User talk:Hartmann Linge

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Hartmann Linge!

TUSC token 2fcf1a8f316365a8012a912b7a657f0d

[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Hartmann Linge!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:48, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kleinkastell_Windlücke has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hartmann Linge (talk) 22:18, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ich muss das jetzt mal sagen ...

[edit]

Hallo Hartmann Linge.

Ich muss sagen, ich bin begeistert von Deinen tollen Fotos aus Sukhothai. Besonders die der kleineren, unbekannten Tempel. Klasse! ツ

--hdamm (talk) 08:20, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Heinrich Damm!
Danke sehr, das freut mich. Es wird auch noch Einiges kommen. Wir waren in diesem Winter vom 12.12.-19.12. und vom 26.12.-03.01. in Sukhothai, das heisst, die Festplatte gibt noch etwas her ;-) Aufgrund der teilweise extremen Lichtverhältnisse muss ich allerdings fast alles erst mit Photoshop bearbeiten, weswegen es ein Weilchen dauern wird, bis alles online ist. Und da ich die photogrphische Ausbeute des Winters einigermaßen chronologisch abarbeite, wird es zwischendurch auch noch ein wenig aus Ubon Ratchathani geben ;-)
Beste Grüße, --Hartmann Linge (talk) 09:28, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Da freue ich mich dann aber schon drauf. --hdamm (talk) 09:51, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wat Chedi Si Hon

[edit]

Hallo. Du hast vorhin die Category:Wat Chedi Si Hon angelegt. Heißt der Tempel denn nicht eigentlich Wat Chedi Si Hong (Tempel mit Chedi und vier Räumen)? Grüße --hdamm (talk) 11:26, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Du bist der Fachmann für die Sprache! :-) Ich hatte mich nur nach der Infotafel vor Ort gerichtet... Gruß, --Hartmann Linge (talk) 12:37, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
PS: Ich gehe mal davon aus, dass Du Recht haben wirst, zumal Lonely Planet und Baedecker derselben Meinung sind ;-) Werde das entsprechend ändern. --Hartmann Linge (talk) 12:44, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ich finde es trotzdem immer recht sinnvoll, ein schnelles Foto solcher Info-Tafeln zu machen. Hilft später (bei der heutigen Flut der Digitalfotos) übrigens auch, die Fotos eindeutig zuzuordnen ;-)
--hdamm (talk) 12:48, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hehe! Ich seh' schon vor mir, wie sich die Hausmeister der deutschsprachigen WP jetzt einen Kopf machen, ob die Panoramafreiheit auch in Thailand gilt ;-)
--Hartmann Linge (talk) 12:55, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Unidentified feature (Sukhothai) 01

[edit]

Moin. Die Geo-Koordinaten, die Du bei der o.g. Kategorie angegeben hast: wie genau sind die? Könnte es sich hierbei möglicherweise um Wat Chana Songkhram (Tempel des Sieges über den Krieg) handeln? Der liegt allerdings ein wenig weiter östlich als von Dir angegeben. Meine Karten – siehe: Benutzer:Hdamm/Thailand-Bibliothek – zeigen in der Nähe sonst keinen anderen Tempel an ... --hdamm (talk) 08:47, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Obwohl – nach diesen Fotos muss es wohl doch ein anderer Tempel sein? --hdamm (talk) 10:20, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ist locker 250 m westlich von “Wat Chana Songkhram”, kurz vor der Brücke zur Insel, unmittelbar nördlich des Weges. Bilder zu “Wat Chana Songkhram” lade ich noch hoch, da müsste Einiges auf der Festplatte schlummern...
--Hartmann Linge (talk) 14:52, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Archäologie: Wat Chetuphon

[edit]

Hallo.

Nur mal so zur Information...

Das finde ich ja unheimlich interessant: wenn ich mein Foto von 1986 (Sukhwchetuphon8605b.jpg) mit Deinen vergleiche (z.B. 201312161348a Sukothai, Wat Chetuphon.jpg) sieht man ja den ganz deutlich den Fortschritt, den die Ausgrabungen in Sukhothai in den letzten ~25 Jahren gemacht hat.

