User talk:Sin-siōng

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Sin-siōng!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 17:40, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

COM:OVERCAT

我發現你大量的編輯，打亂了原本的分類樹，建議你閱讀COM:OVERCAT方針，現在我逐一回退你的編輯。假如你沒有正當理由，請不要繼續這麼做。謝謝。--Kai3952 (talk) 12:31, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Townhouses in Taiwan

Townhouse 是指沿著馬路建造一整排的房子，類似於台灣馬路上常見連棟式建築，但是你添加的都不是「一整排」，圖片必須要有顯示出一整排，Category:Townhouses in Taiwan才適用。現在我已經幫你撤回編輯，請不要將獨棟的或者房子某部位特寫，什麼都不分就全部添加Category:Townhouses in Taiwan，這麼做是沒意義的，反而徒增與其他類別的混亂，這樣整理起來相當費力，屆時我們還是得必須移除你添加Category:Townhouses in Taiwan這類別。--Kai3952 (talk) 12:59, 22 July 2020 (UTC) 那麼請麻煩在此分類註解清楚，是Townhouses的「一整排風景」，還是Townhouses的「建築類型」，謝謝。因為分類說明只有說「臺灣的街屋（泛指一整排的房屋沿街道而築，又稱為「排屋」。）」，自然令人認為是在說明這種建築類型，而理應包含街屋建築的獨照或是局部特寫，例如Category:Townhouses的分類中便包含許多獨照與特寫。有些圖片例如https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dihua_Street_MiNe-5DII_103-2696UG_(8410546868).jpg很明顯也確實是街屋建築，也有顯示出連棟樣貌，卻被移除分類，然而像https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Townhouses_in_downtown_Hsinchu_01.jpg已是獨棟街屋，卻仍能放入此分類，因此個人希望能註解清楚分類的定義。--地下高雄 (talk) 14:37, 22 July 2020[reply]

(Kai3952我認為這分類沒有強制如拆古蹟般沒有空間可言，我想這並沒有指定《一群螞蟻🐜或一隻螞蟻》的分別，也望您善意推定謝謝。-- ABOVE THE SKY ✈ / SERVICE 14:50, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@地下高雄: 為了便於向你說明，我拆成三點答覆：

房屋不是風景。如果你依然是這麼理解，我想那不是「一整排的房屋」註解不清楚所造成。
你可以看英文的定義，en:Townhouse有解釋: "A townhouse is a type of terraced housing. A modern town house is often one with a small footprint on multiple floors." 既然有提到terraced housing，再看看[:en:Terraced house]]有解釋: "whereby a row of attached dwellings share side walls." 由此可知，房子與房子是相鄰，是連棟式的建築類型。
你說：「理應包含街屋建築的獨照或是局部特寫」，我先回答你這二張圖片：


1.	2.

1.這是局部照，他們分類並沒有將這種納入，所以我要去問他們看看。

2.這算是Townhouse，與兩旁房子是相鄰。我當時想法是，比照美國的分類，圖片拍出三、四間以上連棟的外觀，就像

。既然你提出來，看來我分類可能有問題，我會去問他們是怎麼分類。--Kai3952 (talk) 20:38, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Freedomwk: 不，這是有指定的，你可以看看en:Townhouse這篇文章，我想這並沒有一定要求你聽我的話，也望您善意推定謝謝。--Kai3952 (talk) 20:38, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Re: 請不要直接回退他人的編輯

我收到你的來函，但是你寫的密密麻麻，請容許我拆成以下四點答覆：

你自己在編輯之前也是沒有找我討論呀，而且你編輯也是依照你自己的主觀想法呀，所以我當然直接回退你的編輯。
按照你說：「如果有共識我們可以再更改」，那麼你是否有考慮到你編輯這麼多分類和圖片，每編輯一個地方就要找大家討論出共識，如此不就變成一直不斷丟出新話題，那能談得完嗎，別人有那種閒時間和我們一直耗嗎，由此看來，說不定會被大家認為是我和你之間編輯私怨，所以你別只想把問題推給我一個人。
你給我看special:diff/434613732、special:diff/434613685、special:diff/434613572、special:diff/434613453、special:diff/434613882這幾個，你意思就是想要添加「Category:Building ornaments in Taiwan」。除了Category:Tiles已經被JMCC1更改過去，其餘我沒看到有更改。如果你想討論，你可以找Commons:Help desk。
關於Townhouses，我已經在你討論頁答覆，請看這：special:diff/436309431--Kai3952 (talk) 21:46, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Images categorised

