchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good --Poco a poco 19:35, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.05.14.-12-Lampertheim-Sued beim Hollaendergraben--Fruehe Adonislibelle-Maennchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:42, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.05.14.-06-Lampertheim-Sued beim Hollaendergraben--Hufeisen-Azurjungfer-Maennchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--ArildV 07:39, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.05.14.-13-Lampertheim-Sued beim Hollaendergraben--Hufeisen-Azurjungfer-junges Maennchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Σπάρτακος 20:58, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2014.08.09.-11-Durbach--Weingut Schloss Staufenberg.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2014.08.09.-11-Durbach--Weingut Schloss Staufenberg.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.05.14.-15-Lampertheim-Sued beim Hollaendergraben--Sumpfwald.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 12:12, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.05.14.-14-Lampertheim-Sued beim Hollaendergraben--Sumpfwald.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 12:13, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.05.24.-03-Buchklingen--Fruehe Heidelibelle-Maennchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:15, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.05.24.-01-Buchklingen--Fruehe Heidelibelle-Maennchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:15, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.05.24.-04-Buchklingen--Fruehe Heidelibelle-Maennchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 15:17, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Commons:File renaming - Criterions

If you rename your own uploads, you should use Criterion #1. If you'd like to rename files uploaded by someone else, you should choose a Criterion (reason). Read the table on Commons:File renaming page, please ;-)
Your request in this File:2015.05.24.-09-Buchklingen--Kleines Wiesenvoegelchen.jpg was incorrect - I don't see any adds or violations there....
The proper template is:
{{rename|Kabukicho along Yasukuni Street, Shinjuku, Tokyo, 2011-03-20 (by Peter Stewart).jpg|3|This location is not {{C|Akihabara}}, but {{C|Kabukichō, Tokyo}}. For details, see Note on description.}}
{{rename| ''new name'' | ''the number of the Criterion'' | ''verbal explanation''}}
for example: {{rename|file:Kit left arm guarani15g1mt.png|1|typo}}
Have a nice day :-) Wieralee (talk) 16:50, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

OK, thank you. --Hockei (talk) 16:52, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.05.24.-09-Buchklingen--Kleines Wiesenvoegelchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. The hind wing is slightly obstructed and the eye is not well-depicted, but it is well-illuminated with good resolution and exposure. --Wsiegmund 00:00, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.05.24.-08-Buchklingen--Gemeine Garten-Schwebfliege-Weibchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:04, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.05.24.-07-Buchklingen--Gemeine Garten-Schwebfliege-Weibchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 14:55, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.05.24.-06-Buchklingen--Gemeine Garten-Schwebfliege-Weibchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:13, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.05.24.-02-Buchklingen--Fruehe Heidelibelle-Maennchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:42, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.05.24.-10-Buchklingen--Gamander-Ehrenpreis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality for me. --Cayambe 15:35, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.05.24.-16-Buchklingen--Svenssons Pyramideneule-Raupe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:23, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.05.24.-15-Buchklingen--Svenssons Pyramideneule-Raupe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:12, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Vanessa atalanta

I present to you my apologies for having removed the 3 images. I did remove one of the two that are the same. Maybe you could do it yourself, that would be fine. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:40, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.05.24.-13-Buchklingen--Rot-Klee-Bluete.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 11:11, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.05.24.-12-Buchklingen--Rot-Klee-Bluete.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:08, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.05.24.-14-Buchklingen--Rot-Klee-Bluete.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:14, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.05.24.-17-Buchklingen--Streifenkreuzspinne-Weibchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good AOV. Difficult to get entire spider in focus in this AOV. QI for me. --Jkadavoor 02:27, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.05.24.-19-Buchklingen--Fruehe Heidelibelle-Weibchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:23, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2015.05.24.-15-Buchklingen--Pyramideneule-Raupe.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2015.05.24.-15-Buchklingen--Pyramideneule-Raupe.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.05.24.-18-Buchklingen--Fruehe Heidelibelle-Weibchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 11:39, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Flash macros

