User talk:George Chernilevsky/Archive/Archive 2016 2

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sunflower head 2015 G1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sunflower head 2015 G1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Штандарт

Вітаю! Будь ласка, приєднуйтесь до обговорення питання, що воно нас усіх цікавить. З повагою, --Kwasura (talk) 17:57, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Deletion

Please delete this file uploaded by mistake (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Padurea_spanzuratilor_1922.jpg). I chose a wrong destination. It s a file under fair use. Thanks. --Haptokar (talk) 08:24, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Erinaceus roumanicus 2013 G5.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Erinaceus roumanicus 2013 G5.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Kwasura and Latin to Cyrillic renamings

Вiтаю, якщо ваша ласка, подивиться на це i пояснить менi що саме я зробив не так. З повагою, --Kwasura (talk) 03:45, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Komargorod pond 2013 G5.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Komargorod pond 2013 G5.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Diesel locomotive ChME3-5947 in Vinnitsa railway station, Ukraine, 2012.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Locomotive ChME3-5947 2012 G1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Bufo bufo 2015 G3.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bufo bufo 2015 G3.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Horse-drawn sleighs 2012 G1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Horse-drawn sleighs 2012 G1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Lacerta agilis female 2014 G2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lacerta agilis female 2014 G2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Template:Potd/2016-03-08

Would you mind swapping this with Template:Potd/2016-03-09? Just the 8th is w:International Women's Day but Chisholm only passed today. Your call; you were there first. =) Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:58, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi my friend!

Chisholm was certainly a significant politician. However, i prefer flowers for this day. It will be the international greeting for women around the world.

Sincerely, --George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:15, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Perfectly fine! It's not like Chisholm will be delayed very long, after all! =) Adam Cuerden (talk) 18:21, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Lupinus polyphyllus UA 2015 G5.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lupinus polyphyllus UA 2015 G5.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bouquet Ukraine 2005 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:19, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! T-34-76 Sevastopol 2012 G3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:25, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Inkerman Trinity Church 2012 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:32, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Inkerman cave monastery 2012 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:41, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Inkerman cave monastery 2012 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:32, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! T-34-76 Sevastopol 2012 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:04, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! T-34-76 Sevastopol 2012 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:05, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Red Clover 2011 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:59, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Red Clover 2011 G4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:59, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Red Clover 2011 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:10, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Red Clover 2011 G3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:53, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eriphia verrucosa female 2012 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:55, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

My compliments

I leave you my compliments for the fact you put your beautiful images in public domain; it is very generous of you :) thanks

--AmicidelleCoseSemplici (talk) 14:24, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Thank you! --George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:06, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lasiodora parahybana 2016 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. From my city:"Taranto"  :) --Livioandronico2013 21:44, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Заявка на статус автопатрулируемого

Прошу присвоить мне этот статус для облегчения работы на Викискладе. Я занимаюсь выставлением на удаление нелицензионных файлов и разного рода исправлениями. С уважением --Fenikals (talk) 12:00, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Добро. Приятной работы! С уважением, Георгий --George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:13, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Спасибо за повышение--Fenikals (talk) 08:39, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nord Sevastopol 2012 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:51, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pilot boat Sevastopol 2012 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:06, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pilot boat Sevastopol 2012 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:06, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pilot boat Sevastopol 2012 G3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:25, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Progress boat Sevastopol 2012 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 17:06, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Navy in Sevastopol bay 2012 G01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 13:27, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

An image you deleted has been restored

Hello ! Commons:Deletion requests/File:Selvportræt af mig 2012.png shows that you deleted all the images, but it seems this one File:Selvportræt af mig.png has been restored... how do we proceed to delete it again ? Pippobuono (talk) 10:42, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello!

 Done --George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:39, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DR1A-161 diesel trainset 2016 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 14:37, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tulip UA 2016 G01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 16:14, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tulip UA 2016 G02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --SAplants 19:36, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Project 1164 Moskva 2012 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:59, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Project 1164 Moskva 2012 G5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:59, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Project 1164 Moskva 2012 G3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:19, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Project 1135 Ladny 2012 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:49, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Project 1135 Ladny 2012 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:15, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Navy in Sevastopol bay 2012 G02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 10:41, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Project 1164 Moskva 2012 G4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 10:42, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ladnyy (ship, 1980).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 17:09, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:37, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Navy in Sevastopol bay 2012 G03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Yet tilted ccw (see horizon and pse check also the other photos), elsewhere good. --Cccefalon 10:04, 18 April 2016 (UTC)  Done tilt fixed. Thanks for review -- George Chernilevsky 16:16, 18 April 2016 (UTC)  Support Good quality --SkywalkerPL 14:30, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Project 1164 Moskva 2012 G2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Project 1164 Moskva 2012 G2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! T-40A tractor 2016 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Well done. I would have increased the contrast a little bit but that may be a matter of taste. --Code 20:43, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! T-40A tractor 2016 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good focus to main object --Michielverbeek 05:19, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prunus cerasifera 2016 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:08, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paeonia rockii 2016 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:42, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paeonia rockii 2016 G4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:42, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Compliments