您好，由於Special:ListFiles/地下高雄沒有區分，考量到未來您可能會上傳很多，為了便於別人瀏覽、找尋及編輯，我已為您創建：

Category:Photographs by 地下高雄：Photograph是照片的意思，因此這是您的相簿，用於存放您自己拍攝的照片。每當上傳時就添加「Photographs by 地下高雄」就可以了。
Category:Files uploaded by 地下高雄：這可以存放您上傳過的圖片，無論是別人拍攝的照片，或是您製作SVG繪圖檔，只要是您上傳的都能放在這裡。每當上傳時就添加「Files uploaded by 地下高雄」就可以了。

提醒，兩者不能同時添加，否則會發生「過度分類」現象，你可以閱讀COM:OVERCAT這個說明。

此外，Wikimedia Commons是一次一頁最多能瀏覽200張，瀏覽方式是網格陳列（橫向6張，直向34張），不同於Special:ListFiles/地下高雄陳列方式，瀏覽、找尋都比較方便，而且比較好整理，因為您可以再細分出「子類別」，比如Category:Photographs by 地下高雄可以按年份、按建築物分類。

以上特此通知，請多加利用。--Kai3952 (talk) 17:55, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

請不要直接回退他人的編輯？可是我現在看你的行為依然沒有改善，不知道是誰教你這樣做？

上次你對我說「請不要直接回退他人的編輯」這種話，可是我現在看你的行為依然沒有改善，不知道是誰教你這樣做：

假如你不改善，反而抱持著「請不要直接回退他人的編輯」心態，那麼你可能是屬於CIR，難以融入我們，我會建議你不要太勉強自己繼續貢獻。當然你有權益選擇繼續貢獻，相對我們也有權益要求你改善，若是你堅持己見，將會再下次被發現時，開始發布警告，爾後警告若是無效，最後手段是將你的行為舉報COM:AN/U給管理員裁決。希望你可以自己先做到我們的要求，再來你才有權要求我們不要回退你的編輯，如此我們就不會認為你的編輯有何問題。這是有經過社群討論，並非我個人意見回退你的編輯，若是你不相信，你可以自己去Commons:Help_desk問問他們，看會有誰認為你的編輯是沒問題。--Kai3952 (talk) 17:22, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

雖然我沒找到討論過這個問題，但我找到Bjh21說的話。根據他說的，類別是命名photographs，只適用於照片。我依據他的概念，同理可知，類別是命名images，只適用於圖片，因為你添加那些類別都是神社，神社是可以放入與神社有關的聲音檔、影像檔，當然不是只能放images（圖片），怎麼會因為類別裡全部是圖片就當成是此類別是圖片，類別是類別，圖片是圖片，前者是集合庫，後者是檔案，本質與功用都大不同，不然我們何必需要要有Category（類別）開頭命名來存放各種檔案？這次你不清楚Category:Historical images of shinto shrines in Taiwan是用來做什麼，我希望你可以先去了解類別的用途，不要用你自己的想法去誤用，所以我很鼓勵你多多去Commons:Help_desk問問他們，他們會解說。我們每一個人都有自己要做的事，若非刻意的或明顯的「非正當」編輯行為，不會有人想找你麻煩，反而我們也怕你製造麻煩給我們，因為檢查及回退你的編輯是徒增我們的工作量。請好自為之--Kai3952 (talk) 17:51, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

