User talk:Filo gèn'/Archive

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Filo gèn'!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 05:21, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zenaida aurita (partie de la tête) Guadeloupe. jpg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Indrajit Das 12:13, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

J'ai reçu l'avis de suppression. Je pense qu'il faut juste renommer le fichier ainsi : Zenaida aurita (partie de la tête) Guadeloupe. jpg Filo gèn' (talk) 06:26, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zenaida aurita (tourterelle à queue carré) de la Guadeloupe. jpg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Indrajit Das 12:14, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Themightyquill (talk) 12:17, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ces images ont été prise à partir de photographies déjà existante. C'est pour cela que je les aient classées dans le domaine public. Filo gèn' (talk) 06:41, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:971.GUADELOUPE. has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Themightyquill (talk) 21:01, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Végé grimp?.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hiddenhauser (talk) 17:21, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image du jour de Wiki Loves Earth 2017 en France, 4 May 2017

[edit]
Wiki Loves Earth 2017 Votre photo « Natural park.jpg » a été choisie par les bénévoles de Wiki Loves Earth 2017 comme image coup de cœur (ou image du jour) du 4 May 2017.

Cordialement, Pmau (talk) 07:17, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:LONG HORN.jpg

[edit]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:LONG HORN.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:LONG HORN.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Esby (talk) 19:36, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FPC

[edit]

Je vois que vous essayez de créer une nomination au FPC. Pour que cela fonctionne, il faut d'abord créer une page pour la nomination, puis mettre le code dans la liste. Veuillez suivre les instructions sur cette page:

--cart-Talk 11:52, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image coup de cœur de Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 en France, 2 September 2017

[edit]
Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 Votre photo « Corps de Garde du Fort Louis Delgrès.jpg » a été choisie par les bénévoles de Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 comme image coup de cœur (ou image du jour) du 2 September 2017.

Cordialement, -- Marianne Casamance (talk) 05:28, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Participation au concours Wiki Loves Monuments 2017

[edit]

Bonjour et merci pour votre participation à Wiki Loves Monuments.

Cependant, la photographie File:Alexis Léger.jpg ne représente pas un monument historique protégé. Elle a donc malheureusement dû être retirée du concours.

N’hésitez pas à ajouter d’autres clichés, en vérifiant que l'image représente bien un édifice protégé.

Bonne participation, cordialement, VIGNERON (talk) 12:12, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Photos du Marché central de Pointe-à-Pitre soumises à WLM 2017

[edit]

Bonjour et merci pour votre participation à l'édition 2017 de Wiki Loves Monuments.

Cependant, sur les photographies

on ne voit aucun élément d'architecture du monument. J'ai donc dû les retirer du concours.

N’hésitez pas à ajouter d’autres clichés, comme votre série sur le Fort Delgrès qui a retenu l'attention de notre équipe.

Bonne contributions, Jvillafruela (talk) 21:04, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Petit renseignement

[edit]

Bonjour ou bonsoir selon le fuseau horaire.

À propos de l'image Mémorial Delgrès( Fort Louis Delgrès ).jpg En haut à droite de cette image je voudrais retirer la tâche bleu , j'aimerais savoir si vous pouviez faire ceci ou existe t-il un outil pour cela? Ou doit-je posé ma question à un vérificateur d'image. Merci.

Cordialement.

Filo gèn' (talk) 21:25, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,
De manière générale, pour les corrections sur images, nous devons le faire hors commons, puis les rechargées, pour remplacement de la 1ère version. l'accès se fait dans le fichier d'origine, paragraphe « Historique du fichier » - « Importer une nouvelle version de ce fichier ». Donc, vous pouvez le faire directement, depuis chez vous. -- Marianne Casamance (talk) 06:55, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nom de catégories

[edit]

Bonjour Filo gèn', je suis surprise de trouver des catégories avec une "puce" au début du nom (comme Category:• plantae, Category:-Araceae ou encore Category:*Anthurium palmatum). C'est à priori contraire aux conventions de Commons. Est-ce une tentative pour les ranger en dehors de l'ordre alphabétique ? Pour ranger les catégories selon des signes qui les afficheront avant ceux de l'alphabet, il suffit de spécifier une clé de tri comme ceci, dans la nouvelle catégorie. Exemple pour une catégorie Y :

  • [[Category:XXX| ]] (une espace vide), ce qui placera Y dans la catégorie XXX, en haut, avant les signes typo et l'alphabet,)
  • [[Category:XXX|*]], ce qui placera Y dans la catégorie XXX, sous «*», avant l'alphabet. Utilisé pour les catégories "XXX by..." (autre type de tri général que la classification scientifique : lieu, biotope, couleur, qualité, utilité...)
  • [[Category:XXX|?]], ce qui placera Y dans la catégorie XXX, sous «?», avant l'alphabet. Utilisé pour les catégorie "Unidentified....")