--hdamm (talk) 08:52, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Moin, Moin!
Obwohl es wohl damals eindeutig “romantischer” war ;-)
Ja, auf jeden Fall. Es gibt jetzt auch ein großes Besucherinformationszentrum, unmittelbar nördlich von Hor Phra Phuttha Siri Manrawichai; östlich von Wat Mahathat, nördlich von Noen Prasat befindet sich ein kleiner Ess- und Souvenir-Markt usw. usf.
--Hartmann Linge (talk) 11:44, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Unidentified feature (Sukhothai) 02

[edit]

Die Strukturen in der Mitte des kleinen Sees sollen wohl mit zu Wat Traphang Ngoen gehören, wenn ich dieser Seite glauben darf: http://www.su.ac.th/sukhothai/Sukhothai/html_central/sukhothai_eng_about_center_04.html

--hdamm (talk) 10:12, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Könnte wohl sein... Vor Ort gibt es dummerweise keinerlei Beschriftungen.
Ich wollte im nächsten Schritt, was alle nicht klar ausgewiesenen Strukturen betrifft, so verfahren: Wenn meine Zeit mal ausreicht, werde ich in den Berliner Bibliotheken recherchieren, ferner versuchen, in E-Mail-Kontakt mit der Parkverwaltung, dem Besucherzentrum und dem Museum zu treten. Irgendwo müssen doch valide und reputable Informationen zu bekommen sein... Kann aber noch ein Weilchen dauern, bis ich die notwendige Zeit zu solchen Recherchen finde, erst mal muss jetzt der Photoberg abgearbeitet werden. „Schlimmstenfalls“ muss ich das halt kommenden Winter vor Ort recherchieren ;-)
Was die Insel angeht, werde ich sie erst mal als Unterkategorie Wat Traphang Ngoen zuordnen.
--Hartmann Linge (talk) 11:58, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Bei all zu vielem Material muss man manchmal etwas länger suchen ;-) Bei “Wat Traphang Ngoen” - auf dem Festland - befindet sich eine Infotafel die Deine Vermutung und die Aussage der Webseite bestätigt.
--Hartmann Linge (talk) 14:03, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
--hdamm (talk) 14:45, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hor Phra Phuttha Siri Manrawichai

[edit]

Hallo.

Gibt es von diesem Gebäude auch ein Foto in Seitenansicht? Ich finde nämlich, es ist ein schönes Beispiel für die alte Bauweise („Sukhothai-Stil“). Nicht, dass man sich da sicher ist, dass früher wirklich so gebaut wurde. Nur ein(!) weiteres ähnliches Gebäude steht nämlich im Mueang Boran (siehe mein Foto ganz unten in dem Artikel). Es "was reconstructed based on archeological and historical evidence", wie es im Begleitbuch steht.

Noch ne Frage: woher hast Du die Beschreibung, die oben in der Category:Hor Phra Phuttha Siri Manrawichai steht? Im Internet gibts zu diesem Gebäude keinerlei Information.

--hdamm (talk) 09:01, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Moin, Moin!
Erst mal Danke für die neuen Artikelanlagen. Das war es, was ich mittelfristig mit der ganzen Photographiererei bewirken wollte. In einem letzten Schritt könnte man vllt. auch den Hauptartikel ausbauen und auf "lesenswert" oder mehr bringen.
Eine Seitenansicht habe ich nicht, aufgrund des Sonnenstandes und der begrenzten Zugangsmöglichkeiten auf die Nachbargrundstücke war da nix Vernünftiges zu machen. Vielleicht ja im kommenden Winter... ;-)
Die Beschreibung entstand durch eine sinngemäße Übersetzung einer ausführlichen Infotafel vor Ort.
--Hartmann Linge (talk) 12:50, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. Schade wg. dem Foto. Und schade, ich hatte gehofft, es gäbe da etwas Neues auf dem Büchermarkt, was mir entgangen ist ;-)
--hdamm (talk) 18:15, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

[edit]
2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

[edit]
The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Hartmann Linge,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:58, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Urlaubsfotos

[edit]