我看到你的臉書：「我認為每一個人永遠都需要學習，不該自視甚高隨意批判他人，而他的這種處事態度可能會帶來不良影響，讓有心改善維基的人與新手，尚在學習摸索的階段便受到嘲諷責難，被數十篇批判疲勞轟炸，或被威脅要申報管理員裁決，而放棄進入這個圈子。這樣限制了他人的編輯權利，使得維基只有少數人能夠主導，也違背了維基百科的尊重包容、自由開放的基礎準則」

我認為你現在只要專心克服一個問題就好——把心朝往老手為努力方向做為目標去看，那麼你自然就只會在意該聽什麼才是對自己有幫助，該怎麼樣思考才是對自己學習有成長。比如「Category:Historical images」這個分類已經取名是image，這表示這個分類只能用在圖片image（圖片），若自己覺得感到懷疑，就設法去查證，找出Bjh21說的話，去思考他的概念是不是合理有用，若不合理有用，再拿這話去問他，如此一來就又讓自己從別人學到。

我知道Reke也有在關注我，因為他說：「猜又是Kai，不要難過，不是你的問題。」其實你也可以找他問，反正他都說我。--Kai3952 (talk)

首先要先說抱歉，因為個人時間等原因，前述的留言還未回覆，待日後再進行討論。而對於這次編輯內容的指正，謝謝你的提醒，未來會再注意，不過如有爭議處，我也會明確提出我的緣由。

接著要謝謝你看到我在臉書上的貼文，這樣你應該會了解我想表達的重點，不在於編輯內容，而是與人溝通的態度。此外，我知道不該採用維基外的討論，不過因為較熟悉介面，因此是先在臉書上面詢問了大家的建議，思考該如何回應。回到這個問題，當然百科的準確度是最為重要，但維基百科是許多人通力協作的成果，每個帳號都是活生生的人，有不同的情緒，每個編輯必然牽涉到人與人之間的互動，因此維基人需要彼此尊重，才能創設多元自由的維基(參考zh:WP:CIV)。這並不是說為了尊重他人，就要忽略錯誤、無止盡的包容，能力亦為必須，但以禮相待是最基本的(參考zh:WP:EQ)，對於我的編輯錯誤，只要能以平穩的態度來提出，我都很樂意討論並修正，例如Pbdragonwang在「User_talk:地下高雄#關於分類」所給予建議，我認為這就是良性的溝通。

如同過往的討論，我理解你是為了完善維基，而積極地改善他人錯誤，但偶而會出現的一些言語用詞，例如：

「不知道是誰教你這樣做」

「為什麼你選擇這麼做呢？我猜想，你應該很多上傳都是這樣子吧。」

「這應該常識才對」、「我分類數萬次，也問過不少人，從沒看過有哪個英語系國家的維基用戶會像你這樣想」、「我提供事實情況給你，好讓你可以準確找出比較好的辦法給我」

「我不知道你在發什麼脾氣」

「I thought you didn't know what it was」

可能你自己在回覆時，是出自於好意，就事論事，並未認為用詞有不妥之處，但你應該也會注意到，在這些討論中常有人表現出不舒服甚至是憤怒的言論，或許你會覺得這些人太情緒化，但你也可以試著想一下，為何一直以來都會有人對於這些用詞有意見，是否這種態度令他人感到不快。或許你認為自己已是很有禮貌的答覆，但就像心理疾病一樣，我們很難了解他人真正的感受，無意的言論可能使他人感到諷刺或嘲弄，因此謹慎用詞，不需要額外的評論，才能避免誤解，也能將討論拉回編輯內容本身，避免無謂又耗時間的爭端(參考zh:WP:EQ)。此外，每個人難免都會有錯誤，每個人隨時都在學習，維基也是認為要對新手友善(參考zh:WP:BITE)，也不該有領導層或是精英(參考zh:WP:SOP)，這不代表要忍受一切的錯誤，但仍應盡可能尊重他人。

