User talk:Donarreiskoffer

hello, could you please give a source for all the images you´ve uploaded (Maria Laach)? otherwise they may be deleted. thx --62.158.120.57 04:32, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)

done pictures made by myself Donarreiskoffer 19:55, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Hello there. The images you have placed in the listing "Kitchen" do not seem to be appropriately categorized. Photos under "kitchen" would naturally be of a kitchen. You have listed items found *IN* a kitchen, but they would be best categorized under a listing that is more specific to what they are. It is unlikely someone looking for an image of a tin can (etc...) will look under "kitchen." Please sort them appropriately! Pacian 03:16, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Pictures from Sarajevo

I thing you have change the describtion for

Image:Sarajevo_ortodox_church.JPG, this is the catholic church,

Image:Sarajevo_catholic_church.JPG, this is the orthodox church.

--Boabo 20:00, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Thank you for the remark!! I swapped the images to the correct position Donarreiskoffer 11:10, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Grus Grus

I'm sure the pictures you added to Grus grus are in fact showing the Crowned Crane (i.s.o. Common Crane). I think it's the Grey Crowned Crane (Balearica regulorum) Theun 19:03, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Fiery Furnace (1).JPG

Wow - great photo. :) --Maveric149 03:13, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Atomium, Brussels, Belgium.JPG listed for deletion

Image deletion warning

Image:Atomium, Brussels, Belgium.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion on its entry.
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Kjetil _r 01:28, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Royal_Oak_Pub,_Fishguard,_Wales,_UK.JPG

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/− Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Orgullomoore 22:29, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Seems ok now --Donarreiskoffer 14:59, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ghent,_Ferraris_Map,_1775.jpg

If you have this map or know where to find it in Gent, please reply. I'd like to have a high resolution scan of it and am prepared to pay your expenses. Bedankt. (Previous comment by user:80.200.46.241)

I don't have the map myself, but you can buy (parts of) the Ferraris map at http://www.ngi.be/NL/NL1-4.shtm. Kind regards --Donarreiskoffer 09:23, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. You can delete this message if you want.

Image:Adolphe sax statue.jpg

Well, if it isn't allowed to upload pictures of statues to commons, then delete it. However, if it is allowed on en:, it would be nice to upload it back to en: Srtxg 19:00, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It depends. Who is the sculptor? Kjetil _r 20:59, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Categorieën

Hallo, wil je aub je uploads categoriseren (naar dorp/gemeente, en bv. Churches in Belgium en dergelijke...). Anders staan die foto's hier verloren, en geen mens die ze gaat terugvinden... --LimoWreck 00:06, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commons Picture of the Year 2006 Competition

Interested in honouring the best of the best? Vote now in the
Commons Picture of the Year competition 2006
Voting to select the finalists is open until 14th February.

The arrangements for the Commons Picture of the Year 2006 competition are now complete, and voting will start tomorrow, Feb 1st. All Featured Pictures promoted last year are automatically nominated. As a past contributor to Featured Pictures, we invite you to participate in the competition (but please wait until tomorrow to vote). --MichaelMaggs 22:23, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Solvay_Conference_1913,_Brussels.jpg

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/− Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Orgullomoore 15:06, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above image has already been deleted, because it was a duplicate of Image:Solvay conference 1913.jpg. The license of the image is template:PD-old. --Donarreiskoffer 15:53, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Yves Leterme.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Yves Leterme.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 14:22, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Kabouterberg_1.jpg

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you. Siebrand 12:52, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

Opgelost. Sonuwe 13:09, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Kabouterberg_2.jpg

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you. Siebrand 12:53, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

Opgelost. Sonuwe 13:09, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bossen,_Kasterlee,_Belgium.jpg

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you. Siebrand 12:57, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

