Talk:Panty line

moral: don't wear white pants!

Yes but the women know very well that they show their underwear if they wear white pants... It's not a bug, it's a feature ;-)

Wow, ten seventeen photographs of this incredibly trivial subject, while Agriculture and Architecture have one apiece. Systemic bias is so much more obvious when it's displayed in photographs rather than in text. 66.131.209.236 06:57, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)

LOL... so true 172.195.113.249 00:08, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)

• Wow, loads of pic to jerk off. Great Work folks! 195.37.188.211 10:56, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• This guy is such a stalker... WhisperToMe 17:00, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Can anybody tell me, what the hell all these women think about being in the WM commons? Have they been asked, if they agree to publish their pictures? I guess, no... --Mezzofortist 15:48, 17 May 2005 (UTC)

since the face is not visible it's probably unproblematic, in most countrys legally defensible and no permission needed. But it states clearly on Commons:Criteria for inclusion "The central aim of the commons is to be a media database for the diverse Wikimedia projects. Thus, media on the commons should be (potentially) useful to some such project, private image collections and the like are generally not wanted" This is probably more a private image collection of some weirdos people, than that we ever need so much pictures of such a trivial subject. -- Gorgo 17:06, 1 August 2005 (UTC)

Perhaps the importance of the collection is to enlighten the public. Learning of the capabilities of small photographic devices, and the actual behavioral habits of those in possession of these cameras, might prove to be of some value to some.

What constitutes 'value' should not be a point of contention at this particular location. These judgmental ideas, as in whether or not viewing the human body should be included in any discussions concerning morals, ethics, or law, are discussed in great detail elsewhere.

That people who wish to disparage and condemn the panty line-centric erotic preferences of others would find themselves looking at collections of panty lines is, however, very much location appropriate. I suggest that anyone engaging in such behavior should be viewed as a "weirdo," as it seems to be inherently hypocritical activity. Acting hypocritical is weird; it is not a typical thing to do. Looking at the gluteus maximus of women is, however, pretty typical of human behavior; my thanks to the editorial sensibilities of previous visitors.

Perhaps

the importance of the collection is to enlighten the public. Learning of the capabilities of small photographic devices, and the actual behavioral habits of those in possession of these cameras, might prove to be of some useful value to some.

What constitutes 'value' should not be a point of contention at this particular location. These judgmental ideas, as in whether or not viewing the human body should be included in any discussions concerning morals, ethics, or law, are discussed in great detail elsewhere.

That people who wish to disparage and condemn the panty line-centric erotic preferences of others would find themselves looking at collections of panty lines is, however, very much location appropriate. I suggest that anyone engaging in such behavior should be viewed as a "weirdo," as it seems to be inherently hypocritical activity. Acting hypocritical is weird; it is not a typical thing to do. Looking at the gluteus maximus of women is, however, pretty typical of human behavior; my thanks to the editorial sensibilities of previous visitors. -Manuel Noriega (fathom@dodgeit.com)

I don't have a problem with people looking at women's behinds. I'm just not sure that Wikimedia Commons is the place to be doing that. We're supporting educational and informative projects and somehow I doubt a detailed examination of women's arses was what anyone else with ideals about the thing had in mind. pfctdayelise (translate?) 11:48, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

Wow!

This is like coming across a fetishist's porn stash! Albeit very mild porn and a popular fetish. Yay, Wikimedia Commons! Maikel 01:25, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Hey, check this out! Cor blimey! Maikel 01:28, 28 May 2007 (UTC)