我曾看過你的自我介紹這篇與這篇，注意到你自述曾經歷心理治療，也因個性而常引起溝通問題。其實我了解這種感受，因為我過去也有類似經歷，是有醫學認證的溝通問題，無法觀察他人的感受而做出令他人不快的事，也常不斷專精在某一個事務上難以自拔，而忽略了與他人的溝通態度，但我現在已經盡可能改變，因為我了解到，我的家人沒有理由要忍受我的脾氣。當然你的情形可能與我不同，我也了解要改變這種心理是非常困難、非常辛苦的，也不該強求他人改變自己的天性，但請記得，當一件事牽涉到他人時，我們應盡可能注意自己的語氣。適當的批評是必須的，然而也該尊重他人的編輯權利，沒有人有義務去承受他人的態度。

以上便是我想表達的，或許你也了解清楚這些維基準則、或許也有他人跟你談過類似內容、或許我的想法不完全正確、或許你完全不認同我的想法，但我的言盡於此，只要不牽涉到他人的權利與尊嚴，怎麼想都是你的自由。你提到說我應該把心朝往老手為努力方向做為目標去看，我會持續不斷的學習，而我也希望你能試著把心朝往「友善的維基人」為努力方向做為目標去看。

另外要附註的是，由於我在現實中有許多事務繁忙，可能會延誤許久才回覆，請見諒。此外，如果你不認同這篇對你的批判，如引起不快請見諒，歡迎你到互助客棧提出你的論點，讓大家一同討論。同樣的，我在FB上對你的敘述，如你認為有錯誤或偏激之處，也歡迎你親自在社團中提出讓大家了解，我很樂意與你一同討論，消除誤解。再補充一下，你所分享的Bjh21說的話內並沒有Bjh21的言論，不知道是否貼錯連結了，謝謝。--地下高雄 (talk) 02:29, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

連結一事：

的確是我貼錯連結，special:diff/293835835才是Bjh21說的話。是我不察，對不起。

自我介紹一事：

是你自己要去自我介紹歷史挖出來看，二篇都是2017年3月25日，距今已過這麼久了，況且我現在看到zh:User:Kai3952/自我介紹也沒有談到心理治療、溝通問題，這表示我移除了。既然移除了，你卻要拿來說我這人「但就像心理疾病一樣」，如此人身攻擊，請問我有像你這樣對別人有病嗎？假如沒有，你所謂「尊重」，至少要先做給我看吧，你卻在臉書上說我批判你的人格，我不清楚我怎麼樣批判到你的人格，請問我的批判是有說你的過去嗎？

你說「如同過往的討論」一事：

你不要用這種羅列的方式，若不是我反覆看仔細，我可能會誤解你在細數我的罪狀。我感謝你對我的肯定，也的確我指正別人是態度上有問題，但說簡單點，只是我用詞問題，就舉例我對雅婕是這麼說，幸得別人幫助下，我才知道是我表達不好，使她誤認是我要刪除她的照片；那個舉例是要告訴你，我沒有諷嘲、發脾氣，我說話依然會讓人不爽。

你舉例Pbdragonwang一事：

他那種做法是叫「教」，而我也是有教，只不過是你上次說「請不要直接回退他人的編輯」，請問你那次是我先過去找你說的，還是我回退你才引起你找我說？如果是前者，我被你說是我自找，我向你道歉：但如果是後者，請你以同理心思考，我會怎麼解讀你說「不要直接回退」這種態度。我就是憑你這種態度，然後又看見你做出需要別人指正的行為，我才會沒有耐性教你。假如「沒有人有義務去承受他人的態度」這話是你對我說，那麼我可以告訴你一個事實，當你我之間各自有自己的問題時，要求對方做什麼事，那最後結果只是變成在互揭傷疤，就像你現在說我「沒有人有義務去承受他人的態度」，你自己做不到，你覺得我會聽你的嗎？