Quand tu as une identification douteuse ou en cours, il suffit de classer la photo dans la catégorie "Unidentified..." la plus proche possible, généralement un genre ou une famille. Par exemple dans les "Unidentified Anthurium‎" si tu hésites sur l'espèce, mais dans les "Unidentified Araceae‎" si tu hésites entre un Philodendron et un Anthurium, ou carrément dans les Category:Unidentified plants by location si tu sais seulement le lieu de photographie. Si tu as besoin d'aide, tu sais où me trouver Clin.--Salix (talk) 11:23, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Description

[edit]

Si tu pouvais dans tes descriptions de photos sur Commons indentifier au moins les vues d'une même plante et préciser la date de photo dans la description (indispensable car elle pourrait très bien différer beaucoup de la date de création du fichier sur Commons), ce serait bien utile aussi. Rappel des données utiles aux botanistes (*indispensable !) :

  • Lieu de photographie*, localité et altitude les plus précises possibles, au minimum la région et le pays
  • Date de photographie*, au minimum le mois et l'année
  • données environnementales (exposition, support, type de végétation alentours, rareté...)
  • autres clichés d'une même plante
  • géolocalisation
  • crédit photographique
  • identification

--Salix (talk) 12:11, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Elsa pooley-black-and-white.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

LX (talk, contribs) 09:47, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Shoni-Schimmel.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: False authorship claims. Non-free photo by Scott Cunningham/NBAE according to metadata.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

LX (talk, contribs) 09:49, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Filo gèn', is the depicted sculpture very old? If not, who is the sculptor? --Túrelio (talk) 10:35, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

speedy deletion

[edit]

Hi Filo gèn', simply adding a file to "Candidates for speedy deletion" is not the correct procedure if you want to have a file deleted. For recently self-uploaded files, you may add {{speedy|1=uploader requests deletion}}. --Túrelio (talk) 08:31, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image du jour de Wiki Loves Earth 2018 en France, 7 May 2018

[edit]
Wiki Loves Earth 2018

Bonjour et merci pour votre participation à Wiki Loves Earth,

Félicitations, votre photo « Cour d'eau du parc national.jpg » a été choisie par les bénévoles de Wiki Loves Earth 2018 comme image du jour du 7 May 2018.

Pmau (talk) 08:32, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Je t'aime comme ça.jpg

[edit]

Hi. I think you should indicate -in the file data- where you took the photograph which is the basis of this File:Je t'aime comme ça.jpg. If not it can be DR'ed as "derivative work". Best. --E4024 (talk) 14:04, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Arlequin, commedia dell arte.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Copyrighted work by Pablo Picasso (d. 1973).
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:24, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Œuvre de Gino Severini.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Copyrighted work by Gino Severini (d. 1966).
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:26, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Je t'aime comme ça.jpg

[edit]
العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Je t'aime comme ça.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:27, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming

[edit]

Hi, We don't delete files because the name needs to be changed. Please use {{Rename}}. Thanks, Yann (talk) 07:28, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I explained you the procedure. Please follow it. And do NOT request deletion again. Thanks, Yann (talk) 15:54, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your File:Grace-Akello.jpg

[edit]

I've remixed it for my de:Grace Akello-article. Perhaps you want to make a notice on the File:Grace-Akello.jpg-side.

Have a good time, --Fritzober (talk) 07:42, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hotel de Préfecture.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pierre André (talk) 21:44, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Préfecture de Basse-Terre.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pierre André (talk) 21:52, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Ruthven (msg) 09:04, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why speedily delete it? Please explain.--Jusjih (talk) 00:16, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mairie de GOYAVE 97128.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 13:33, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Riviére La Rose.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 11:04, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rivière la Rose (Goyave).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 11:05, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rivière la Rose ( Goyave ).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 11:25, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rivière la rose.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 11:26, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your participation in Wiki Loves Love 2019

[edit]

Wiki Loves Love 2019 has ended and team Wiki Loves Love sends you greetings and appreciation for joining us in spreading love around the globe and documents how love is expressed in different cultures. We hope to see you again in 2020. Till then stay tuned to know the results of WLL19 that will be out in this April. Please make sure that your email is enabled so we can communicate with you if you are one of our prize winners.(learn more how to do)

Best regards.

