User talk:프랭클린

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, 프랭클린!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 06:16, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Commons is not an amateur porn site

[edit]
العربية | čeština | Deutsch | English | español | français | 한국어 | македонски | norsk bokmål | norsk | polski | português |slovenčina | slovenščina | Türkçe | 简体中文 | 繁體中文‎ | +/−
float 
Thank you for your interest in contributing to Wikimedia Commons, a non-profit media repository with the primary scope of providing educational and informative images and media. Submissions that are low quality or do not fall into Commons' scope may be subject to deletion.

One or more of your recent contributions has been identified by another Commons user as a possible image not in Commons' scope. Commons has guidelines on nudity, as a result of already having a large number of photos of genitalia, specifically the male reproductive system and the penis. Persistent uploads of low-quality images of genitalia will result in being blocked from editing.

If you have objections to the proposed deletion of your image(s), please see the links to the relevant deletion discussion(s) (listed above or below this message box). This message is not intended to be taken personally. Thank you for your understanding.

Ruthven (msg) 15:25, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ruthven (msg) 15:27, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]