你說「我也希望你能試著把心朝往 "友善的維基人" 為努力方向做為目標去看」一事：

既然我明白你我之間各自有自己的問題，無論你有沒有察覺或承認你自己有什麼態度問題，至少我自己知道，所以我會試著思考去說把心朝往 "友善的維基人" 為努力方向做為目標去看。請留意，我是說「我會試著思考」，可不是說我接受，這不一樣，兩者差別是有沒有全部照做。我沒有全部照做的原因，那是因為我曾經在這二次封禁當中有向社群討論過，因此我了解他們，他們不能容許被人發現有對commons運作上有妨礙，經制止仍不聽勸，他們就會要求管理員介入封禁，比如：我封禁原因是不接受自動巡查，造成洗板，以致於增添巡查人力負擔程度有達到妨礙。我說話態度差是不會影響到commons，就像我對Pbdragonwang舉報，管理員看見溝通這種事是不會管的，這也就是為什麼我只會當參考而不會全部照做的原因。--Kai3952 (talk) 17:30, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

對不起，我失察，是寫在關於我自白紀錄一、自白紀錄二，的確是我自己挖出來看，並不是你，真是非常感到抱歉，因此我添加<del>刪除線</del>以表示我撤下我說的話；同樣地，你說我「但就像心理疾病一樣」，因此我也不該指控你人身攻擊，但我還是會請管理員刪除這句話的歷史紀錄，因為沒有人願意被罵說有病。--Kai3952 (talk) 17:43, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please enable e-mail to be eligible to win a prize in Wiki Loves Monuments!

Thank you for uploading images for Wiki Loves Monuments!

However, we have noticed you have not enabled e-mail. To be eligible to win a prize the contest, you need to enable e-mail. This is what to do:

Check the top right of your screen, and log in if you have not done so already
Go to your preferences
Scroll down to Email Options
Enter your email address and click "Allow other users to email me"
Click Save

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2022! Please help with this survey

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Sin-siōng,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2022, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 150K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 35 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2022.

Kind regards, Wiki Loves Monuments team, 09:40, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

File:臺南開元寺20180116-11.jpg

File:臺南開元寺20180116-11.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:16, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:覆鼎金地藏菩薩.jpg

File:覆鼎金地藏菩薩.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : 2001:B011:A401:1E1E:A9CD:AA26:9EB0:A512.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 17:28, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:臺南開元寺20180116-10.jpg

File:臺南開元寺20180116-10.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : 2001:B011:A401:1E1E:A9CD:AA26:9EB0:A512.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 18:29, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:臺中林氏宗祠棟架.jpg

File:臺中林氏宗祠棟架.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : 2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 20:59, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Changing a file name

Hi, You made a change this file name, but I do not see any sourced justification, with references, for that change in the "description box". if correct, this is valuable information. Please supply the justification, and references, or I will be forced to revert the change and report it as vandalism. Have you communicated this correction, to the institution that owns it and who provided the original description and dates? Best regards. Broichmore (talk) 12:03, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The residence of British Consulate on the mountain (construction started in 1871) was already under construction in this photo . Which means this photo should have been taken in the 1870s, not 1868. The original description is wrong. This narrative is included in the revision history. 地下高雄 (talk) 17:31, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

你建立這個分類Guesthouses of Chiang Kai-shek，命名上可能需要改成Former guesthouses of Chiang Kai-shek。因為他人早在1975年就去世了，用途上根本不可能到現在還是由他繼續使用，而且有些行館已經改作為其他用途。--125.230.75.49 05:19, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

COM:AN/U

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#地下高雄. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

--125.230.88.69 02:40, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

你的回答說的是你的主張，並沒有考量到實際上的問題。縱使以英文字母，透過閩南語一套自我的拼寫系統組成一串名字，能反映此人的文化背景與當地語言，可是你要叫其他使用者（包含我）怎麼辦？還有，你說我將大阪看成是Daban而非Osaka，請問何時這麼做了？--125.230.88.69 06:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