Hi Hockei, thanks for your comment at QIC. I checked this and found you too shoot with flash in Av mode. But your shutter speed is 1/60 whereas mine is 1/160. I think the fast exposure is the cause of black bg. My camera takes 1/160 irrespective of what ISO, EV, etc. I choose. I'm unable to solve this puzzle so far. Any clue? Jee 16:36, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi Jkadavoor, I ignore the shutter speed most. Now I took a look. Adjusting the exposure compensation effects more or less shutter speed. I use it, when the picture is overexposed (the camera monitor show that) or underexposed respectively to dark. Maybe another possible way for you is mode "M". But consider, I'm not an expert and I don't know your camera. I hope I could help. --Hockei (talk) 18:19, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the comment. After reading this, it seems I need to play with FEC than EV to get correct exposure. I doubt whether my flash and camera combination support it as I need to connect them through an adapter. (It is an old Sony camera issue.) Then I will switch to mode M and make a try. Thanks for the valuable reviews as they help me to improve. Jee 01:24, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.06.05.-04-Lampertheim-Sued beim Hollaendergraben--Plattbauch-Weibchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Head well in focus. --Jkadavoor 02:29, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.06.05.-03-Lampertheim-Sued beim Hollaendergraben--Plattbauch-Weibchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting angle and smile. --Jkadavoor 02:32, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.06.05.-02-Lampertheim-Sued beim Hollaendergraben--Plattbauch-Weibchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:28, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.05.08.-13-Kaefertaler Wald-Mannheim--Gewuerfelte Tanzfliege-Maennchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 14:22, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.06.06.-03-See Pfingstberg Mannheim-Rheinau--Spitzenfleck-Maennchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 20:37, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.06.06.-01-See Pfingstberg Mannheim-Rheinau--Wollschweber-Hemipenthes morio.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 20:37, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.06.06.-08-See Pfingstberg Mannheim-Rheinau--Grosse Pechlibelle-Maennchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:52, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.06.06.-07-See Pfingstberg Mannheim-Rheinau--Grosse Pechlibelle-Maennchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:52, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.06.06.-06-See Pfingstberg Mannheim-Rheinau--Grosse Pechlibelle-Weibchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:08, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.06.06.-05-See Pfingstberg Mannheim-Rheinau--Grosse Pechlibelle-Weibchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:52, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.06.06.-04-See Pfingstberg Mannheim-Rheinau--Hufeisen-Azurjungfer-Paarungsrad.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:08, 18 July 2015 (UTC)Good quality.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.06.06.-02-See Pfingstberg Mannheim-Rheinau--Wollschweber-Hemipenthes morio.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 12:30, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.06.05.-01-Lampertheim-Sued beim Hollaendergraben--Plattbauch-Weibchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:13, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.06.26.-02-Vogelstangsee Mannheim--Grosse Pechlibelle-Weibchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Atamari 22:53, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.06.26.-01-Vogelstangsee Mannheim--Grosse Pechlibelle-Maennchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 02:08, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.06.26.-04-Mannheim Vogelstang--Veraenderliche Krabbenspinne-Weibchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Crisco 1492 14:24, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.06.26.-06-Mannheim Vogelstang--Braune Krabbenspinne-junges Weibchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:12, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.06.26.-05-Mannheim Vogelstang--Veraenderliche Krabbenspinne-Weibchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Shows an animal in it's natural environment, decent DOF and exposure handling, promoting. --SkywalkerPL 10:12, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.06.26.-03-Mannheim Vogelstang--Veraenderliche Krabbenspinne-Weibchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Shows an animal in it's natural environment, decent DOF and exposure handling, promoting. --SkywalkerPL 10:12, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.07.02.-01-Schwarzbach Doberschuetz--Fruehe Adonislibelle-Maennchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very interesting composition and good quality -- Spurzem 19:15, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.07.02.-04-Schwarzbach Doberschuetz--Wolfspinne-Pardosa lugubris s. str.-Weibchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 14:45, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.07.02.-03-Schwarzbach Doberschuetz--Wolfspinne-Pardosa lugubris s. str.-Weibchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 18:38, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.07.02.-02-Schwarzbach Doberschuetz--Wolfspinne-Pardosa lugubris s. str.-Weibchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 18:38, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Thanks

	котята
	Thanks to the editor of the Hockei. Question: How do I change my status? http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk: Шухрат Саъдиев 04:56, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Read this, section Evaluating images --Hockei (talk) 10:18, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.07.04.-04-Eilenburg Ost--Blaue Federlibelle-Maennchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:17, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.07.04.-03-Eilenburg Ost--Blaue Federlibelle-Maennchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:17, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.07.04.-02-Eilenburg Ost--Blaue Federlibelle-Maennchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:44, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.07.04.-08-Eilenburg Ost--Vogel-Wicke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:40, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Bilder für Natura 2000