Opgelost. Sonuwe 13:09, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

klaprozen

Dag. Heb een beetje ruis verwijderd op Image:Poppies in a field near Hoegaarden, Belgium.jpg. Als je 't niet mooi vindt, draai gerust terug. mvg. Lycaon 20:39, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your template

is now here. Please do not use it unsubsted in future. Thanks, abf /talk to me/ 20:13, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Donarreiskoffer!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:46, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ghent, Belgium ; Plan Saurel.jpg is uncategorized since 27 January 2009. BotMultichillT 05:46, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Gofio Mill, La orotava, Tenerife.jpg is uncategorized since 26 February 2009. BotMultichillT 05:48, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Front of Cathedral of Cefalù, Italy.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Grasshopper, Ardennes.JPG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Isohyet.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Acer, stage 4.JPG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Hamamelis Japonica x Mollis.JPG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Forsythia2.JPG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Acer, stage 3.JPG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:AZERTY keyboard layout.JPG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Acer, stage 1.JPG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Grus Grus, parc paradisio (1).JPG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Corylus avellana, flower and leave.JPG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Acer, stage 2.JPG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Grus Grus, parc paradisio.JPG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Flandres, Carte des Comtez, 1660.jpg was uncategorized on 29 April 2011 CategorizationBot 10:47, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Gand-gent-belgium-antique-city-plan-by-harrewijn-1720.jpg was uncategorized on 21 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:30, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Ghent by E.H. Fricx in 1702.jpg was uncategorized on 3 February 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:12, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Ghent by Johann Michael le jeune Probst in 1780.jpg was uncategorized on 3 February 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:12, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Image:View on Ghent in 1562 from Codex Iconographicus Flandriae.jpg was uncategorized on 6 February 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:52, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Image:View on Ghent by Lucas de Heere in 1562.jpg was uncategorized on 6 February 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:52, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Signorelli's

Well, the main subject is the frescos, which are bidimensional... --Sailko (talk) 06:54, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Kaeng Krachan

In dieser Kategorie sind jetzt Vögel und Hörnchen??? --Kürschner (talk) 12:55, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Map of Ghent, 1841.jpg

Beste Donarreiskoffer, ik schat dat deze kaart getekend is omstreeks 1858. Het stationsgebouw (voltooid in 1850) en de dierentuin (geopend in 1851) staan er reeds op. Verder staat de Kasteellaan in project getekend. Deze werd vanaf 1860 aangelegd. Het jaartal 1841 dat je aangeeft klopt dus niet. Verder staat er op de site van de universiteitsbibliotheek een kaart uit 1844 waarop deze elementen nog niet vermeld staan. Groeten, Sonuwe (talk) 22:45, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

En inderdaad, zo zie je bv. op het kaartje ook de "Vijfwindgatenstraat" tussen de Lange Violettestraat en de Frère Orbanlaan, een straatje dat maar 1855 zou aangelegd zijn. Een missertje op die site waar je het kaartje gevonden hebt, blijkbaar ;-) --LimoWreck (talk) 23:31, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ja ik heb het jaartal overgenomen uit de bron vermeld op de pagina [1]. Volgens die bron zouden een aantal straten al op de kaart getekend zijn voordat ze werden aangelegd. Blijkbaar is dezelfde kaart ook te vinden op andere plaatsen ([2], [3]) Op de website van de UGent staat er "1850?" [4], ook geen stellige zekerheid dus. Donarreiskoffer (talk) 18:35, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Map of Ghent, 9 march 1678.png

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

Category:Melanie Dursin

Hi Donarreiskoffer, according to http://europeanpeoplesparty.eu/subsubpagina.php?hoofdmenuID=1&submenuID=2&subsubmenuID=49 Melanie Dursin is a political adviser, which is, IMHO, different from being a politician. just my two cents. regards --Herzi Pinki (talk) 23:11, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct. I reversed my edit. -Donarreiskoffer (talk) 08:20, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Foto Bende

Beste Donarrreiskoffer, Inderdaad. De foto is op mijn nauwkeurige aanwijzing gemaakt door de vrouw van die booteigenaar. Hoe dan ook, zijn de rechten in mijn bezit. En ik zie ook dat u dat dubbelportret van Mark Eyskens en zijn echtgenote hebt versneden tot een banaal pasfotootje. Mag ik u vragen die verknipte foto uit Commons te verwijderen. U ontneemt me alle zin om hier nog aan mee te werken. Met groet, M.