你明明知道台灣使用多種語言，而每種語言有各自一套拼寫系統，這顯然你是知道彼此語言之間的拼寫是差別甚大，可是你卻對大家說：「this user confused the presentation and pronunciation of Chinese characters」，那不就是怪我自己造成的問題？你不要忘記，你和大家都是只用英文字母對類別名稱拼寫，而我看到就是英文字母。就如你舉例蕭美琴，改用英文字母拼寫，Hsiao Mei-chin (國語)、Hsaio Bi-khim (閩南語)、Louise Hsiao (英語)，彼此之間是完全寫得不一樣。這就好像是將「蕭美琴」三字蓋住，看到的名字就是有Hsiao Mei-chin、Hsaio Bi-khim、Louise Hsiao三種。如果不是有跨語言連結，除了你，我相信應該沒辦法使所有人都能知道這三種名字是同一個人。如果你真的認為是我自己的問題，比如你說我將大阪看成是Daban而非Osaka，請你證明給我看。--125.230.88.69 06:38, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

還有，就陳中和這個類別，我還發現一個奇特的現象。陳中和既然已經是叫Tan Tiong-ho，為何其下的子類不跟進，反而是選擇另一種名字Chen Jhong-he，這二種名字完全是不一樣。如果按照你的主張，其下的子類理當是要跟著Tan Tiong-ho命名，而不會是Chen Jhong-he。--125.230.88.69 07:11, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

陳中和紀念館是高雄市政府的歷史建築，所以會有官方的名稱且其採用了華語通用拼音。--TX55^TALK 17:45, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

我的意思是說，你如何知道什麼樣類別該用什麼樣方式命名？--125.230.88.69 07:16, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

我剛才看到這個類別Toa-Kio Presbyterian Church是你建立，而Toa-Kio這個名稱是閩南語拼寫，可是其他類別的名稱都是使用國語拼寫，不知道是你對閩南語的偏好，還是有什麼依據可證明該教會原本就是叫Toa-Kio？--125.230.88.69 07:59, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

許多基督教長老教會來台的時代並未使用華語，所以他們名稱會使用白話字來拼寫台語，因此多數長老教會的名稱都是台語。--TX55^TALK 17:45, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

不用怪我接二連三詢問這麼多問題，你在每一次回退時都在類別上加註說我對羅馬拼音有特殊的喜好，因此是你洗臉我在先，而我是來這裡私下找你問，怎麼看都是我對你很客氣了。--125.230.88.69 07:59, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

請問

我剛才看見你編輯Category:Firewalking，因此想請問你，「過火盆」算不算是Firewalking？--125.230.91.36 07:01, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

請問

我看到Category:Temples_in_Taiwan_by_year_of_completion有很多分類被清空掉，然後我依照編輯歷史去查，就查到你在1月4日有多筆編輯是將built改成established，所以我想請教你一個問題。

如果我沒有理解錯誤，「Temples in Taiwan built in 年份」應該是想表達該廟首次興建的年份，「Temples in Taiwan established in 年份」應該是想表達該廟首次創立的年份，不過你既然選擇將前者改成後者，這說明前者的分類是有問題。可是，我依循著分類樹往上找它們的母分類，看見寺廟是被歸類在宗教建築，而且我也沒有找到Category:Temples established in 年份，因此我想知道這當中哪裡出問題了？--125.230.91.79 10:27, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

請問

你創建這個分類Category:Bag-Gung，上面寫著「伯公」，可是我在網路上查到的資料，伯公就是指土地公，只不過是客家人稱為「伯公」，你看：https://www.hakka-beliefs.ntpc.gov.tw/files/15-1001-1561,c403-1.php

如果伯公與土地公是一樣的，是否要將Category:Bag-Gung併入到Category:Tu Di Gong？如果你反對合併，那麼我唯一能想到的是Category:Bag-Gung可以用於客家文化，然後將其作為Category:Tu Di Gong所屬的子分類，這樣就能區分，也能解決重複分類的問題，你認為呢？--125.230.67.198 11:28, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

依據過往經驗，我知道你可能只偏好於客棧那邊的討論，所以這裡你應該不會想回應我，那麼我不會勉強你。但是我必須提醒你，如果沒有回應，我上面提出二個解決方法就會變成由我決定。基於你是創建這個分類Category:Bag-Gung的作者，我不希望我的選擇而導致後來的爭議，所以我會建議你來決定。我之所以會如此執著，主要是因為Category:Bag-Gung可能存在與Category:Tu Di Gong相同的分類，重複的分類會造成後續的問題產生，比如過度分類，因此這問題必須要有人去解決。--125.230.67.198 11:39, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Fuxing_Palace_Temple,_Taipei

