User talk:George Chernilevsky/Archive/Archive 2009 2

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lasiodora parahybana 2009 G06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Another QI. Lycaon 14:51, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pogona vitticeps close-up 2009 G3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Again a very good animal picture with sand. Dared to correct your German grammar on description page. --Johannes Robalotoff 17:59, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Vladimir Chersonesos 2008 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slightly distorted at right, but ok for me. --Cayambe 14:05, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eublepharis macularius 2009 G8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good too. Keep 'em coming :-) Lycaon 17:22, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eriphia verrucosa female 2009 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Carcinus aestuarii (Mediterranean green crab).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support OK for me, all criteria met. Lycaon (talk) 09:27, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Lycaon (talk) 09:45, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

VCB

Thanks you very much George, it is much appreciated. Lycaon (talk) 15:32, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xantho poressa 2009 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Iotatau 11:14, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pogona vitticeps close-up 2009 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 19:16, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pogona vitticeps close-up 2009 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 19:19, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lasiodora parahybana 2009 G01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments All of these spider shots have good quality. -- JovanCormac 15:27, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lasiodora parahybana 2009 G03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments All of these spider shots have good quality. -- JovanCormac 15:27, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lasiodora parahybana 2009 G04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments All of these spider shots have good quality. This is the best one IMO. -- JovanCormac 15:27, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lasiodora parahybana 2009 G07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments All of these spider shots have good quality. -- JovanCormac 15:27, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lasiodora parahybana 2009 G09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments All of these spider shots have good quality. -- JovanCormac 15:27, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carcinus aestuarii 2009 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharpness is insufficient in some parts, but overall acceptable for QI. -- H005 18:05, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

QI Barnstar

Thank you, George! It has been a pleasure to contribute to Commons and being evaluated by attentive users like you. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 07:33, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pachygrapsus marmoratus 2009 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Iotatau 21:38, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Your spider pictures

I really like the many detailed pictures of large spiders that you are submitting. Question: I have heard of people who own spiders feeding them live animals, like mice or large insects. Do you do that? If yes, it would be fantastic if you could take a picture of that. A good shot of a tarantula attacking a white mouse would undoubtedly be one of the highlights of our collection, and make Featured Picture for sure. -- JovanCormac 15:43, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

A token of appreciation

For the many interesting pictures you have contributed, and for being a kind user willing to engage in conversation in order to solve an issue, I hereby award you this Barnstar. -- JovanCormac 10:41, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

F-16

Hi, George. Could you please add a description in Russian to this photo. Thanks in advance. Airwolf (talk) 11:15, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

 Done --George Chernilevsky (talk) 11:30, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flexopecten ponticus 2008 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- Darius Bauzys 13:27, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brachypelma auratum run 2009 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good--Korall 15:42, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brachypelma auratum run 2009 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, I like the legs in the air. --Korall 15:42, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brachypelma auratum run 2009 G3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Mbdortmund 13:32, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fomes fomentarius (Tinder fungus).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Oppose Fails criterion #1, Is the most valuable illustration of its kind on Wikimedia Commons. At least File:Fomes fomentarius.jpg and File:Fomes fomentarius 1.jpg are strong competitors. Should be nominated for MVR. -- JovanCormac 15:13, 23 September 2009 (UTC) I change my vote to  Support George has convinced me that the other images are indeed inferior (low resolution, no geocoding). -- JovanCormac 05:14, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 21:44, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Xantho poressa, female.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Oppose "Xantho poressa, female at spawning time" is a description, not a scope. -- JovanCormac 15:04, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment Xantho poressa female NOT in spawning time has view like this crab female, view from bottom. Probable scope is not incorrect --George Chernilevsky (talk) 08:01, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
  • I never claimed it was incorrect - it's far too narrow, though. I'd appreciate if we could get a few more opinions on this. -- JovanCormac 08:42, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Xantho poressa, female at spawning time to 'Xantho poressa, female

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

• Ok, scope changed --George Chernilevsky (talk) 08:49, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
  • Thank you, I change my vote to  Support. Incidentially, what is the difference between females and males of that species? -- JovanCormac 10:04, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 21:46, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Boletus impolitus (Iodine bolete).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Oppose Once again, not a scope but a description. -- JovanCormac 15:08, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Boletus impolitus Iodine bolete in natural environment to ' Boletus impolitus (Iodine bolete)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

--George Chernilevsky (talk) 07:14, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

•  Support Better scope now, fulfills all requirements. -- JovanCormac 08:40, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 21:47, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lasiodora parahybana 2009 G02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality --Mbdortmund 18:19, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brachypelma auratum 2009 G07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good QI. --Cayambe 18:47, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brachypelma auratum 2009 G08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good QI.--Cayambe 18:47, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

90

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tractor T-16 2009 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Original roadworks image with clear subject presentation. --Iotatau 19:36, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lasiodora parahybana 2009 G08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good image. I think the subject looks better in this one. 99of9 06:01, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lasiodora parahybana 2009 G10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Johannes Robalotoff 17:21, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pachygrapsus marmoratus 2009 G3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Gorgeous. --99of9 07:31, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

File:Brachypelma boehmei 2009 G03.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brachypelma boehmei 2009 G03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good.--Mbz1 19:27, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brachypelma boehmei 2009 G05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good.--Mbz1 19:27, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brachypelma boehmei 2009 G08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good.--Mbz1 19:27, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hemerocallis fulva 2009 G3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent. --Cayambe 11:12, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hemerocallis fulva 2009 G4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for me - Darius Bauzys 06:58, 6 October 2009 (UTC)  Comment Thanks! It is my 100-th QI -- George Chernilevsky 07:07, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fomes fomentarius inside 2009 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good image indeed -Herbythyme 15:58, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brachypelma boehmei 2009 G12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This one facing us is the best composed of the three IMO. --99of9 02:43, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

101

Thanks

I was pleasantly surprised to find that my little hedgehog had been nominated and promoted as a QI, thanks :-) :-).