Ik heb geantwoord op uw talk-pagina. Donarreiskoffer (talk) 19:01, 23 April 2011 (UTC) En... ik heb een nieuwe onversneden foto geplaatst van Mark Eyskens. Zal ik je een schaar opsturen?[reply]

Bedankt voor de nieuwe foto. De schaar heb ik niet nodig, dankjewel. mvg, Donarreiskoffer (talk) 20:11, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Met dank en warme groet, Michiel H.

File:Flandres,_Carte_des_Comtez,_1660.jpg

File:Flandres,_Carte_des_Comtez,_1660.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Gothance (talk) 19:50, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flandres,_Carte_des_Comtez,_1660.jpg

File:Flandres,_Carte_des_Comtez,_1660.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Gothance (talk) 07:31, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pairi Daiza

Hi. Probleempje met de birds of Pairi Daiza categorisering: soms met en soms zonder hoofdletter. Kun je even checken? MVG, Hans 12:20, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dankjewel voor de opmerking, ik heb een correctie aangevraagd Donarreiskoffer (talk) 13:36, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Coloma rose garden

Beautiful rose pictures... you didn't by chance also take pictures of the nameplates in order to identify those rose cultivars? --Anna reg (talk) 16:31, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, sorry, I didn't Donarreiskoffer (talk) 12:34, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Voor de category specialists

Extra werk op hier en Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Belgium. Bedankt en beste groet. --Foroa (talk) 09:36, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Aan onze onstopbare category werker: Onze vriend Pol Mayart weet van geen ophouden: zie onder andere Category:Onroerend erfgoed in Flanders waar ook Waalse beelden inzitten. In Commons:Bots/Work_requests#Template_.7B.7BOnroerend_erfgoed.7CUnidentified_locations_in.7D.7D heb ik gevraagd de onzinnige templates uit te zwieren. Veel plezier en bedankt. --Foroa (talk) 09:32, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token b4c0f0979ebf648fa4ad0742f7bb0285

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Straten in Hasselt

Beste, ik heb zonet een foutje van je moeten terugdraaien. Het voormalige augustijnenklooster ligt aan de Havermarkt en niet aan de Grote Markt. P.S. Al het erfgoed van Hasselt is nu opgeladen. Groeten, Sonuwe (talk) 12:43, 23 September 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Dankjewel voor de correctie Donarreiskoffer (talk) 13:46, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tin_can.JPG

File:Tin_can.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Kelly (talk) 00:59, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oosterschelde geen nationaal park meer? :)

Hoi Donarreiskoffer, ik zag dat je de cat Nationaal Park Oosterschelde hebt weggehaald bij een paar plaatjes, maar mag ik zo vrij zijn te vragen waarom? Groet, MartinD (talk) 19:37, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ik heb de logica onder Commons:Categories#Over-categorization gevolgd. Die plaatjes zitten al in de categorie Category:Eastern Scheldt. Een categorie die op zijn beurt wel onder Category:National parks of the Netherlands zit. Donarreiskoffer (talk) 20:21, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Is helder, dank voor de uitleg! Groet, MartinD (talk) 12:22, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Interior_of_Collégiale_Saints-Pierre-et-Guidon_(Anderlecht)

Interior of Collégiale Saints-Pierre-et-Guidon (Anderlecht) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Parsifall (talk) 15:23, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Stained_glass_windows_in_Collégiale_Saints-Pierre-et-Guidon_(Anderlecht)

Stained glass windows in Collégiale Saints-Pierre-et-Guidon (Anderlecht) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Parsifall (talk) 15:26, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

your mushroom photo

In case you were interested, this is a photo of Coprinus micaceus, the mica inky cap. Kgorman-ucb (talk) 04:52, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ok, thank you Donarreiskoffer (talk) 08:00, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

New categories

Hello. There is no need to overcategorize. See the help pages Commons:Categorieën. If you have a category "houses in X" there is no need to put the category in the main category "houses". If my explanation is not clear, please contact me. Traumrune (talk) 23:15, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the remark, but could you please give an example where I did overcategorize. There might be a specific reason wherefor I did. Donarreiskoffer (talk) 08:58, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:1894 Street Plan Gand Gent Netherlands Escaut River.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 15:01, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for the remark. I missed that one. Iave added the license now. Donarreiskoffer (talk) 15:08, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Foto's van invertebradosdehuesca