Fuxing Palace Temple, Taipei has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Wikimycota (talk) 00:27, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Menshen

您好，你上次的訊息我看到了，因此我現在開始對門神進行細分。--125.230.86.233 06:12, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

細分工作已經完成了，所以我想你說的問題應該能獲得解決。如果你要找二十四節氣及女性的門神，我已經歸類在這裡：Female menshen、24 Solar Terms，你可以前往看看。--125.230.86.233 13:01, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Results of Wiki Loves Folklore 2024 is out!

Hi, Greetings

The winners for Wiki Loves Folklore 2024 is announced!

We are happy to share with you winning images for this year's edition. This year saw over 41,038 images from 1921 uploaders represented on Commons in over 140 countries. Kindly see images here.

Our profound gratitude to all the people who participated and organized local contests and photo walks for this project.

We hope to have you contribute to the campaign next year.

Thank you,

Wiki Loves Folklore International Team

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:20, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Folklore 2024 Postcard

Please help translate to your language

Hello Sin-siōng!

We extend our warmest greetings and gratitude to you for actively taking part in the Wiki Loves Folklore 2024 Commons photography competition. Your valuable contributions have significantly enriched the world's knowledge and cultural heritage.

We are delighted to inform you that your efforts have placed you among the top 100 uploaders during this project. As a token of our appreciation, we would like to send you a special postcard.

To ensure you receive your special postcard postcard, kindly complete this form before August 15, 2024.

Looking ahead, we hope to see you again in February 2025 for the next exciting event.

Thank you once again for your dedication and Wikilove.

Wiki Loves Folklore International Team

-MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:52, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback Request for Wiki Loves Folklore2024

Hello!

As we close the curtains on a successful Wiki Loves Folklore 2024, we'd love to hear your thoughts! Your valuable feedback will help us improve future campaigns and ensure the continued preservation of cultural heritage around the globe.

Please take a few minutes to share your experience by filling out the following feedback form.

The form will be open for submissions until November 10th, 2024, at 23:59 UTC (Coordinated Universal Time). We appreciate your participation and support! See you in February 2025!

Sincerely, The Wiki Loves Folklore International Team

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:23, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Historical photographs of Changchun

Category:Historical photographs of Changchun is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

C1: Improperly named category

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Please see Commons:Categories for discussion/2019/09/Category:Historical images.--RoyZuo (talk) 21:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Sin-siōng

Contents

COM:OVERCAT

Category:Townhouses in Taiwan

Re: 請不要直接回退他人的編輯

Images categorised

請不要直接回退他人的編輯？可是我現在看你的行為依然沒有改善，不知道是誰教你這樣做？

Please enable e-mail to be eligible to win a prize in Wiki Loves Monuments!

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2022! Please help with this survey

File:臺南開元寺20180116-11.jpg

File:覆鼎金地藏菩薩.jpg

File:臺南開元寺20180116-10.jpg

File:臺中林氏宗祠棟架.jpg

Changing a file name

COM:AN/U

請問

請問

請問

Category:Fuxing_Palace_Temple,_Taipei

Menshen

Results of Wiki Loves Folklore 2024 is out!

Wiki Loves Folklore 2024 Postcard

Feedback Request for Wiki Loves Folklore2024

Category:Historical photographs of Changchun

Navigation menu

User talk:Sin-siōng

Re: 請不要直接回退他人的編輯

Images categorised

請不要直接回退他人的編輯？可是我現在看你的行為依然沒有改善，不知道是誰教你這樣做？

Please enable e-mail to be eligible to win a prize in Wiki Loves Monuments!

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2022! Please help with this survey

Changing a file name

COM:AN/U

請問

請問

請問

Menshen

Results of Wiki Loves Folklore 2024 is out!

Wiki Loves Folklore 2024 Postcard

Feedback Request for Wiki Loves Folklore2024

Navigation menu

Search