Du hast eine E-Mail --Kai.pedia (talk) 19:14, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2014.07.11.-17-Eilenburg Hainichen--Blutrote Heidelibelle-Paarung.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2014.07.11.-17-Eilenburg Hainichen--Blutrote Heidelibelle-Paarung.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.07.04.-06-Eilenburg Ost--Gemeiner Schwefelporling.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:03, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.07.04.-05-Eilenburg Ost--Gemeiner Schwefelporling.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:03, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.07.04.-07-Eilenburg Ost--Vogel-Wicke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:26, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.07.04.-11-Eilenburg Ost--Grosser Blaupfeil-Weibchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:52, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.07.04.-10-Eilenburg Ost--Grosser Blaupfeil-Weibchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:52, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.07.04.-09-Eilenburg Ost--Barbarossa-Fliege-Maennchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI sharpness, but image appears very green.Charlesjsharp 21:43, 17 August 2015 (UTC)  Comment Bright sunlight and green grass, the contrast is kept modestly. Quite natural everything. If you don't like it, then give a vote against it, that we can discuss. --Hockei 10:38, 18 August 2015 (UTC) Support Good quality --Christian Ferrer 18:32, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.07.04.-01-Eilenburg Ost--Blaue Federlibelle-Maennchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments much of the image is not sharp (e.g. eyes) and perhaps has been over-sharpened? Charlesjsharp 21:38, 17 August 2015 (UTC)  Comment When it is so in your eyes, why don't you oppose? --Hockei 10:44, 18 August 2015 (UTC) When the next image of the Cemetery chapel is not good in your eyes, why don't you oppose?! Charlesjsharp 07:34, 19 August 2015 (UTC) Ok for me --Hubertl 04:49, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.07.04.-15-Eilenburg Ost--Grosser Blaupfeil-Weibchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 17:42, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.07.04.-14-Eilenburg Ost--Grosser Blaupfeil-Weibchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:57, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.07.04.-13-Eilenburg Ost--Grosser Blaupfeil-Weibchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:04, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.07.04.-12-Eilenburg Ost--Grosser Blaupfeil-Weibchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:57, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.07.05.-03-Eilenburg Ost--Grosser Blaupfeil-Weibchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 16:50, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.07.05.-02-Eilenburg Ost--Grosser Blaupfeil-Weibchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:03, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.07.05.-04-Eilenburg Ost--Gammaeule.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:14, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.07.07.-02-Mulde Eilenburg--Gruene Flussjungfer-Maennchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:39, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.07.05.-05-Eilenburg Ost--Kleines Wiesenvoegelchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:27, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2014.07.11.-13-Eilenburg Hainichen--Blutrote Heidelibelle-Paarung.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2014.07.11.-13-Eilenburg Hainichen--Blutrote Heidelibelle-Paarung.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.07.04.-16-Eilenburg Ost--Grosser Blaupfeil-Weibchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Head well in focus. --Jkadavoor 03:15, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.07.07.-07-Mulde Eilenburg--Duenen-Sandlaufkaefer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:36, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.07.07.-06-Mulde Eilenburg--Duenen-Sandlaufkaefer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Vengolis 19:02, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.07.07.-04-Mulde Eilenburg--Duenen-Sandlaufkaefer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 17:23, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:36, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.07.05.-01-Eilenburg Ost--Grosser Blaupfeil-Weibchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 04:38, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.07.07.-05-Mulde Eilenburg--Duenen-Sandlaufkaefer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Σπάρτακος 20:46, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.07.07.-10-Mulde Eilenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 03:39, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.07.07.-08-Mulde Eilenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:06, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.07.07.-14-Mulde Eilenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 21:02, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.07.07.-18-Mulde Eilenburg--Bruch-Weide.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support very good.--Jebulon 21:32, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.07.07.-16-Mulde Eilenburg--Bruch-Weide.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support no flaws.--Jebulon 21:32, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.07.07.-09-Mulde Eilenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:31, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.07.07.-19-Mulde Eilenburg--Bruch-Weide.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:14, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.07.07.