Ik dacht dat er geen hogere resolutie foto's was. Ik zal even goed kijken en de rest in hoge resolutie uploaden. Bedankt voor de tip! Ruigeroeland (talk) 12:53, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks. Voor mij is het niet bijster belangrijk, aangezien ik de illustraties vooral voor wikipedia nodig heb en daar toch alleen een kleine versie zichtbaar is, maar ik begrijp dat een hogere resolutie beter is. Ik zal er, ook bij Lepforum, op letten. Ruigeroeland (talk) 12:59, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Blandijnberg (street in Ghent)

Thanks for making this category! That's a good solution :) DimiTalen 08:11, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Donkmeer

Hey Donar Reiskoffer! Heb je deze foto's (1, 2) in de Eendenkooi (dierenpark aan het Donkmeer) gemaakt? Mvg, DimiTalen 15:21, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, in het dierenpark aan de eendekooi van het Donkmeer. Donarreiskoffer (talk) 08:23, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bedankt! DimiTalen 09:09, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ghent from Steden-Boek van J. Blaeu.JPG

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 13:39, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

:now fixed, is PD-Art-100 Donarreiskoffer (talk) 13:50, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ghent from Steden-Boek van J. Janssonius.JPG

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 13:39, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

:now fixed, is PD-Art-100 Donarreiskoffer (talk) 13:51, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Openstreetmap, Boeveriewijk, Bruges.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 12:42, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

is fixed now. Donarreiskoffer (talk) 13:17, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Special:Contributions/PMRMaeyaert

Dag, onze vriend Special:Contributions/PMRMaeyaert is weer in gang geschoten met nog minder categories dan vroeger. --Foroa (talk) 10:48, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Zoomify

Hallo Donarreiskoffer, das geht auch automatisch:

Beispiel: http://toolserver.org/~kolossos/image/zoomify.php?path=http://imageserver.mzk.cz/mzk03/001/046/568/2619268008/&zoom=5

Der "Path" ist die URL des Bilds (dafür einfach das Bild rechts klicken und "Grafik anzeigen" auswählen, dann die letzten Teile der URL entfernen).

Notfalls mit dem Zoom "spielen" (also auf 4 verringern, falls 5 nicht geht).

Abspeichern lässt sich das ganze dann z. B. mit dem "Pearl Crescent Page Saver" (z. B. für Firefox hier).

Siehe auch s:de:Benutzer:Paulis/Zoomify.

Herzlichen Gruß --FA2010 (talk) 11:27, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Falls Du einzelne Karten aus der Sammlung dort noch in den Commons wünschst, kann ich gerne noch einige übertragen (das ist eine fantatsische Website aus Brno, nicht wahr?) Bitte einfach kurz sagen, welche. --FA2010 (talk) 11:35, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vielen dank! Thank you for your explanantion. Donarreiskoffer (talk) 12:35, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 09:10, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year[reply]

File:Plan de la Ville de Bruges, Beaulieu, 1680.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 09:28, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Fixed, file is pd-art-100. Donarreiskoffer (talk) 09:30, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Als je ooit eens even tijd hebt ...

Dank je wel voor het vele goede werk. Als je ooit zin hebt, dan zijn er nog een pak beelden in Category:East Flanders, Category:Belgium, Category:Antwerp en Category:Brussels die daar neergeploft zijn, vooral door bots. Met vriendelijke groet. --Foroa (talk) 06:50, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I use some of your photos

Hello Donar!

I have use some photos of Equus grevyi and Papio hamadryas from wikimedia in my free software educational proyect "Animalandia" (http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia)

You can see directly in the follow links and click over "Siguiente" ("Next") several times:

http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/imagen.php?id=36700

http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/imagen.php?id=32436

If you wish, you can send me (via fernando.lison@educa.madrid.org) some letters or/and a photo for your "contributor profile" in Animalandia:

http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Donar+Reiskoffer

I want show to my students (and so everybody) that Animalandia is make for "real person", and I can tell them about "generosity", "share" and other similar words that they use very few...