Wiki Loves Love International Team

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:31, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS

[edit]

Hi. What gave you the right to make this edit?   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 05:26, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:La Gitane d'Henri Matisse.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

--Enrique Cordero (talk) 18:37, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Matisse murió en 1954, hace 65 años. Saludos, --Enrique Cordero (talk) 20:31, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
File:La Gitane d'Henri Matisse.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 20:58, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Filo gèn, sorry, but I had to revert your bad-name-tag of this file, as you did not provide a target-name (in case you meant a duplicate) or a better name (in case you wanted a rename). --Túrelio (talk) 09:53, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Earth France 2019 a commencé !

[edit]

Bonjour ,

J'ai le plaisir de vous annoncer que la cinquième édition du concours Wiki Loves Earth en France est ouverte !

Le concours concernera 368 zones de toute la France, des parcs nationaux jusqu’aux réserves naturelles régionales englobant ainsi des paysages et biotopes variés.

Pendant le mois de mai, n'hésitez pas à mettre en ligne des photos de ces zones que vous auriez sur vos disques durs ou à vous rendre dans une zone concernée près de chez vous (à l'aide de la carte). Le règlement est disponible sur la page du concours.

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé de commonistes, d'acteurs de l'environnement et de photographes professionnels. Un jury international constituera ensuite une sélection des meilleures photographies mondiales. Vous pourrez retrouver toutes les informations détaillées sur le site du concours


P.S. : si vous ne pouvez pas participer au concours cette année, faites passer le message autour de vous pour que de nouveaux et nouvelles photographes rejoignent l'aventure !

Bonne journée, Sarah Krichen WMFr (talk) 08:58, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Annona glabra (Seeds).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palicourea croceoides.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Agraulis vanillae (Caterpillar, last stage).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Urania leilus dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ricinus communis (castor bean) seedlings.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cajanus cajan (flowers) or panorama if relevant -->.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Citrus × aurantiifolia fuits.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Ok pour VI

[edit]

Regardes les modifications de ta nomination pour le polisseur. Si tu ne l'a pas fait tu peux faire l’image des gravures et la placer dans le concours. Bonne journée --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Archaeological grooves in Guadeloupe - Polisher.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Polissoir de la rivière du Petit Carbet 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 15:58, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Participation à l'édition 2019 de Wiki loves monuments en France

[edit]

Merci pour votre participation à l'édition 2019 de Wiki loves monuments en France.

J'ai toutefois dû retirer vos photos File:Parc Achéologique, Trois-Rivières.jpg et File:Parc Archéologique de Trois-Rivières 02.jpg du concours car elles ne représentent pas un monument historique.

Bonnes contributions, VIGNERON (talk) 12:23, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
We request the honor of your presence at Featured video candidates
Dear Filo gèn',
Are you Interested in Film Making/Videography/Cinematography or Animated films? We think you are. Featured video candidates needs your help and you can help by reviewing , nominating your videos for the FV Tag.
You can start reviewing/nominating videos now. Welcome !
-- Eatcha (talk) 10:41, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
File:Mémorial Delgrès( Fort Louis Delgrès ).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:41, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Queen Elizabeth II at a garden party - April 1954.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Queen Elizabeth II at a garden party - April 1954.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:58, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Le Futurisme.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:01, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:12, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FV Promotion

[edit]
This file has been promoted to Featured media!

The file File:ID15342 - Sansebie - Eucera longicornis - ♂ - Åkerhumle (lys) - Bombus pascuorum.webm, which you nominated at Commons:Featured media candidates/File:ID15342 - Sansebie - Eucera longicornis - ♂ - Åkerhumle (lys) - Bombus pascuorum.webm, has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another file, please do so.

/FVCBot (talk) 05:38, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.

[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Filo gèn',

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 12:09, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FV Promotion

[edit]
This file has been promoted to Featured media!

The file File:Lehren Wikipedia im Klassenzimmer.webm, which you nominated at Commons:Featured media candidates/File:Lehren Wikipedia im Klassenzimmer.webm, has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another file, please do so.

/FVCBot (talk) 18:57, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FV Promotion

[edit]
This file has been promoted to Featured media!

The file File:Wikilovesmonuments.org.webm, which you nominated at Commons:Featured media candidates/File:Wikilovesmonuments.org.webm, has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another file, please do so.

/FVCBot (talk) 19:08, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FV Promotion

[edit]
This file has been promoted to Featured media!

The file File:Fire rages at iconic Notre Dame cathedral in Paris.webm, which you nominated at Commons:Featured media candidates/File:Fire rages at iconic Notre Dame cathedral in Paris.webm, has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another file, please do so.

/FVCBot (talk) 04:46, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)

[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Filo gèn',

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 03:20, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]