-20-Mulde Eilenburg--Bruch-Weide.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful and QI for me. But can you reduce the CA? -- Spurzem 22:57, 7 September 2015 (UTC)  Info I haven't seen the CA yet. I'm trying to remove it today or tomorrow. --Hockei 10:16, 9 September 2015 (UTC) Fixed I hope. --Hockei 15:14, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.07.07.-12-Mulde Eilenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me--Isiwal 11:55, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.07.07.-15-Mulde Eilenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:31, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.07.07.-27-Mulde Eilenburg--Gruene Flussjungfer-Maennchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:29, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.07.07.-23-Mulde Eilenburg--Schwarze Heidelibelle-Weibchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:32, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I saw that worm, its nice but quality is low, f/16 is way too much for m 4/3 cameras. f/9 would be better. I never go more than f/8. gruss, --Mile (talk) 19:57, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi too. I disagree. Normally I use F13 then I get the best results. In this case F16 was absolute necessary in order to get enough DOF. Otherwise there was no chance to get the caterpillar sharp at every part. BTW, it's no worm but a butterfly. --Hockei (talk) 13:36, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2014.06.27.-2-Kaefertaler Wald-Mannheim--Rostfarbiger Dickkopffalter-Maennchen.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2014.06.27.-2-Kaefertaler Wald-Mannheim--Rostfarbiger Dickkopffalter-Maennchen.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.07.07.-24-Mulde Eilenburg--Schwarze Heidelibelle-Weibchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 15:48, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.07.10.-02-Zwochau--Sanddorn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 20:49, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.07.10.-01-Zwochau--Sanddorn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:19, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.07.07.-22-Mulde Eilenburg--Bruch-Weide.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:18, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.07.07.-21-Mulde Eilenburg--Bruch-Weide.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:18, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.07.10.-04-Zwochau--Grosser Blaupfeil-Maennchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Villy Fink Isaksen 14:04, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.07.07.-26-Mulde Eilenburg--Gruene Flussjungfer-Maennchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Schönes Bild (der Weißabgleich ist allerdings nicht optimal) --Elrond 19:44, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2013.08.30.-4-Kaefertaler Wald Mannheim-Wolfsmilchschwaermerraupe.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2013.08.30.-4-Kaefertaler Wald Mannheim-Wolfsmilchschwaermerraupe.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.07.10.-06-Zwochau--Gemeine Becherjungfer-Maennchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:49, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.07.10.-05-Zwochau--Gemeine Becherjungfer-Maennchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:50, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.07.10.-03-Zwochau--Sanddorn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK for me. --C messier 09:29, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012.08.11.-16-Viernheimer Heide Viernheim-Kleine Koenigslibelle-Maennchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:17, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.07.11.-03-Mulde Eilenburg--Gemeine Heidelibelle-Maennchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well focused, subject easily visible! --Skyllfully 20:22, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.07.11.-02-Mulde Eilenburg--Gemeine Heidelibelle-Maennchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--Famberhorst 18:16, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012.08.11.-20-Viernheimer Heide Viernheim-Kleine Koenigslibelle-Maennchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 12:34, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012.08.11.-19-Viernheimer Heide Viernheim-Kleine Koenigslibelle-Maennchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 12:35, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.07.11.-05-Mulde Eilenburg--Grosses Ochsenauge-Weibchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:35, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.07.11.-04-Mulde Eilenburg--Gemeine Heidelibelle-Maennchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:35, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015.07.11.-01-Mulde Eilenburg--Gruenaderweissling-Weibchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:09, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2014.07.18.-26-Schwarzbach Woellnau--Kleiner Blaupfeil-Paarungsrad.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2014.07.18.-26-Schwarzbach Woellnau--Kleiner Blaupfeil-Paarungsrad.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012.06.28.-g-21-Dabelow--Warzenbeisser-Weibchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp enough for WI imo. --Cayambe 09:58, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Hallo Hockei, Alles Gute zu deinem vierten Wiki-Geburtstag! Schade, dass dieser Tag mit deinem Rückzug aus QIC zusammenfällt - vielleicht ist es ja reparabel und du überlegst du es dir noch einmal, das wäre schön! Ansonsten alles Gute, Denis Barthel (talk) 08:45, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

• Danke. Das war reiner Zufall. Aber es ist wie es ist, leider. --Hockei (talk) 10:12, 12 October 2015 (UTC)