This is my "contributor profile" and others, for example:

http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Fernando%20Lis%F3n%20Mart%EDn

http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Mamen%20Jim%E9nez

http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=David%20P%E9rez

http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Boris%20Loboda

http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Steve%20Garvie%20%28Rainbirder%29

In the future, I use more of your photos, I sure!

Thank you for the licence and, of course, for your splendid photos!! Regards! Fernando Lisón

--Fernando.lison (talk) 20:35, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

image:Belgische_staatsschuld.png

Hey DRK, ik las een discussie op Twitter over deze grafiek op het artikel nl:Staatsschuld. Pittige discussie! Kan je de bewuste afbeelding updaten naar de laatste gegevens? MADe (talk) 09:16, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Church, Saint-Valery-sur-Somme.JPG

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Church, Saint-Valery-sur-Somme.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Leyo 15:45, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I, Donar Reiskoffer, took this picture myself. This was already indicated on the image's page. Donarreiskoffer (talk) 16:01, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are not a newby. Why couldn't you fix it yourself? --Leyo 16:31, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Old_maps_of_Mons

Category:Old_maps_of_Mons has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Husky ^{(talk to me)} 12:18, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

De728631 (talk) 18:33, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:20110820 Ploumanach (2).jpg

File:20110820 Ploumanach (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Yann (talk) 23:31, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Donarreiskoffer/gallery

Dag Donarreiskoffer, er zijn tal van afbeeldingen verdwenen uit uw Gallery, enig idee waarom? Lotje (talk) 12:58, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Geen idee. Als je klikt op de 'ontbrekende' thumbnails blijkt dat de afbeeldingen wel nog op Commons staan. Dus wellicht een software-issue bij het refreshen van de thumbnails. Donarreiskoffer (talk) 14:24, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request!

Hello! It may be possible to download these high-resolution images?--IgorSokol (talk) 19:19, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you can explain how I can independently download these pictures?--IgorSokol (talk) 19:18, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I got an explanation at https://de.wikisource.org/wiki/Benutzer_Diskussion:Paulis/Zoomify#Lukasweb . Further help can be found at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Zoomable_images Donarreiskoffer (talk) 08:19, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have seen but not understood. Unfortunately, I do not speak English and German, in order to understand these complex texts. Please explain one particular example, any of these images. Maybe it is possible to get pictures with this program: http://ophir.alwaysdata.net/dezoomify/dezoomify.html I tried, does not work, can not get the correct URL--IgorSokol (talk) 11:52, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Example:

open http://www.lukasweb.be/nl/foto/portret-van-filips-ii-koning-van-spanje
right-click on image: open in new window--> you get http://www.lukasweb.be/nl/zoom/17971?width=850&height=605&iframe=true
view source code of page (in most browsers, simply press <CTRL>-U)
Within the html-source code search for the Zoomify-path: zoomifyImagePath=http://www.lukasweb.be/sites/default/files/zoomify/17971/c88215ea5424e7e89d70c8461e472017
fill this path in as in http://tools.wmflabs.org/zoomable-images/zoomify.php?path=http://www.lukasweb.be/sites/default/files/zoomify/17971/c88215ea5424e7e89d70c8461e472017
you will find the whole image at full resolution on a single page but divided into small images
using Firefox, and the plug-in such pagesaver, you can save the page as a single image.