:-)

--Tony Wills (talk) 04:47, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Pachygrapsus marmoratus 2009 G3.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pachygrapsus marmoratus 2009 G3.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 23:03, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Clibanarius erythropus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Meets all six criteria. Walter Siegmund (talk) 04:46, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 10:28, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

VI

Hello, It just needs someone to close them...you, for example? ;oP Yann (talk) 12:49, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Rastaman3000 closed the MVR nominations. Yann (talk) 17:56, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Brachypelma auratum.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Oppose - Cute spider. However, not geocoded. --Rastaman3000 (talk) 17:16, 13 September 2009 (UTC) - Second image is better IMO --Rastaman3000 (talk) 17:56, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
  • Geocode are not relevant. In rules: Exceptions include: studio and other non-place-related shots. It is in description. --George Chernilevsky (talk) 04:51, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Support I follow H005. Lycaon (talk) 17:48, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Support I prefere this shot, because the head is better visible --Cesco77 (talk) 09:18, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Support As above; also shows both pedipalps well. Walter Siegmund (talk) 00:59, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support and thank to all -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:55, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Result: 4 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Rastaman3000 (talk) 17:07, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Fomes fomentarius inside 2009 G1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fomes fomentarius inside 2009 G1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 23:08, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Too soon for poll

Hi George, The vote on the FPC talk page is far too premature, we are still in the discussion phase. In fact I would prefer to reach a consensus and avoid a winners/loosers poll. --Tony Wills (talk) 00:05, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

I should thank you, because your 'voting' scheme has brought about a bit more discussion and ideas than we had before. Thanks :-) --Tony Wills (talk) 12:02, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fomes fomentarius (Tinder fungus), section.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Hmm, difficult. This is an excellent image showing the interior of the fungus, but it leaves one clueless about how it looks from the outside, which is how you usually see it. There are many other images who do so, even an FP (File:Cracked Mushroom.jpg), but then these show only the exterior. -- H005 21:27, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

•  Info Valued image with only the exterior already exist. It is File:Fomes fomentarius 2009 G2.jpg. Please attentive re-read scope - inside -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:12, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment I think a better name of the scope would be cross-section, not inside because I think cross-section describes what the image is about more than inside, but maybe i think too much in mathematical terms. --Korall (talk) 10:50, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Category:Fomes fomentarius (Tinder fungus), inside to Fomes fomentarius (Tinder fungus), inside

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

--George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:50, 13 October 2009 (UTC)  CommentYou didnt change the scope, you hust changed the link from the species page to the species category. --Korall (talk) 17:23, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

•  Comment Hmmm, two scopes for a single fungus seem a bit narrow even for me. I'd rather have a single image showing both interior and exterior, i. e. your cross-section and next to it the exterior view photographed in the same style and quality. Or two separate images of the same quality and style nominated as an image set. -- H005 21:18, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Fomes fomentarius (Tinder fungus), inside to Fomes fomentarius (Tinder fungus), section

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

--George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:55, 14 October 2009 (UTC)  Support I would not prefer two images joined togherther, I prefer the flexibility of separate images. The scope is now good and I think the criteria are met. --Korall (talk) 11:26, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

•  Support - there is already a VI for "exterior". This image shows is the best one showing the "interior" IMO --Rastaman3000 (talk) 17:18, 13 October 2009 (UTC) - somebody removed my vote for an unknown reason. --Rastaman3000 (talk) 18:50, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 20:50, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Flexopecten glaber ponticus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Fulfils all criteria. Lycaon (talk) 18:23, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 12:07, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pachygrapsus marmoratus (Marbled rock crab).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support I think this image is best because it has a non-messy background. Criteria met. --Korall (talk) 10:55, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 12:07, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

11

Picture of the day

I was happy to see you put my Peacock butterfly on the 9th of march. Someone put Usain bolt for the 8th of march. The 8th of march is the international womens day so I think it could be cool to put a woman there instead that day. Is it possible to change? Maybe we could switch so that File:Inde_bondo8658a.jpg is the 8th of march and Usain bolt the 19th of january? --Korall (talk) 12:46, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

Yes, good idea. Please move Usain Bolt another day. File:Inde_bondo8658a.jpg is a good choice. Yann (talk) 00:55, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

I dont know how to do that.--Korall (talk) 16:33, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AS-16 Kickback 2008 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --Mbdortmund 12:49, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Pixels and octets

Hi, Grez!

Please check Your voting in Quality images candidates. 2 million pixels is the size of the image in points. You must be attentive in the future. Thanks!

With best regards, -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:55, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Well, it seems logical now ! Thanks for telling me, Gregory Zeier (talk) 14:50, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Вопрос

Добрый день, как я могу переслать Вам фаил ?

С уважением, Darius Baužys ^{→ talk} 14:33, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clibanarius erythropus 2008 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like this one --Berthold Werner 18:18, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument to Flooded ships 2009 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. -- H005 21:31, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! British 1854-1856 2009 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. -- H005 13:51, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument to Flooded ships 2008 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good & better than the other one. -- H005 21:17, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Greater burdock 2005 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice --Mbdortmund 01:09, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! IS-3 Tank Kiev 2007 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--Mbz1 16:19, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! RSD-10 2009 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Pudelek 15:09, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clibanarius erythropus 2008 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. 99of9 00:10, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clibanarius erythropus 2008 G3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

111

From France

Thank you for your message I would be careful with the syntax, friendly Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:03, 6 November 2009 (UTC)