Hi, George. I really like this photograph and thought I'd let you know. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:54, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, my friend! -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 04:49, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Police car Vinnytsia 2016 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. Sharpness could be better. --XRay 04:53, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paeonia rockii 2016 G3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:48, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Living Statue 2015 G02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit of shadow on the face, but quite good quality. --Peulle 20:45, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Living Statue 2015 G03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 20:47, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Living Statue 2016 G01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me --Ezarate 16:39, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Living Statue 2016 G02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, although the background is distracting. --Uoaei1 09:45, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ER9E-662 train 2016 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:21, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Forest road Slavne 2016 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 19:50, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chelidonium majus 2016 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 19:50, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Living Statue 2015 G01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very dark areas but beautiful image.--Famberhorst 16:04, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Living Statue 2015 G04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:53, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paeonia Hai Huang 2016 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:53, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paeonia Hai Huang 2016 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 19:39, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paeonia Hai Huang 2016 G3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 01:17, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:44, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vinca minor 2016 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:39, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Locomotive VL80T-1809 2016 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:37, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Locomotive VL80K-545 2016 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 07:08, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ER9M-551 train 2016 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:57, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lupinus polyphyllus UA 2016 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 20:47, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lupinus polyphyllus UA 2016 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 20:47, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Solidago canadensis 2016 G01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:12, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Solidago canadensis 2016 G02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:25, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paeonia Hai Huang 2016 G5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Crisp flower --Daniel Case 05:41, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Paeonia 'Hai Huang' (High Noon) hybrid, flower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:33, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2nd Class S badge USSR later.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:47, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 1st Class S badge USSR later.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI imo --ArildV 08:20, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 3rd Class S badge USSR later.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks good. --Peulle 13:47, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

email

--X-Men Forever (talk) 05:39, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:IttqhNoU6Iw.jpg

Hi, the only page the one image is used on is a userpage, and userpage images of promotional single-purpose accounts are generally deleted as well (coincidentally, this is currently being discussed at the VP). FDMS 4 17:54, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Hello, this image could be deleted after deletion/blanked related page. With best regards, -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:01, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Cleaning up such pages is the job of the local communities – since I don't speak Russian, I can't read their deletion policies. COM:INUSE explicitly states that an otherwise non-educational file does not acquire educational purpose solely because it is in use on a user page, should we really extend the courtesy of hosting userpage images to spammers? FDMS 4 18:31, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

I too don't like spammers, but "uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page of another project is allowed." You can also nominate again for deletion this file. Let another Administrator will review your DR nomination. Very friendly, -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:34, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

AFAIK I shouldn't reopen DRs without new arguments, for this reason I've brought this to the AN instead. Also, since you're not exactly an inexperienced or careless admin, bringing the informally agreed procedure (if any) to the attention of other admins might be a positive side effect. FDMS 4 21:27, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Desenka Railway Halt 2016 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:44, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 3rd Class S badge USSR early.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:37, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Master S badge USSR later.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ah, another one of these. The DoF here could be a little better; you're losing focus towards the bottom, but otherwise quite good quality. --Peulle 17:31, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Forest road Slavne 2016 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:20, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Potato flowers 2016 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:21, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2nd Class S badge USSR early.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:59, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 1st Class S badge USSR early.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:52, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Soviet Army soldier's breast badge "Master Specialist", later.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:51, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 19:12, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Soviet Army soldier's breast badge "First Class Specialist" early.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:51, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Soviet Army soldier's breast badge "First Class Specialist" later.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:52, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Soviet Army soldier's breast badge "Second Class Specialist" early.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:21, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Soviet Army soldier's breast badge "Second Class Specialist" later.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:21, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Soviet Army soldier's breast badge "Third Class Specialist" early.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Soviet Army soldier's breast badge "Third Class Specialist" later.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Locomotive ChS4-196 2016 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:47, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Potato flowers 2016 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:01, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hemerocallis fulva 2016 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful and good quality -- Spurzem 19:22, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! EKr1-001 Tarpan 2016 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 10:18, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! EKr1-001 Tarpan 2016 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Hemerocallis fulva 2016 G1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hemerocallis fulva 2016 G1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DPL1-002 Diesel train 2016 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:48, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yaremche Railway Station 2016 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:10, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Locomotive 2M62-0618 2016 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:48, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Creek to Prut 2016 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:45, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boletus reticulatus 2016 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:04, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edible fungi in basket 2016 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good and useful image. --Peulle 21:11, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peas in pods 2016 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:38, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Creek to Prut 2016 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 07:09, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Verbascum nigrum 2016 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:47, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Levkivtsi Tulchyn 2016 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:09, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Levkivtsi Tulchyn 2016 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:09, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Locomotive ChS4-085 2016 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:41, 3 July 2016 (UTC)  Comment Nice picture, but the composition could be improved with cropping at left and at the base -- Bahnfrend 00:56, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Verbascum nigrum 2016 G3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 10:22, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Вікі любить Землю 2016