I hope this will help. Donarreiskoffer (talk) 12:58, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for your help--IgorSokol (talk) 15:28, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cartes de Ferraris

Bonjour J'ai vu que vous avez importé des fichiers (par exemple Namur) depuis les cartes de Ferraris qui sont sur le site de la Bibliothèque Royale de Belgique. Avez-vous demandé une autorisation ou bien est-ce parce que ces cartes sont dans le domaine public ? Merci beaucoup et bravo, ce sont des documents remarquables. Als33120 (talk) 09:56, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Selon mon interpretation (et l'interpretation dus consensus sur Commons) ces images sont dans le Public Domain. Voyez sur Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Flandres,_Carte_des_Comtez,_1660.jpg pour plus d'information. Donarreiskoffer (talk) 11:37, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Donarreiskoffer,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:44, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Confituur.JPG

File:Confituur.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

(t) Josve05a (c) 03:54, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

19:49, 17 April 2006 upload of the atomium

Hello, do you still have this file? Please consider reuploading it to File:Atomium, Brussels, Belgium.JPG if you do and I will restore the history. It has been permanently deleted before the software update it seems. -- とある白い猫 ^ちぃ？ 07:51, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.^{[survey 1]} The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.^{[survey 2]} The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Categorizing files, description

@Donarreiskoffer: hier voegde je de category Pieter de Keysere toe, je bedoelde waarschijnlijk Pieter van der Beke, kan je dit even rechtzetten? Lotje 11:17, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Ok, ik heb het gewijzigd naar Pieter van der Beke. Pieter De Keysere was blijkbaar de drukker, niet de maker van deze kaart. Donarreiskoffer (talk) 17:55, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wijdenaardbrug_(Gent)

Wijdenaardbrug (Gent) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 07:20, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:EU-regions GDP per capita PPP.png

File:EU-regions GDP per capita PPP.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Kumkum (talk) 11:15, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:20110822 Pont de Térénez (10).jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Thesupermat (talk) 14:39, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Information template

The map information includes a normal information template. This is how you can use it. Castillo blanco (talk) 12:10, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Rectory of Lembeke

Hallo Donarreiskoffer, volgens de informatie op Emmanuel Van Speybrouck zou het pastoriegebouw (1772) van zijn hand zijn, volgens de Lijst van onroerend erfgoed in Kaprijke zou de Pastorie Sint-GillisparochieMonument (1943) 1772 van de hand van Frans Van Wassenhove zijn. Is dit te verifieren? Thnks. Lotje (talk) 07:42, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Statues of Our Lady of Beauraing

Hello, You add several photo of statues of Our Lady of Beauraing (as Our_Lady_of_Beauraing_06.jpg), where did you take this photos ? in the sanctuary of Beauraing ? in other cities ? Can you add a little comment in the wikicomons article ? Thanks for your Help. --Bergil (talk) 19:50, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I added the approximate locations of the statues to the image pages: (50.10386, 4.95816) and (50.10669, 4.95917) respectively. Donarreiskoffer (talk) 07:51, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:20110822 Pont de Térénez (9).jpg

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:20, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Delwaidedok

Hallo Donarreiskoffer gezien de naamsverandering --> Bevrijdingsdok vroeg ik me af of een rename van de category aan de orde is. Thanks. Lotje (talk) 09:45, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lijkt mij inderdaad correct om de categorie aan de nieuwe naam aan te passen. Via https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MovePage/Category:Delwaidedok kan je dit aanvragen. Donarreiskoffer (talk) 19:08, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Views_of_Amsterdam

Views of Amsterdam has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

JopkeB (talk) 14:01, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[1] This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.

[2] Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

[survey 1]

[survey 2]

User talk:Donarreiskoffer

Pictures from Sarajevo

Grus Grus

Image:Atomium, Brussels, Belgium.JPG listed for deletion

Categorieën

Commons Picture of the Year 2006 Competition

klaprozen

Your template

Tip: Categorizing images

Signorelli's

Foto Bende

Pairi Daiza

Voor de category specialists

TUSC token b4c0f0979ebf648fa4ad0742f7bb0285

Straten in Hasselt

Oosterschelde geen nationaal park meer? :)

your mushroom photo

New categories

Re:Foto's van invertebradosdehuesca

Zoomify

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Als je ooit eens even tijd hebt ...

I use some of your photos

File source is not properly indicated: File:Church, Saint-Valery-sur-Somme.JPG

Notification about possible deletion

Request!

Cartes de Ferraris

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open!

19:49, 17 April 2006 upload of the atomium

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Categorizing files, description

Notification about possible deletion

Information template

Categories

Statues of Our Lady of Beauraing

Notification about possible deletion

Navigation menu

Search