File:Soil fertility analysis 10 AA.jpg
Original file (711 × 756 pixels, file size: 80 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
Captions
Summary
[edit]DescriptionSoil fertility analysis 10 AA.jpg |
English: Soil fertility analysis. Analysis of Cu, Mn and Zn by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. |
Date | |
Source | Own work |
Author | Alandmanson |
Camera location | 29° 32′ 38.8″ S, 30° 16′ 07.47″ E | View this and other nearby images on: OpenStreetMap | -29.544110; 30.268741 |
---|
Analytical methods used in the Soil Fertility Laboratory of the KwaZulu-Natal Department of Agriculture and Rural Development
The Soil Fertility Laboratory routinely performs the following analyses as part of the Department’s Fertilizer Advisory Service, using the rapid procedures described by Hunter (1975) and Farina (1981): Ambic-2-extractable P, K and Zn, KCl-extractable Ca, Mg and acidity, and pH (KCl). These methods are briefly described below (Manson and Roberts, 2011).
Sample preparation
Soil samples are air dried at room temperature; they are spread out in drying trays and air is forced over them. When dry, the samples are crushed between rubber belts on a soil crusher and passed through a 1-mm sieve. Material coarser than 1 mm that cannot be crushed (such as stones, gravel and concretions), is discarded.
Batch handling
Samples are scooped into trays which each contain 11 PVC cups (capacity 70 mL); a tray is used for nine unknown samples, one standard soil sample (for quality control) and one blank. For operations such as dispensing and stirring, and for quality control, batches of three trays (27 samples, three unknowns, and three blanks) are used. Multiple dispensers and diluter/dispensers are used to dispense aliquots of extractant or reagent to three samples at a time.
Sample density
Soil samples are analysed on a volume rather than a mass basis. To enable the conversion of the results to a mass basis, the mass of a 10-mL scoop of a dried and milled sample is measured and the calculated sample density is reported.
pH (KCl)
10 mL of soil is scooped into sample cups. 25 mL of 1 M KCl solution is added and the suspension is stirred at 400 r.p.m. for 5 min using a multiple stirrer. The suspension is allowed to stand for about 30 minutes, and the pH is measured using a gel-filled combination glass electrode while stirring. De-ionised water is substituted for the 1 M KCl solution if pH (water) is required.
Extractable (1 M KCl) calcium, magnesium and acidity
2.5 mL of soil is scooped into sample cups. 25 mL of 1 M KCl solution is added and the suspension is stirred at 400 r.p.m. for 10 min using a multiple stirrer. The extracts are filtered using Whatman No.1 paper. 5 mL of the filtrate is diluted with 20 mL of 0.0356 M SrCl2, and Ca and Mg determined by atomic absorption. To determine extractable acidity, 10 mL of the filtrate is diluted with 10 mL of de-ionised water containing 2-4 drops of phenolphthalein, and titrated with 0.005 M NaOH.
Extractable (Ambic-2) phosphorus, potassium, zinc and manganese
The Ambic-2 extracting solution consists of 0.25 M NH4CO3 + 0.01 M Na2EDTA + 0.01 M NH4F + 0.05 g L-1 Superfloc (N100), adjusted to pH 8 with a concentrated ammonia solution. 25 mL of this solution is added to 2.5 mL soil, and the suspension is stirred at 400 r.p.m. for 10 min using a multiple stirrer. The extracts are filtered using Whatman No.1 paper. Phosphorus is determined on a 2 mL aliquot of filtrate using a modification of the Murphy and Riley (1962) molybdenum blue procedure (Hunter, 1974). Potassium is determined by atomic absorption on a 5 mL aliquot of the filtrate after dilution with 20 mL de-ionised water. Zinc and Mn are determined by atomic absorption on the remaining undiluted filtrate.
Effective CEC (ECEC) and Acid saturation
Effective CEC is calculated as the sum of KCl-extractable Ca, Mg, and acidity and Ambic-2 extractable K. Percent acid saturation of the ECEC is calculated as "extractable acidity" x 100 / (Ca + Mg + K + "extractable acidity").
References
Farina, M.P.W. 1981. The Hunter system of soil analysis. Fertilizer Society of South Africa Journal, 1, 39-41.
Hunter, A. 1974. Tentative ISFEI soil extraction procedure. International Soil Fertility and Improvement Project. N.C. State University, Raleigh, NC.
Hunter, A. 1975. New techniques and equipment for routine soil/plant analytical procedures. In: Soil Management in Tropical America. (eds E. Borremiza & A. Alvarado). N.C. State University, Raleigh, NC.
Manson, A.D. and Roberts, V.G., 2011. Analytical methods used by the soil fertility and analytical services section. KwaZulu-Natal Department of Agriculture and Rural Development, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.
Murphy, J. and Riley, J.R. 1962. A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Analytica Chimica Acta, 27, 31-36.
Licensing
[edit]- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- share alike – If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same or compatible license as the original.
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 12:31, 1 August 2017 | 711 × 756 (80 KB) | Alandmanson (talk | contribs) | User created page with UploadWizard |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Image title | SAMSUNG DIGITAL CAMERA |
---|---|
Camera manufacturer | Samsung Techwin co., Ltd. |
Camera model | Digimax A402 |
Exposure time | 1/30 sec (0.033333333333333) |
F-number | f/3.5 |
ISO speed rating | 200 |
Date and time of data generation | 12:34, 13 March 2006 |
Lens focal length | 5.84 mm |
Orientation | Normal |
Horizontal resolution | 72 dpi |
Vertical resolution | 72 dpi |
Software used | M4051S-0514 |
File change date and time | 12:36, 13 March 2006 |
Y and C positioning | Co-sited |
Exposure Program | Normal program |
Exif version | 2.2 |
Date and time of digitizing | 12:34, 13 March 2006 |
Meaning of each component |
|
Image compression mode | 2 |
APEX exposure bias | 0 |
Maximum land aperture | 3.6 APEX (f/3.48) |
Metering mode | Center weighted average |
Light source | Unknown |
Flash | Flash fired |
Supported Flashpix version | 1 |
Color space | sRGB |
File source | Digital still camera |
Scene type | A directly photographed image |