Вітання! Чи від мене отримали листа? Буду вдячна за відповідь чи все окей --AnnaKhrobolova (WMUA) (talk) 12:43, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Вітаю! Так, усе добре. Вже приступив до оцінювання.

З повагою, --George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:13, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Verbascum nigrum 2016 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 10:48, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boletus luridus 2016 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aruncus dioicus 2016 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment See note. --C messier 08:40, 10 July 2016 (UTC)  Done CA fixed -- George Chernilevsky 18:28, 10 July 2016 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --C messier 11:25, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the Dormition of the Theotokos Yaremche 2016 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:34, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the Dormition of the Theotokos Yaremche 2016 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:31, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Deletion

Please delete this file File:Noptile de Sanziene 1934.jpg I uploaded in the wrong place. Thanks. --Haptokar (talk) 04:58, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

•  Done. With best regards, --George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:01, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wooden church of the Dormition of the Theotokos in Yaremche, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:25, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Desenka meadow 2016 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:11, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Desenka meadow 2016 G3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:29, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hortiboletus rubellus 2016 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 02:56, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lilium cultivar 2016 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 05:31, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Desenka meadow 2016 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. W.carter 08:50, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

FPC reviewing and archiving

Hi old friend. I hope you're having a good weekend (or had a good one - it's night where you are, and early afternoon here... ). I just have a few quick questions about FPC. The FPC Bot archives pictures that have passed as featured after I review them doesn't it? Do I have to archive failed FPCs by hand? I already hand-archive withdrawn FPCs after adding the reviewed tag. Let me know if you see me mess up anything at FPC. I noticed a little while ago that you were almost the only guy reviewing and archiving at FPC, so I thought I'd try and help out a bit. INeverCry 22:01, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello my friend!

The FPCbot processed all nominations: successful and rejected after confirmed review by a user.

And yes, the bot archives all nomination after consideration into current month log page.

However, the bot has troubles processing set nominations and rejected with FPX candidates.

These are two situations when need manual processing candidates.

Good luck and not only on Commons.

Very friendly, George -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:28, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

I sure could use some good luck right now. I have a doctor visit on Wednesday, and the medication he's given me so far hasn't helped very much. Hopefully he'll find me something better. Take care. INeverCry 20:48, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

I wish you healing, my friend. For personal contact you can send me an e-mail. I will answer.

Sincerely, --George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:10, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

That's good to know. I've had a friend in Moscow for quite a few years now. He's gotten great with his English...and my Russian has stayed terrible. There are some questions about Ukrainian literature I wouldn't mind asking you, mostly regarding Taras Shevchenko, Ivan Franko, and Lesya Ukrainka (and maybe Mikhail Kotsiubinsky if I really get going). I've got a huge library of English literature in retail PDF form in case you're a reader too. We're less than a year apart in age by the way; I was born in March of 1968. INeverCry 06:27, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Desenka meadow 2016 G1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Desenka meadow 2016 G1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Copyright Policy

What is the correct Copyright policy for this. -- Raghith 12:35, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello!

Similar to Creative Commons Share Alike IMO -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:38, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Thank you. -- Raghith 05:53, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

I think our community has rejected that permission due to the vagueness. Some GoI sites has clear CC BY permissions. Jee 06:40, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Category:Tazheran Steppe

Hi George. Can you take a look at this category and see if the parent category is correct, and if it can be added to any other other categories? INeverCry 23:00, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello my friend!

 Done --George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:55, 27 August 2016 (UTC)