Hallo Hartmut, ich habe die Löschung Deiner und Michelles privater Urlaubsfotos gemäß Commons:Project_scope#Examples beantragt. Weissbier (talk) 12:22, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ganz wie Euch beliebt. --Hartmann Linge (talk) 10:49, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[[:de:Benutzer:Hartmann Linge|Hartmann Linge]

Du machst das falsch in Ihrem Template-Dateien. Es gibt keine einzige Konsole. Zwiadowca 21 18:31, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Requested deletion of holiday memories as per "out of scope". Yours sincerely, - Takeaway (talk) 12:53, 27 October 2014 (UTC) Takeaway (talk) 12:53, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Requested deletion of holiday memories per COM:EDUSE. Yours sincerely, Takeaway (talk) 13:04, 27 October 2014 (UTC) Takeaway (talk) 13:04, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:201412041227b (Hartmann Linge) Wat Chetuphon.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Takeaway (talk) 02:11, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:201412041229b (Hartmann Linge) Wat Chetuphon.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Takeaway (talk) 02:11, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:201412041231c (Hartmann Linge) Wat Chetuphon.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Takeaway (talk) 02:11, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:201412041222c (Hartmann Linge) Wat Chetuphon.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Takeaway (talk) 02:12, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:201412041222d (Hartmann Linge) Wat Chetuphon.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Takeaway (talk) 02:12, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:201412041206b (Hartmann Linge) Wat Chedi Si Hong -Wihan-.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Takeaway (talk) 02:15, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:201412031517b (Hartmann Linge) Wat Sawankhalam.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Takeaway (talk) 02:17, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Anniversary celebration at Sila Resort has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Takeaway (talk) 02:22, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Massenlöschanträge

[edit]

Ich formuliere das jetzt nur einmal in aller gebotenen Schlichtheit und Kürze: Entweder diese Stalkerei hört auf, oder es gibt von mir künftig nicht einmal mehr Fotos vom Dreck unter meinen Fingernägeln... --Hartmann Linge (talk) 03:19, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Science Competition 2021 in Thailand

[edit]
Logo for Wiki Science Competition เรียน สมาชิกวิกิมีเดีย

เนื่องจากเราเห็นว่าท่านเคยเข้าร่วมการประกวดรูปถ่ายที่จัดขึ้นโดยวิกิมีเดียประเทศไทย เราจึงอยากเชิญชวนท่านเข้าร่วมการประกวดรูปถ่าย Wiki Science Competition 2021 in Thailand ซึ่งจะจัดขึ้นระหว่างวันที่ 15 พฤศจิกายน – 15 ธันวาคม 2564 นี้

มีรูปแบบในการประกวด 7 หัวข้อ คือ บุคคลในวิทยาศาสตร์ รูปจากกล้องจุลทรรศน์ สื่อที่ไม่ใช่รูปถ่าย รูปชุด สัตว์ป่ากับธรรมชาติ ดาราศาสตร์ และหมวดหมู่ทั่วไป

หากท่านมีความสนใจในการเข้าร่วมการประกวด ท่านสามารถไปยังหน้าเว็บเพจ Wiki Science Competition 2021 in Thailand เพื่ออ่านข้อมูลเพิ่มเติมและอัปโหลดไฟล์ของท่านภายในช่วงของการประกวดที่ได้กล่าวไว้

ขอแสดงความนับถือ
ทีมผู้จัด Wiki Science Competition 2021 in Thailand
วิกิมีเดียประเทศไทย

Dear Fellow Wikimedians,

Seeing that you have participated in one or more photo contests organized by Wikimedia Thailand, we would like to invite you to participate in Wiki Science Competition 2021 in Thailand which will be held between 15 November – 15 December 2021.

There are 7 categories in which you can submit: People in Science, Microscopy images, Non-photographic media, Image sets, Wildlife & nature, Astronomy, and General category.

If you are interested in participating, you can visit the web page Wiki Science Competition 2021 in Thailand/en for more information and to upload your files within the period of the contest.

Kind Regards,
The organizing team of Wiki Science Competition 2021 in Thailand
Wikimedia Thailand

Logo for Wikimedia Thailand

--Karto1 (talk) 11:06, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]